Pulsed Radiofrequency vs. Steroid Injections for Occipital Neuralgia
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The aim of this study is to determine whether pulsed radiofrequency or steroids are better for occipital neuralgia. Seventy-six patients with ON or migraine with tenderness over the occipital nerve who respond to occipital nerve blocks (hereafter included under the broad category "ON") will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either corticosteroid and local anesthetic injections (n=38) or local anesthetic and PRF of the occipital nerve(s) (n=38) for occipital neuralgia. Both patients and the treating & evaluating physicians will be blinded. The first follow-up visit will be at 6 weeks. Patients who obtain significant pain relief will remain in the study. Those patients who fail to obtain any benefit will exit the study and be allowed to crossover to the other treatments or receive alternative care. The second follow-up will be at 3 months and the final follow-up will be at 6-months post-procedure.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Occipital Neuralgia |
Procedure: Pulsed radiofrequency Drug: Corticosteroid injection |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Randomized, Double-blind, Comparative-effectiveness Study Comparing Corticosteroid Injections to Pulsed Radiofrequency for Occipital Neuralgia |
- Average pain score [ Time Frame: 6 weeks after treatment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]0-10 pain score at 6 weeks after treatment
- Number of headache days with severe headache [ Time Frame: 6-weeks after treatment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Number of days with headache greater or equal to 7/10 in past week
- Depression [ Time Frame: 6-weeks after treatment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Measurement of depression 6-weeks after treatment
- Disability [ Time Frame: 6 weeks after treatment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Measurement of headache-related disability 6 weeks after treatment
- Average pain score [ Time Frame: 3 months after treatment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]0-10 pain score 3 months after treatment
- Number of days with severe headache [ Time Frame: 3 months after treatment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Number of days per week with headache greater or equal to 7/10 3 months post-treatment
- Depression [ Time Frame: 3 months after treatment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Measurement of depression 3 months after treatment
- Disability [ Time Frame: 3 months after treatment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Measurement of headache-related disability 3 months after treatment
- Average pain score [ Time Frame: 6 months after treatment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]0-10 pain score 6 months after treatment
- Number of days with severe headache [ Time Frame: 6 months after treatment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Number of days per week with headache greater or equal to 7/10 6 months post-treatment
- Depression [ Time Frame: 6 months after treatment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Measurement of depression 6 months after treatment
- Disability [ Time Frame: 6 months after treatment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Measurement of headache-related disability 6 months after treatment
| Estimated Enrollment: | 76 |
| Study Start Date: | August 2012 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | July 2015 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | December 2014 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Pulsed radiofrequency + local anesthetic injection
Local anesthetic injection plus pulsed radiofrequency over each affected occipital nerve
|
Procedure: Pulsed radiofrequency
Local anesthetic injection and pulsed radiofrequency treatment x 6 minutes over each affected occipital nerve
|
|
Active Comparator: Corticosteroid injection + sham pulsed radiofrequency
Injection with corticosteroid and local anesthetic over the occipital nerve(s)plus "sham" pulsed radiofrequency
|
Drug: Corticosteroid injection
Corticosteroid and local anesthetic injection plus sham pulsed radiofrequency over each affected occipital nerve
|
Detailed Description:
Up to 76 patients referred to one of the participating pain clinic with occipital neuralgia, or migraines with occipital nerve tenderness (dual diagnoses) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio by a computer generated randomization table to receive one of two treatments. Treatments will be randomized at each institution. Within each group, those patients with plain occipital neuralgia, and those with occipital neuralgia with migraines, will be sub-randomized in the same 1:1 ratio. Diagnosis of ON will be made by low-volume (< 3 mL bupivacaine per nerve). Our criterion for a positive response will be > 50% pain relief lasting at least 3 hours. Those individuals who have symptoms in the distribution of both the greater and lesser occipital nerves will receive treatment of both nerves. The greater occipital nerve is more frequently affected than the lesser nerve.
Half (n=38) of the patients will be allocated to receive local anesthetic & corticosteroid injections at each nerve (group I), with an equal number allocated to receive local anesthetic & PRF at each (group II). In those patients who request sedation, an intravenous will be inserted and light sedation administered with low doses of midazolam and fentanyl, in accordance with our standard clinic practice. Treatment in all patients will be accomplished using 20-gauge radiofrequency needles with 10 mm active tips. Prior to treating, electrical stimulation will be performed to ensure ample proximity to the targeted nerve(s), with our target threshold being concordant stimulation at < 0.3 volts at each site.
