Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Diagnosis and Treatment Planning in Patients Suspected of Having Lung Cancer
This study is ongoing, but not recruiting participants.
Study NCT00005071   Information provided by National Cancer Institute (NCI)
First Received: April 6, 2000   Last Updated: August 19, 2009   History of Changes

April 6, 2000
August 19, 2009
October 1998
 
 
 
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00005071 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
 
 
 
Diagnosis and Treatment Planning in Patients Suspected of Having Lung Cancer
A Pilot Study Leading to a Randomized Trial Comparing Outcomes in Patients With Suspected Lung Cancer Investigated in the Conventional Locally (LO) Based (BA) Chest Clinic Compared With a Centralized 2 Stop Pathway (LOBA 2STOP)

RATIONALE: Diagnostic procedures and treatment-planning systems may affect outcome in patients suspected of having lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Randomized diagnostic trial to compare the effectiveness of two types of diagnostic and treatment-planning systems in patients who are suspected of having lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES: I. Compare the survival rate of patients with suspected lung cancer when diagnosed and managed using the conventional locally based approach versus a new centralized system using a 2 stop diagnosis. II. Compare the resection rate in both diagnostic arms. III. Assess the quality of service given in both diagnostic arms.

OUTLINE: This is a randomized study. Patients present to a general practitioner where they are referred to the local chest clinic. Patients are seen by the chest physician and, if deemed eligible, are randomized between 2 diagnostic arms. Arm I (Conventional Locally Based Diagnosis): Patients undergo bronchoscopy and CT scan as appropriate, and then are discussed or referred by individual chest physicians, as is the current practice. The optimal period for diagnosis and discussion of management plans is 6 weeks. Arm II (Centralized 2 Stop Diagnosis): Patients undergo CT scan the following Monday morning. The consultant radiologist advises the most appropriate diagnostic test (e.g., bronchoscopy or percutaneous needle biopsy) to be done that same Monday. A tissue diagnosis is available Thursday morning for the multidisciplinary meeting attended by the chest physician, medical and clinical oncologists, and a surgeon, and the patient treatment plan is decided. Quality of life is assessed at baseline and at 6 weeks. Patients are followed for 2 years.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 252-315 patients will be accrued for this study within 2 years.

 
Interventional
Diagnostic, Randomized
Lung Cancer
  • Procedure: biopsy
  • Procedure: bronchoscopy
  • Procedure: computed tomography
  • Procedure: quality-of-life assessment
 
 

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by National Clinical Trials Identifier (NCT ID) in Medline.
 
Active, not recruiting
 
 
 

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Possible diagnosis of lung cancer Fit enough for bronchoscopy and CT scan

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age: Not specified Performance status: Not specified Life expectancy: Not specified Hematopoietic: Not specified Hepatic: Not specified Renal: Not specified

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: Not specified

Both
 
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
United Kingdom
 
NCT00005071
 
CDR0000067676, RMNHS-PATHWAY, EU-99039
Royal Marsden - London
 
Study Chair: Mary O'Brien, MD Royal Marsden - Surrey
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
June 2007

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP