Driving in Mild Dementia Decision Tool (DMD-DT)
Based on the literature on dementia and driving, and on knowledge tools available to date including one from our current work, a Driving in Mild Dementia Decision Tool (DMD-DT) will be adapted and tailored to guide physicians in their decisions to report a driver with mild dementia to the provincial licensing agency. The DMD-DT intervention will include a) an algorithm-based computerized clinical decision support system (CCDSS) for facilitating driving assessment and physicians' reporting to provincial transportation authorities, b) an individualized educational package for patients and caregivers about dementia and driving and driving cessation, and c) a modified reporting form to provincial driving regulatory authorities. Months 1 to 6: The DMD-DT will be tailored and adapted to practice with the input of the co-investigators and knowledge-users who represent the perspectives of physicians, patients and their caregivers, as well as transportation authorities. Pilot testing will be done, and input from focus groups of knowledge-users will refine the intervention. Physicians will be recruited to participate in a clinical trial of the DMD-DT. Months 7-18: A parallel-group cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) will be conducted to compare the effects of the DMD-DT to a legislation reminder on recommendations for reporting to the licensing agency. The effects of the DMD-DT on the doctor-patient relationship will be further explored in focus groups and interviews with physicians. Months 19-24: The knowledge obtained from the study will be used to generalize and sustain use of the intervention beyond Ontario, Canada, and to disseminate the information to knowledge-users. The primary outcome measure is the filing of a report to the Ministry of Transportation of Ontario, indicating that the physician has a concern about the patient's health condition (i.e. mild dementia). The primary outcome of the study is the difference in reporting between the DMD-DT and control arms. Since the current reporting rate is low, approximately 13%, from a public health point of view, the primary outcome expected is that physicians in the DMD-DT group will report more patients with mild dementia than those in the control group.
|Study Design:||Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Treatment
|Official Title:||Driving in Mild Dementia Decision Tool|
- Number of patients reported to the Ontario Ministry of Transportation [ Time Frame: When participants have completed 500 patient assessments (expected to take approximately 12 months) ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]The primary outcome of this study is the number of patients reported to the Ontario Ministry of Transportation by study participants. A "report" indicates that the participant believes his/her patient may be unsafe to continue driving due to mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia. The difference in the number of reports filed between the intervention and control group participants will be assessed.
- The number of "false positives", i.e. number of patients reported to the Ontario Ministry of Transportation as potentially being unsafe drivers who are deemed by expert consensus to be safe drivers. [ Time Frame: When participants have completed 500 patient assessments (expected to take approximately 12 months) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Although the primary aim of the study from a public health point of view is to increase reporting of patients with mild dementia to transportation authorities who are unsafe to drive according to best-evidence, it is important to ensure that physician reporting does not unfairly punish those who are deemed not to be at significant potential risk. Hence, a secondary outcome measure will examine the number of false positive reports, or the number of patients reported when expert consensus indicates they should NOT be reported.
- Number of recommendations given for specialized on-road testing [ Time Frame: When participants have completed 500 patient assessments (expected to take approximately 12 months) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]International guidelines suggest that when physicians are uncertain about the driving safety of their patients, specialized on-road testing should be strongly considered. Such testing, while expensive, has substantially more face validity than in-office testing. A secondary outcome measure for this study is therefore the number of recommendations made by participants for specialized on-road testing for the patients assessed in the study.
- Quality of Doctor-Patient Relationship [ Time Frame: When participants have completed 500 patient assessments (expected to take approximately 12 months) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Many physicians avoid discussing issues related to driving with their patients who have mild dementia and their caregivers or family members, because it can have a negative effect on the doctor-patient relationship. The impact of the Driving in Mild Dementia Decision Tool on the doctor-patient relationship will be examined in two ways: first, by comparing responses between intervention and control group participants on four 5-point Likert-type questions following each patient encounter; and second, by analyzing transcripts from focus groups with participants following completion of the trial.
|Study Start Date:||January 2014|
|Estimated Study Completion Date:||June 2015|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date:||June 2015 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)|
Experimental: Driving in Mild Dementia Decision Tool
Participants in this arm will be assessing patients using the Driving in Mild Dementia Decision Tool
Other: Driving in Mild Dementia Decision Tool
Study participants will be screening patients for fitness to drive using our DMD-DT, instead of using their usual care strategies.
No Intervention: Control
Participants will assess patients using their usual care strategies.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02036099
|Contact: Carla Zucchero Sarracini, BA||1 416-480-6100 ext email@example.com|
|Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre||Recruiting|
|Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4N 3M5|
|Contact: Carla Zucchero Sarracini, BA 416-480-6100 ext 3095 Carla.ZuccheroSarracini@sunnybrook.ca|
|Principal Investigator: Mark J Rapoport, MD, FRCPC|
|Principal Investigator:||Mark J Rapoport, MD||Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre|