The Effects of Virtual Reality Ultrasound Training in Pairs Compared to Training Alone

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Collaborator:
University of Copenhagen
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Martin G. Tolsgaard, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01703975
First received: October 8, 2012
Last updated: June 26, 2013
Last verified: June 2013
  Purpose

Virtual Reality (VR) simulation has enabled high-quality, safe and efficient training of medical health care providers. However, training costs are considerable and may be optimized using interventions to improve learning. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of training in pairs versus training alone on an VR ultrasound simulator.

Methods: 30 medical students in their final year are randomized to either training in pairs or training alone. All participants are trained for two hours. Subsequently, all students are assessed on ultrasound performance on real patients in an ambulatory setting. Performance is assessed using a rating scale that has been validated in a previous study by two blinded assessors.


Condition Intervention
Learning Outcome
Training Efficiency
Other: Training in pairs (Dyad training)

Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor)

Further study details as provided by Rigshospitalet, Denmark:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • Performance test [ Time Frame: 6 hours ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
    The outcome measure was ultrasound examination skills on pelvic ultrasound examination of patients in an ambulatory setting. Participants were asked to perform a systematic ultrasonic transvaginal examination including measurement of endometrial thickness and estimate the volume of the right ovary. All patients were required to provide written consent to participate. A blinded OB/GYN consultant rated performance using a previously validated rating scale.Sample size calculation and statistical methods.


Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • Confidence [ Time Frame: 6 hours ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Students' confidence in managing the vaginal ultrasound examination are assessed after the post-intervention performance tests


Enrollment: 30
Study Start Date: January 2013
Study Completion Date: June 2013
Primary Completion Date: June 2013 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Arms Assigned Interventions
No Intervention: Single training
Students training alone on the simulator
Experimental: Training in pairs (Dyad Training)
Students training in pairs on the simulator
Other: Training in pairs (Dyad training)

  Show Detailed Description

  Eligibility

Ages Eligible for Study:   20 Months and older
Genders Eligible for Study:   Both
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   Yes
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

Final year medical students

Exclusion Criteria:

Prior extra-curricular ultrasound experience.

  Contacts and Locations
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the Contacts provided below. For general information, see Learn About Clinical Studies.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01703975

Locations
Denmark
Dept. of Fetal Medicine, Juliane Marie Centre
Copenhagen O, Denmark, 2100
Sponsors and Collaborators
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
University of Copenhagen
  More Information

No publications provided

Responsible Party: Martin G. Tolsgaard, MD, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01703975     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: DRVK-35596
Study First Received: October 8, 2012
Last Updated: June 26, 2013
Health Authority: Denmark: Regional Ethical Comitee of the Capital Region

Keywords provided by Rigshospitalet, Denmark:
Simulation efficiency
Collaborative learning

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on October 29, 2014