Once proper needle position is ensured, those in group I will receive an injection at each nerve containing 30 mg of depomethylprednisolone mixed with 2 mL of a 50:50 mixture of 2% lidocaine and 0.5% bupivacaine (2.75 mL). Anywhere between 1 and 4 nerves can be injected, with 4 nerves being targeted if a patient had bilateral lesser and greater occipital nerve involvement. This will be followed by 3 cycles of sham PRF at 120 s per cycle, with slight (approximately 30o electrode adjustments between cycles. For sham PRF, no electrical field or heat is generated (i.e. the machine is not set to any radiofrequency cycle after stimulation), but the cycle times (120 s per cycle) are adhered to (i.e. we will wait a total of 6", 2" per cycle). Those patients in group II will receive injections at each nerve containing 2.75 mL of a solution with 2 mL of 50:50 2% lidocaine and 0.5% bupivacaine + 0.75 mL saline (2.75 mL), followed by 3 cycles of PRF using the following standard settings: voltage output 40-60 V; 2 Hz frequency; 20 ms pulses in a 1-second cycle, 120 second duration per cycle; impedance range between 150 and 400 Ohms; and 42o C plateau temperature.
No patient will be prescribed additional medications or therapy between their procedure and first follow-up. However, they will be allowed to remain on their current, stable analgesic regimen. Rescue medications will consist of tramadol 50 mg 1 to 2 tablets every 6 hours PRN (up to 8/d) and/or acetaminophen or a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug such as ibuprofen, diclofenac or ketorolac on an "as needed" basis.
Follow-ups will be performed by a physician blinded to treatment allocation. The first follow-up visit will be scheduled 6-weeks from the start of treatment. A positive outcome will be defined as a > 50% decrease in headache coupled with a positive satisfaction rating (> 3 on a 0-5 scale). Subjects who obtain a positive outcome at their initial 6-week follow-up visit will remain in the study and return for their 3-month follow-up visit. Those with a negative outcome will exit the study "per protocol" to receive standard care. Subjects who obtain a positive outcome at 1-month but experience a recurrence before their 3-month follow-up visit will also exit the study per protocol, with their final outcome measures recorded before they receive standard care. Those who obtain a positive outcome at 3-months will remain in the study for their final 6-month follow-up, while those who obtain a negative outcome will exit the study. Unblinding for both patients and the treating physician will be after the patient exits the study or after their final follow-up visit for those with continued benefit.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age greater or equal to 18 years
Occipital neuralgia diagnosed based on history & physical exam and diagnostic local anesthetic blocks, or migraine with occipital nerve(s) tenderness that responds to diagnostic blocks.
a. Greater or equal to 50% relief based on diagnostic local anesthetic block of the greater and/ or lesser occipital nerves that lasts for at least 90 minutes with lidocaine or 3 hours with bupivacaine or ropivacaine 20
- Baseline Numerical Rating Scale average pain score > 4/10
- Frequency of greater or equal to 4/10 pain for at least 10 days per month
Exclusion Criteria:
- Untreated coagulopathy
- Automatic implantable cardiac defibrillator or pacemaker that cannot be temporarily disabled for medical reasons
- Previous pulsed radiofrequency
- Other sources of headache, such as tension-type headache, cervicogenic headache, migraine headache without occipital neuralgia, and other causes (e.g. tumors, congenital abnormalities etc.). Those that can be confused with ON must be excluded based on history and exam (e.g. cervicogenic headaches), symptoms (tension-type headache), response to blocks (all of the above); and lab work (temporal arteritis, which would be confirmed by biopsy after an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate).
- Serious medical or uncontrolled or severe psychiatric -
Contacts and Locations| Contact: Steven P Cohen, MD | 410-955-1822 | scohen40@jhmi.edu |
| Contact: Connie Kurihara, RN | 301-400-2595 | conniekurihara@gmail.com |
| United States, Maryland | |
| Johns Hopkins | Recruiting |
| Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21205 | |
| Contact: Steven P Cohen, MD 410-955-1822 scohen40@jhmi.edu | |
| Contact: Lee Peterlin, MD 410-550-9550 lpeterlin@jhmi.edu | |
| Principal Investigator: Steven Cohen, MD | |
| Sub-Investigator: Lee Peterlin, DO | |
| Walter Reed National Military Medical Center | Recruiting |
| Bethesda, Maryland, United States, 20889 | |
| Contact: Connie Kurihara, RN 301-400-2595 conniekurihara@gmail.com | |
| Principal Investigator: Steven P Cohen, MD | |
| Sub-Investigator: David Jamison, MD | |
| Sub-Investigator: Michael Jacobs, MD | |
More Information
Publications:
| Responsible Party: | Steven P. Cohen, Professor, Johns Hopkins University |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01670825 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 373481-3 |
| Study First Received: | August 19, 2012 |
| Last Updated: | April 1, 2013 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institional Review Board |
Keywords provided by Johns Hopkins University:
|
Occipital neuralgia corticosteroid injection pulsed radiofrequency |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Neuralgia Pain Neurologic Manifestations Nervous System Diseases Peripheral Nervous System Diseases Neuromuscular Diseases Signs and Symptoms Anesthetics, Local |
Anesthetics Central Nervous System Depressants Physiological Effects of Drugs Pharmacologic Actions Sensory System Agents Peripheral Nervous System Agents Central Nervous System Agents Therapeutic Uses |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 23, 2013