Safety and Efficacy Study of Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Painful Acute Osteoporotic Spine Fractures
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) is now a therapeutic option for individuals for whom medical management has not been successful or for those who are at risk for developing complications due to long-term immobilization. Recently, three randomized controlled trials (RCT) concerning PVP have been published with conflicting results. Two RCTs with a sham control intervention failed to show an advantage of vertebroplasty over placebo for participants with acute, subacute, and chronic fractures or severe pain. In the third RCT, PVP compared to optimal conservative treatment showed significant immediate postoperative pain relief in the vertebroplasty group, but not at 3 and 12 months. To examine these issues, this study is initiated to compare PVP with conservative therapy in patients with osteoporotic VCFs. Moreover, this study addresses concerns about the possibility that PVP increases the incidence of new compression fractures in adjacent vertebrae.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Acute Osteoporotic Spinal Fractures |
Procedure: Percutaneous vertebroplasty Other: Conservative therapy |
Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Investigational Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Efficacy and Safety Trial |
- VAS score [ Time Frame: at 1 month ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Pain assessment is based on the VAS scale, a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain ever), for which a decrease of 3.0 or more points from baseline is considered to be clinically significant pain relief.
- QUALEFFO total score [ Time Frame: at baseline, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after the treatment. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]QUALEFFO total score is measured with the Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO). This questionnaire consists of 41 items and includes five domains: pain, physical function, social function, general health perception, and mental function.
- ED-5Q score [ Time Frame: at baseline, 1-week, and 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12- month ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]EQ-5D is a standardized instrument utilized as a measure of health-related quality of life outcomes. Furthermore, EQ-5D is one of a few measures recommended for use in cost-effectiveness analyses by the Washington Panel on Cost Effectiveness in Health & Medicine as well as in National guidelines in economic evaluation.
- RMD score [ Time Frame: at baseline, 1-week, and 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12- month ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The RMD questionnaire is a disability questionnaire that measures the functional status of patients with back pain. RMD scores range from 0 to 24, with higher numbers indicating worse physical functioning.
- New vertebral fractures [ Time Frame: at baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 1 year. ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]New vertebral fractures are defined as a decrease (compared with baseline radiographs) of 20% or more, and at least 4 mm, in any of the three vertebral heights (anterior, middle, or posterior) on follow-up.
- Total medical costs [ Time Frame: at 1-month, 12-month ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]This study will calculate total medical costs through summarizing all costs of drugs,family doctor,physiotherapist, hospital stay, and outpatient visits, etc.
| Estimated Enrollment: | 140 |
| Study Start Date: | October 2012 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | August 2014 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | June 2014 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
| Experimental: Percutaneous vertebroplasty |
Procedure: Percutaneous vertebroplasty
Percutaneous vertebroplasty Placement of PMMA into vertebral compression fracture
|
| Active Comparator: Conservative therapy |
Other: Conservative therapy
Conservative therapy mainly consists of optimal pain medication. Pain management is titrated according to patients' needs, including analgesia, bed rest, and physical support (bracing).
|
Detailed Description:
Osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVCFs) are common in the elderly population, with an estimated 1.4 million new fractures occurring every year worldwide. Patients may present with pain and frequently require hospital admission for analgesia, bed rest, and physical support (bracing). While their back pain may last for 6-12 weeks, complications such as pneumonia, decubitus ulcers, venous thromboembolism, and even death may occur. Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) is now a therapeutic option for individuals for whom medical management has not been successful or for those who are at risk for developing complications due to long-term immobilization. Recently, three randomized controlled trials (RCT) concerning PVP have been published with conflicting results. So this study is to compare PVP with conservative therapy in patients with osteoporotic VCFs. Moreover, this study addresses concerns about the possibility that PVP increases the incidence of new compression fractures in adjacent vertebrae.
This study is a multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT), Participants in this study will be allocated randomly to PVP or conservative treatment.All Participants will be asked to fill out standard questionnaires to provide clinical information at baseline (the day of randomization), and at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after the treatment. Cross-over will not be offered before 12 months after randomization. All standard questionnaires (except the 1-day questionnaire) consist of the VAS score, Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO), EQ-5D, and Roland-Morris Disability (RMD) Questionnaire. Furthermore,additional questions about pain treatment, hospital stay, outpatient visits,medical aids, and medical costs will be completed with the help of a nurse practitioner.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 50 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- 50 Years and older
- have a confirmed diagnosis of osteoporosis or osteopenia.
- acute, painful OVCFs from T4-L5
- clinical onset < 6 weeks
- vertebral compression fracture on spine radiograph (minimum 15% height loss)
- Visual Analogue Scale [VAS] score ≥ 4 for pain
Exclusion Criteria:
- severe cardio-pulmonary condition
- untreatable coagulopathy
- active local or systemic infection
- current malignancy, or radicular or caudal compression syndrome
Contacts and Locations| Contact: Gang Sun, M.D | 86153151666277 | cjr.sungang@vip.163.com |
| China, Shandong | |
| The Jinan Military General Hospital | Recruiting |
| Jinan, Shandong, China, 250031 | |
| Principal Investigator: Gang Sun, M.D | |
| Principal Investigator: | Gang Sun, M.D | The Jinan Military General Hospital |
More Information
Additional Information:
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Gang Sun;Chungen Wu;Maoquan Li;Bo Feng, Clinical Professor, Jinan Military General Hospital |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01677806 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | JNMGH20120821 |
| Study First Received: | August 23, 2012 |
| Last Updated: | March 3, 2013 |
| Health Authority: | China: Food and Drug Administration |
Keywords provided by Jinan Military General Hospital:
|
Percutaneous vertebroplasty |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Fractures, Bone Spinal Fractures Wounds and Injuries Spinal Injuries Back Injuries |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 21, 2013