Prognosis of One-stage Hepatectomy for Bilobar Colorectal Metastases
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
It is not rare that two-stage hepatectomy for multiple bilobar colorectal liver metastases (CLM) be left incomplete because of disease progression or technical reasons. One-stage hepatectomy seems a feasible and safe alternative, however, long-term results are lacking. This study aims to provide evidence that one-stage hepatectomy compelling tumor exposure provides adequate long-term results with low risk of local recurrences.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Liver Metastases |
Procedure: Hepatectomy |
| Study Type: | Observational |
| Study Design: | Observational Model: Cohort Time Perspective: Prospective |
| Official Title: | LONG-TERM RESULTS AFTER ONE-STAGE ULTRASOUND-GUIDED HEPATECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE BILOBAR COLORECTAL LIVER METASTASES: TOWARDS NEW CONCEPTS OF RADICAL RESECTION BY MEANS OF AN INTENTION TO TREAT ANALYSES |
- feasibility on an intention-to-treat basis [ Time Frame: at the time of surgical intervention ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- safety of the procedure [ Time Frame: At 30 and 90 postoperative days ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Peroperative morbidity and mortality as classified according with Dindo-Clavien classification (see ref.); Amount of intraoperative blood loss and blood transfusions.
- reliability of the procedure from an oncological standpoint [ Time Frame: 6-months of minimum follow-up for local recurrences; 5 years actuarial curves for overall survival and time to recurrence ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- the rate of true local recurrence (cut-edge) after a minimum follow-up of 6 months;
- the long-term follow-up, analysing the overall survival (survival after surgery), time to recurrence (survival without recurrence), and time to liver recurrence (survival without liver recurrence).
- the overall survival compared with that based on an intention-to-treat criterion also including the outcome of those patients who met the inclusion criteria but resulted unresectable on exploration.
| Enrollment: | 58 |
| Study Start Date: | September 2001 |
| Study Completion Date: | July 2012 |
| Primary Completion Date: | March 2012 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Groups/Cohorts | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Multiple Bilobar CLM
Patients selected for hepatectomy because carrier of multiple (> or = to 4), bilobar CLM
|
Procedure: Hepatectomy
Intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) criteria for tumor-vessel relations let maximizing the preservation of the hepatic vascular skeleton. Contact between colorectal liver metastases and a major intrahepatic vessel is not by itself a criteria for vessel resection: tumor exposure is not contraindicated. If resection of a hepatic vein (HV), resection of the liver parenchyma drained by that vein is considered or not based on color-flow IOUS findings (hepatofugal blood flow in the feeding portal branch, evidence or not of communicating veins between adjacent HVs, evidence or not of accessory HVs). Parenchymal transection is performed under intermittent clamping by the Pringle maneuver. Drains are always inserted and a chest tube is inserted in patients undergoing thoracophrenolaparotomy. |
Detailed Description:
Eligibility Criteria The prospectively recruited cohort of patients herein analysed is the result of a policy for which those patients considered resectable and presenting 4 or more lesions, bilobar CLM were systematically approached in a one stage operation.
Patients were considered unresectable once there was concomitance of more than 3 lung metastases, diffuse peritoneal carcinomatosis, and/or extra-hilar lymph node metastasis.
Outcome measures The primary outcome was the feasibility on an intention-to-treat basis. To this purpose we studied the ratio between the number of patients surgically explored and those who effectively received resection.
The secondary outcome was the safety of the procedure. To this purpose we studied morbidity, mortality, amount of blood loss, rate of blood transfusions, and postoperative trend of liver function tests.
The tertiary outcome measure was the reliability of the procedure from an oncological standpoint. For this purpose we studied the following:
- the rate of true local recurrence (cut-edge) after a minimum follow-up of 6 months;
- the long-term follow-up, analysing the overall survival (survival after surgery), time to recurrence (survival without recurrence), and time to liver recurrence (survival without liver recurrence).
- the overall survival compared with that based on an intention-to-treat criterion also including the outcome of those patients who met the inclusion criteria but resulted unresectable on exploration.
Eligibility| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
| Sampling Method: | Probability Sample |
Patients with multiple (> or = to 4) and bilobar colorectal liver metastases
Inclusion Criteria:
Those patients considered resectable and presenting 4 or more CLM, involving both liver lobes are systematically approached in a one stage operation.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients carriers of more than 3 lung metastases, and/or diffuse peritoneal carcinomatosis, and/or extra-hilar lymph node metastasis
Contacts and Locations| Italy | |
| Humanitas Cancer Center | |
| Rozzano, Milano, Italy, 20089 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Guido Torzilli, MD, PhD | University of Milan, Humanitas Cancer Center |
More Information
Publications:
| Responsible Party: | Prof. Guido Torzilli, Director Liver Surgery Unit, Humanitas Cancer Center - Associate Professor, University of Milan, University of Milan |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01683357 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | MTX-1STAGE LONG-TERM |
| Study First Received: | September 4, 2012 |
| Last Updated: | September 6, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | Italy: Ministry of Health |
Keywords provided by University of Milan:
|
Liver Metastases Surgery Intraoperative Ultrasound |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Neoplasm Metastasis Neoplasms, Second Primary Liver Neoplasms Neoplastic Processes Neoplasms |
Pathologic Processes Digestive System Neoplasms Neoplasms by Site Digestive System Diseases Liver Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 22, 2013