Prospective Randomized Trial of Incisionless Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Colectomy for Left-sided Colonic Tumors
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
To compare the two surgical options in their short-term and long term outcomes in the management of early left-sided colorectal cancers. The hypothesis is that the incisionless approach will result in less postoperative pain and wound related complications.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Pain, Postoperative Wound Complication |
Procedure: incisionless laparoscopic colectomy Procedure: conventional laparoscopic colectomy |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Prospective Randomized Trial of Incisionless Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Colectomy for Left-sided Colonic Tumors |
- pain score [ Time Frame: average of 1 week ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]participants will be followed for the pain score during the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week
- wound complication [ Time Frame: up to 30 days after the operation ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]The patient will be followed for up to 30 days after the operation or till occurrence of event
- intraoperative blood loss [ Time Frame: From the start of operation till operation finished ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]From the start of operation till operation finished
- operative time [ Time Frame: From the start of operation till operation finished ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]From the start of operation till operation finished
- length of hospital stay [ Time Frame: From the date after operation to date of discharge,an expected average of within 1 week ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]From the date after operation to date of discharge,an expected average of within 1 week
| Enrollment: | 70 |
| Study Start Date: | June 2009 |
| Study Completion Date: | June 2012 |
| Primary Completion Date: | March 2012 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: incisionless laparoscopic colectomy
incisionless laparoscopic colectomy: Laparoscopic colectomy is being performed in the same manner as conventional laparoscopic colectomy, except that at the end of procedure, the TEO device with the outer diameter of 4cm is inserted into the anus for the delivery of specimen and insertion of anvil instead of creating a small wound as in the conventional laparoscopic colectomy. Finally, intra-corporeal anastomosis is performed in the same manner with the TEO device removed.
|
Procedure: incisionless laparoscopic colectomy
Arm 1:Incisionless Laparoscopic Colectomy Laparoscopic colectomy is being performed in the same manner as conventional laparoscopic colectomy, except that at the end of procedure, the TEO device with the outer diameter of 4cm is inserted into the anus for the delivery of specimen and insertion of anvil instead of creating a small wound as in the conventional laparoscopic colectomy. Finally, intra-corporeal anastomosis is performed in the same manner with the TEO device removed.
|
|
Active Comparator: conventional laparoscopic colectomy
conventional laparoscopic colectomy: The operation is completed by laparoscopic instruments using video laparoscopy. At the end of the procedure, pneumoperitoneum is abolished and a small wound was created for the delivery of bowel and insertion of anvil of the circular stapler. Finally, pneumoperitoneum is re-created for intra-corporeal anastomosis
|
Procedure: conventional laparoscopic colectomy
Arm 2: Conventional Laparoscopic colectomy The operation is completed by laparoscopic instruments using video laparoscopy. At the end of the procedure, pneumoperitoneum is abolished and a small wound was created for the delivery of bowel and insertion of anvil of the circular stapler. Finally, pneumoperitoneum is re-created for intra-corporeal anastomosis
|
Detailed Description:
For the left-sided colorectal cancer, the investigators performed colectomy with primary anatomosis. Currently the investigators have two methods of minimal access approach to the abdominal cavity in order to complete this operation:
- Conventional Laparoscopic colectomy The operation is completed by laparoscopic instruments using video laparoscopy. At the end of the procedure, pneumoperitoneum is abolished and a small wound was created for the delivery of bowel and insertion of anvil of the circular stapler. Finally, pneumoperitoneum is re-created for intra-corporeal anastomosis
- Incisionless Laparoscopic Colectomy Laparoscopic colectomy is being performed in the same manner as conventional laparoscopic colectomy, except that at the end of procedure, the Transanal Endoscopic Operation (TEO) device with the outer diameter of 4cm is inserted into the anus for the delivery of specimen and insertion of anvil instead of creating a small wound as in the conventional laparoscopic colectomy. Finally, intra-corporeal anastomosis is performed in the same manner with the TEO device removed.
These two operations are essentially identical except for the surgical access for the delivery of specimen and insertion of anvil. Laparoscopic colectomy and the use of Transanal Endoscopic Operation(TEO)device have been practiced in the United States and Europe for over 10 years. Large scale studies in the literature have demonstrated the safety and benefits of laparoscopic colectomy for colonic tumors and the oncological outcomes have not shown to be inferior to open approach. With the use of TEO device, the investigators can perform laparoscopic colectomy without abdominal incision for those early left-sided colonic tumors and thus it can eliminate the wound-related complications theoretically. In order to find out which one is a better procedure, the investigators are carrying out a clinical trial to compare the two surgical options in their short-term and long term outcomes.The results of this study may have an impact on the care of similar patients in the future.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
patients >18 years old and diagnosed to have operable left-sided colorectal cancers distal to the splenic flexure and proximal to the upper rectum were potential candidates.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient who did not give informed consent;
- Patient who were considered unfit for operative treatment;
- Patient presented as acute surgical emergencies, including intestinal obstruction, peritonitis, or pericolic abscess, etc.;
- Patients with metastatic diseases on preoperative work up;
- Patient with synchronous tumours or polyps which necessitate extended or additional resection;
- Patients with large bulky tumor as demonstrated on preoperative colonoscopy or computed tomography showing serosal involvement or invasion to contiguous organs.
- Patients with anal stenosis that precluded the insertion of TEO device
Contacts and Locations| China | |
| Department of Surgery, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital | |
| Hong Kong, China | |
| Principal Investigator: | Yui Shan Cheung, FRACS | Department of Surgery, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Cheung Yui Shan, Department of Surgery, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01762254 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | HKEC-2009-023 |
| Study First Received: | November 29, 2012 |
| Last Updated: | January 4, 2013 |
| Health Authority: | Hong Kong: Ethics Committee |
Keywords provided by Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital:
|
pain score complication |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Colonic Neoplasms Colorectal Neoplasms Intestinal Neoplasms Gastrointestinal Neoplasms Digestive System Neoplasms Neoplasms by Site |
Neoplasms Digestive System Diseases Gastrointestinal Diseases Colonic Diseases Intestinal Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on June 18, 2013