Screw Versus Tightrope Syndesmotic Injury Fixation in Weber C Ankle Fractures

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Harri Pakarinen, University of Oulu
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01742650
First received: June 12, 2012
Last updated: December 2, 2012
Last verified: December 2012
  Purpose

The aim of our study is to compare two different syndesmosis transfixation methods in AO/OTA Weber C ankle fractures. Our hypothesis is that 50% of screw fixed fibulas but only 5% of suture-button fixed fibulas are in malposition. All skeletally mature patients (16 years or older) with AO/OTA Weber C type fractures operated within a week after trauma are consecutively included into the study. The tibiofibular transfixation is randomly performed either by a 3,5 mm tricortical screw or a suture-button (TightRope). Malposition of the tibiofibular joint is assessed in an intraoperative computed tomography. Clinical outcome is assessed by using Olerud-Molander, RAND ja 36-Item Healt Survey after 1-year from the injury.


Condition Intervention
Trauma
Procedure: Syndesmosis fixation

Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Safety Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: Screw Versus Tightrope Syndesmotic Injury Fixation in Weber C Ankle Fractures. A Prospective Randomized Study.

Resource links provided by NLM:


Further study details as provided by University of Oulu:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • Malreduction of the tibiofibular joint in the intraoperative computed tomography [ Time Frame: 2 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Malreduction in the tibiofibular joint is assessed post op from the intraoperative computed tomography. Both ankles are imaged and difference at least 2 mm is assessed to be significant


Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • Clinical outcome one year after the injury [ Time Frame: 2 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Clinical outcome was assessed using the Olerud-Molander scoring system, RAND 36-Item Health Survey, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to measure pain and function after a minimum 2-year of follow-up.


Enrollment: 38
Study Start Date: July 2010
Study Completion Date: December 2011
Primary Completion Date: December 2011 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Arms Assigned Interventions
Screw fixation
3,5mm fully threaded cortical screw transfixation of syndesmosis
Procedure: Syndesmosis fixation
TightRope
TightRope transfixation of Syndesmosis
Procedure: Syndesmosis fixation

Detailed Description:

The aim of our study is to compare two different syndesmosis transfixation methods in AO/OTA Weber C ankle fractures. Screw fixation is widely and mostly used transfixation but suture-button is also shown to be a biomechanically stable and probably more physiologic transfication method. It is shown that even 50 % of the syndesmosis srews and thus fibulas are in malposition. With more physiologic suture-button transfixation this malposition is thought to be less commmon. There is no studies comparing screw and suture-button syndesmosis transfixation methods in AO/OTA Weber C ankle fracture patients.

Our hypothesis is that 50% of screw fixed fibulas but only 5% of suture-button fixed fibulas are in malposition assessed in the intraoperative computed tomography. Malposition is assessed to present if difference between fractured and non-fractured side is at least 2 mm in the tibiofibular joint. Thus, the sample size is assessed to be 19 patients per group (alpha=0.05, Beta=0.2, 20% drop out).

All skeletally mature patients (16 years or older) with AO/OTA Weber C type fractures operated within a week after trauma are included into the study. Exclusion criteria are previous ankle fracture, concomitant tibial fracture, diabetes with peripheral neuropathy, pathological fracture or inadequate co-operation.

After bony fixation the tibiofibular transfixation is randomly performed either by a 3,5 mm tricortical screw or a suture-button (TightRope). An intraoperative computed tomography is imaged from the both ankles of all patients. The operation is continued with six weeks casting without weight-bearing.

Clinical outcome was assessed using the Olerud-Molander scoring system, RAND 36-Item Health Survey, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to measure pain and function after a minimum 1-year of follow-up.

  Eligibility

Ages Eligible for Study:   16 Years and older
Genders Eligible for Study:   Both
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • AO/OTA Weber C ankle fracture, operation within 7 days from the injury

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Bilateral or previous ankle fracture, tibial shaft fracture, diabetes wiht polyneuropathy, inadequate co-operation
  Contacts and Locations
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the Contacts provided below. For general information, see Learn About Clinical Studies.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01742650

Locations
Finland
Oulu University Hospital
Oulu, Finland, 90029
Sponsors and Collaborators
University of Oulu
  More Information

No publications provided

Responsible Party: Harri Pakarinen, MD, PhD, University of Oulu
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01742650     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: OYS-7-2009
Study First Received: June 12, 2012
Last Updated: December 2, 2012
Health Authority: Finland: Ethics Committee

Keywords provided by University of Oulu:
ankle; fracture; syndesmosis;

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Ankle Fractures
Wounds and Injuries
Ankle Injuries
Fractures, Bone
Leg Injuries

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on August 20, 2014