Comparison of Weaning on Pressure Support vs. Proportional Assist Ventilation: A Pilot Study
The study hypothesis is that reducing patient-ventilator asynchrony will reduce time required to wean from mechanical ventilation. The purpose of this pilot study is (1) to assess study feasibility in terms of recruitment, protocol adherence and efficacy of the intervention for reducing asynchrony, (2) to assess baseline rates of asynchrony and outcomes in the control arm in order to perform sample size calculations, if needed, for further, larger studies designed to detect differences in weaning time in specific, predefined populations and (3) to examine how often ineffective triggering (and therefore reduced ventilator respiratory rate) at higher levels of pressure support lead to a false conclusion that higher levels of support are needed to diminish respiratory distress.
|Study Design:||Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Treatment
|Official Title:||Is Respiratory Rate an Adequate Indicator of Respiratory Distress During Weaning? A Comparison of Weaning on Pressure Support vs. Proportional Assist Ventilation.|
- Duration of weaning [ Time Frame: From time of randomization up to 28 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Duration of weaning will be assessed as (a) the time elapsed from study randomization until the patient successfully passes a spontaneous breathing trial, (b) time from randomization to successful extubation, and (c) number of ventilator-free days, defined as the number of days alive and free of mechanical ventilation during the 28 days post randomization. All patients enrolled in the study will be followed until discharge from ICU. A prior subgroup analysis is planned for patients with a high asynchrony index at baseline.
- Change in asynchrony index from baseline [ Time Frame: Measurement of flow, airway pressure, and estimate of respiratory muscle pressure recorded at baseline then again, at high and at low levels of support during the first seven days of the weaning protocol ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Asynchrony index (percent (%) of asynchronous breaths) measured by visual inspection of flow and airway pressure tracings at baseline (just prior to randomization) and at high and low levels of support in both Proportional Assist Ventilation (PAV) and Pressure Support Ventilation (PSV) weaning algorithms. These measurements are recorded during the first seven days post randomization.
- Change in sedative drug administration from baseline [ Time Frame: Daily dose of sedative drugs administered at baseline and day 1, 3, and 7 of study protocol ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Total dose of sedative and narcotic drugs (converted into lorazepam and morphine equivalents) administered on day 0 (baseline) and day 1, 3 and 7 of study protocol, as percentage of baseline dose
- Delirium [ Time Frame: Up to 28 days post randomization ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Incidence of a positive delirium screening assessment (using Confusion Assessment Method - Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) or Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC)) at baseline, and duration of delirium as a percentage of time in ICU post randomization.
- Tolerance of weaning mode [ Time Frame: Daily, up to 28 days post randomization ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Number of hours spent daily on prescribed weaning mode (PAV or PSV)
- Indication for increased ventilatory support [ Time Frame: Daily ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Respiratory therapists will indicate on a checklist what signs of respiratory distress were present that led to an increase in level of support from the ventilator.
|Study Start Date:||March 2009|
|Estimated Study Completion Date:||July 2013|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date:||September 2012 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)|
Active Comparator: Proportional Assist Ventilation (PAV)
Proportional Assist Ventilation (PAV+ on the PB840 ventilator) will be used according to a weaning algorithm. If patients develop distress despite maximum levels of support on PAV+, they will be temporarily switched to assist control mode.
Proportional Assist Ventilation will be used until patient is extubated.
Active Comparator: Pressure Support Ventilation (PSV)
Pressure Support Ventilation on the PV840 ventilator will be used according to a weaning algorithm. If patients develop distress despite maximal level of support on PSV, they will be temporarily switched to assist-control mode.
Pressure Support Ventilation will be used until patient is extubated
Previous research has shown that approximately twenty-five percent of patients capable of triggering the ventilator in assisted modes have high rates of patient-ventilator asynchrony, and that such patients have a longer duration of mechanical ventilation. It is not known whether asynchrony is a cause of weaning failure or simply a marker of more severe respiratory failure. The most common type of asynchrony, ineffective triggering, may be both a marker of respiratory disease and a cause of delayed weaning. During ineffective triggering, the patient's inspiratory effort fails to trigger a ventilator breath, and thus the respiratory rate displayed on the ventilator underestimates the patient's true, intrinsic respiratory rate. Since ineffective triggering is more common at higher levels of pressure support than lower levels, an increase in respiratory rate during weaning of pressure support may indicate the development of respiratory distress or simply the abolition of ineffective triggering. Ineffective triggering may also cause delayed weaning because respiratory muscle energy is "wasted" on non-supported breaths. Proportional assist ventilation (PAV) is an FDA- and HPB-approved mode of ventilation in which the ventilator applies pressure in proportion to patient effort. Using PAV, patient-ventilator interaction may be optimized and ineffective triggering greatly reduced. Since the patient and ventilator respiratory rates are generally equivalent, a reduction in respiratory rate with increasing ventilatory support is less likely to be false positive indication of the need for greater assistance.
In this study, patients with difficulty weaning from mechanical ventilation will be randomized to weaning with one of two weaning protocols: Proportional Assist Ventilation (PAV) weaning algorithm (intervention arm) vs. Pressure Support Ventilation (PSV) weaning algorithm (control arm).
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01666054
|Contact: Karen J Bosma, MD, FRCPC||519-663-3531||KarenJ.Bosma@lhsc.on.ca|
|Contact: Tracey C Bentall, CCRP||519-685-8500 ext 32546||TraceyC.Bentall@lhsc.on.ca|
|London Health Sciences Centre - University Hospital||Recruiting|
|London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5A5|
|Principal Investigator:||Karen J Bosma, MD, FRCPC||Lawson Health Research Institute|