Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Phase II Randomized Study of Cultured Skin Substitutes Versus Split Thickness Skin Grafts in Patients With Severe Burn Injuries
This study is currently recruiting participants.
Study NCT00004413   Information provided by FDA Office of Orphan Products Development
First Received: October 18, 1999   Last Updated: June 23, 2005   History of Changes

October 18, 1999
June 23, 2005
October 1999
 
 
 
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00004413 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
 
 
 
Phase II Randomized Study of Cultured Skin Substitutes Versus Split Thickness Skin Grafts in Patients With Severe Burn Injuries
 

OBJECTIVES:

I. Determine the safety and efficacy of biosynthetic skin substitute as a routine therapy for treatment of severe burn injuries.

PROTOCOL OUTLINE: This is a randomized study. Two wound sites of similar area and depth are selected on each patient to receive the study treatments. One site is randomized to receive cultured skin substitute (CSS) grafts and the other receives split-thickness skin grafts (STSG). Prior to randomization all wounds are treated according to prevailing standards of burn care. CSS and STSG are surgically applied approximately 21 to 28 days after a thin split thickness autograft is harvested to prepare CSS grafts. Each wound is excised and irrigated prior to the application of either CSS or STSG.

Patients are followed for at least 1 year after treatment.

Phase II
Interventional
Treatment, Randomized, Efficacy Study
Burns
Procedure: Skin graft
 
 

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by National Clinical Trials Identifier (NCT ID) in Medline.
 
Recruiting
 
 
 
  • Thermal burns that require skin grafts 3 or more weeks after admission to the hospital
  • Not pregnant
Both
up to 75 Years
No
 
United States
 
NCT00004413
 
199/13305, UCMC-FDR000672, UCMC-IDE-G980023
FDA Office of Orphan Products Development
University of Cincinnati
Study Chair: Steven T. Boyce University of Cincinnati
FDA Office of Orphan Products Development
January 2000

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP