Efficacy and Safety Profiles of Combination Sedation Propofol With Midazolam and Pethidine (ERCP)

This study is enrolling participants by invitation only.
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Nisa Netinatsunton, Prince of Songkla University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01709422
First received: September 27, 2012
Last updated: October 17, 2012
Last verified: September 2012
  Purpose

The purpose of this study is to compare combination of propofol and midazolam with pethidine versus midazolam and pethidine for ambulatory ERCP


Condition Intervention
Anesthesia
Drug: Sedation with propofol, midazolam and meperidine.
Drug: Sedation with midazolam and meperidine.

Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Official Title: Efficacy and Safety Profiles of Sedation With Propofol Combined With Intravenous Midazolam and Pethidine Versus Intravenous Midazolam and Pethidine for Ambulatory Endoscopic Retrograde-cholangiopancreatography Cholangiopancreatography

Resource links provided by NLM:


Further study details as provided by Prince of Songkla University:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • Endoscopist's satisfaction,Patient's satisfaction [ Time Frame: Day 1 of ERCP ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    The patient co-operation was rated on ( 1 = poor, 2 = fair, 3 = acceptable, 4 = good, 5 = excellent ) by the endoscopist. The patient were asked to grade the pain by using visual analog scale ( 0 = no pain to 10 = unacceptable pain ) and satisfaction to sedation in the procedure ( 1= unacceptable,2 = extremely uncomfortable, 3 = slightly uncomfortable, 4 = no discomfort)


Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • The cardiovascular and respiratory adverse events [ Time Frame: Day 1 of ERCP ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
    The cardiovascular and respiratory adverse events were defined as (1) desaturation (oxygen saturation < 90 % at least 10 second ) (2) hypotension ( systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg or dropped more than 25 % of baseline ) (3) bradycardia (heart rate < 50 beats/min) and (4) apnea ( cessation of respiratory activity for over 10 seconds ).


Enrollment: 140
Study Start Date: June 2010
Estimated Study Completion Date: November 2012
Primary Completion Date: February 2011 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Arms Assigned Interventions
Active Comparator: Propofol, midzolam, meperidine
Sedation with propofol, midazolam and meperidine: propofol 20 mg then 5-10 mg, midazolam 1 mg in age <= 70 years 0.5 mg in age >70 years , meperidine 20 mg .
Drug: Sedation with propofol, midazolam and meperidine.
propofol 20 mg then 5-10 mg every 30-60 second, midazolam 1 mg in age <= 70 years 0.5 mg in age >70 years , meperidine 20 mg.
Other Name: pethidine
Active Comparator: Midazolam and pethidine
Sedation with midazolam and meperidine ,initial midazolam dose 2-5 mg followed by repeated dose 0.5-1 mg with meperidine, meperidine dose 25-50 mg followed by repeated dose 5-10 mg. The dose of sedative agents were titrated until patients conscious sedation.
Drug: Sedation with midazolam and meperidine.
midazolam 2-5 mg then 0.5-1 mg every 2-3 minute, meperidine 25-50 mg then 5-10 mg every 2-3 minute
Other Name: pethidine

Detailed Description:

ERCP is commonly done under sedation with midazolam and pethidine ,however some studies showed varying outcomes of this conventional sedation for maintained sedation. Propofol is increasing used for sedation in gastrointestinal procedure owing to its rapid recovery profiles but the complications associated with propofol are not negligible.

  Eligibility

Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older
Genders Eligible for Study:   Both
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   Yes
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

. All outpatients aged more than 18 years who were schedule for ERCP -

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnant woman
  • emergency situation ( i.e. concomitant upper gastrointestinal bleeding, acute cholangitis )
  • American Society of Anesthesiologist ( ASA )Class IV or V
  • respiratory disease,
  • sleep apnea
  • allergy to egg or soybean
  • drug abuse( benzodiazepine, opioid agonist )
  • previous history of failure sedation
  Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01709422

Locations
Thailand
NKC Institues of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Prince of Songkla University
Hatyai, Songkhla, Thailand, 90110
Sponsors and Collaborators
Prince of Songkla University
Investigators
Principal Investigator: Nisa Netinatsunton, MD NKC Institue of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Prince of Songklanakarind University
Principal Investigator: Nisa Netinatsunton, MD Prince of Songkla University
  More Information

Additional Information:
No publications provided

Responsible Party: Nisa Netinatsunton, NKC Institute of Gastrornterology and Hepatology, Prince of Songkla University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01709422     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: 1774906506805161
Study First Received: September 27, 2012
Last Updated: October 17, 2012
Health Authority: Thailand: Ethical Committee

Keywords provided by Prince of Songkla University:
Propofol
Midazolam
Pethidine

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Meperidine
Midazolam
Propofol
Analgesics, Opioid
Analgesics
Sensory System Agents
Peripheral Nervous System Agents
Physiological Effects of Drugs
Pharmacologic Actions
Central Nervous System Agents
Therapeutic Uses
Central Nervous System Depressants
Adjuvants, Anesthesia
Narcotics
Anti-Anxiety Agents
Tranquilizing Agents
Psychotropic Drugs
Hypnotics and Sedatives
Anesthetics, Intravenous
Anesthetics, General
Anesthetics
GABA Modulators
GABA Agents
Neurotransmitter Agents
Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 16, 2013