High Definition Endoscopy With i-Scan for Small Colonic Polyp Evaluation: The HiScope Study (HiSCOPE)
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Current standard practice is to remove all colonic polyps found during colonoscopy as it has not been possible to distinguish between polyps with some malignant potential (adenomatous) and those with negligable malignant potential (non-adenomatous).
Recent advances in endoscope imaging and technology have allowed endoscopists to distinguish between these two types of polyps by examining minute surface details.
i-Scan is a new digital enhancement method that aims to enhance surface details and may enable similar accurate distinction between adenomatous and non-adenomatous polyps.
Hypothesis:
High definition white light endoscopy plus i-Scan improves diagnostic accuracy of in-vivo assessment of colonic polyps <10mm in size over high definition white light endoscopy alone.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Colonic Polyps |
Procedure: High definition white light endoscopy |
| Study Type: | Observational |
| Study Design: | Observational Model: Cohort Time Perspective: Prospective |
| Official Title: | A Prospective Single-blind Observational Cohort Study of High Definition White Light Endoscopy and i-Scan Image Enhancement for the Characterisation of Small Colonic Polyps |
- Diagnostic Accuracy of In-vivo Polyp Assessment [ Time Frame: Once histopathology results are known, approximately 2 weeks after in-vivo assessment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Diagnostic accuracy of in-vivo assessment of colonic polyps <10mm in size using high definition white light endoscopy and high definition white light endoscopy plus i-Scan image enhancement. Accuracy compared to the gold standard of histopathology. Accuracy - number of polyps with histology correctly predicted by in-vivo method/total number of polyps assessed (Expressed as a percentage)
- Sensitivity for Adenomatous Histology of Colonic Polyps <10mm in Size [ Time Frame: Once histopathology results are known, approximately 2 weeks after in-vivo assessment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Sensitivity for adenomatous histology of in-vivo assessment of colonic polyps <10mm in size using high definition white light endoscopy and high definition white light endoscopy plus i-Scan image enhancement. Sensitivity compared to the gold standard of histopathology. Senstivity for adenomatous histology = number of correctly identified adenomas (true positives)/total number of adenomas (true positives + false negatives)
- Specificity for Adenomatous Histology of Colonic Polyps <10mm in Size [ Time Frame: Once histopathology results are known, approximately 2 weeks after in-vivo assessment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Specificity for adenomatous histology of in-vivo assessment of colonic polyps <10mm in size using high definition white light endoscopy and high definition white light endoscopy plus i-Scan image enhancement. Specificity compared to the gold standard of histopathology. Specificity for adenomatous histology = number of correctly identified non-neoplastic polyps (true negatives)/total number of non-neoplastic polyps (true negatives + false positives)
- Negative Predictive Value for Adenomatous Histology of Rectosigmoid Polyps ≤5mm in Size [ Time Frame: Once histopathology results are known, approximately 2 weeks after in-vivo assessment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Negative predictive value for adenomatous histology of rectosigmoid polyps ≤5mm in size using high definition white light endoscopy and high definition white light endoscopy plus i-Scan image enhancement. NPV compared to the gold standard of histopathology. Negative predictive value = number of true negatives/(number of true negatives + number of false negatives)
- Accuracy of Prediction of Polyp Surveillence Intervals [ Time Frame: Once histopathology results are known, approximately 2 weeks after in-vivo assessment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Accuracy of prediction of post-polypectomy surveillence colonoscopy intervasl based on national guidelines. Intervals based on in-vivo assessment of all polyps ≤5mm in size combined with histopathology of polyps >5mm in size will be compared to intervals determined by histopathology of all polyps
| Enrollment: | 84 |
| Study Start Date: | May 2011 |
| Study Completion Date: | May 2012 |
| Primary Completion Date: | May 2012 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
Show Detailed Description
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 60 Years to 74 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
| Sampling Method: | Non-Probability Sample |
UK Bowel Cancer Screening patients attending for colonoscopy
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients found to have colonic polyps up to 10mm in size
Exclusion Criteria:
- Poor bowel preparation
- Inflammatory bowel disease
- Polyposis syndrome
Contacts and Locations
More Information
Publications:
| Responsible Party: | Pradeep Bhandari, Professor of Gastroenterology, Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01761279 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | PHT/2009/046 |
| Study First Received: | January 3, 2013 |
| Results First Received: | January 7, 2013 |
| Last Updated: | February 25, 2013 |
| Health Authority: | United Kingdom: National Health Service |
Keywords provided by Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust:
|
Colonic polyps |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Colonic Polyps Polyps Intestinal Polyps Pathological Conditions, Anatomical |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 19, 2013