Prevention of Phantom Limb Pain After Transtibial Amputation (PLATA)
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Phantom limb pain following amputation is a major problem. Current evidence how to best prevent phantom limb pain is equivocal because previous trials have included small numbers of patients, and tested heterogeneous patient collectives. There is some evidence that optimized perioperative pain control is effective in preventing phantom limb pain, but the potential added role of regional anesthesia has not been defined.
Objective:
The Aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that sciatic nerve block decreases the point prevalence of phantom limb pain 12 months after transtibial amputation for peripheral vascular disease compared to optimized intravenous pain therapy.
Study design:
Randomized, prospective, double-blind (patient, physician, statistician) clinical trial. All patients will receive standard optimized intravenous anesthesia and analgesia (opiate patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), intravenous ketamine). Patients in the intervention group will receive additional infusion of local anesthetic via a sciatic nerve catheter placed under ultrasound guidance.
Main outcome of this study:
Point prevalence of chronic phantom limb pain after 12 months.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Phantom Limb Pain Chronic Pain Prevention |
Procedure: Sciatic name block |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Prevention of Phantom Limb Pain After Transtibial Amputation (PLATA) - Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled, Multi-center Trial Comparing Optimized Intravenous Pain Control vs Optimized Intravenous Pain Control Plus Nerve Block. |
- Point prevalence of chronic phantom limb pain [ Time Frame: 12 months after amputation ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Estimated Enrollment: | 400 |
| Study Start Date: | April 2013 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | April 2016 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | April 2016 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Nerve block
Optimized intravenous pain treatment during surgery and for 7 days postoperatively. Definition: strong opioid patient-controlled analgesia, non-opioids, ketamine intravenously. Sciatic nerve block: infusion of local anesthetic. |
Procedure: Sciatic name block
Ultrasound-guided sciatic nerve block.
|
|
Active Comparator: Control
Optimized intravenous pain treatment during surgery and for 7 days postoperatively. Definition: strong opioid patient-controlled analgesia, non-opioids, ketamine intravenously. Sciatic nerve block: saline infusion. |
Procedure: Sciatic name block
Ultrasound-guided sciatic nerve block.
|
Detailed Description:
Rationale:
Phantom limb pain following amputation is a major clinical problem. Current evidence how to best prevent phantom limb pain is equivocal because previous trials have included small numbers of patients, and tested heterogeneous patient collectives. There is some evidence that optimized perioperative pain control is effective in preventing phantom limb pain, but the potential added role of regional anesthesia has not been defined.
Objective:
The Aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that sciatic nerve block decreases the point prevalence of phantom limb pain 12 months after transtibial amputation for peripheral vascular disease compared to optimized intravenous pain therapy.
Study design:
Randomized, prospective, double-blind (patient, physician, statistician) clinical trial. All patients will receive standard optimized intravenous anesthesia and analgesia (opiate patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), intravenous ketamine). Patients in the intervention group will receive additional infusion of local anesthetic via a sciatic nerve catheter placed under ultrasound guidance.
Study population:
Patients undergoing elective transtibial amputation for peripheral vascular disease at one of the participating centres, ASA status II to IV.
Intervention:
Infusion of local anesthetic via sciatic nerve catheter placed under ultrasound guidance.
Main study parameter/endpoint:
Point prevalence of chronic phantom limb pain after 12 months.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness:
All patients, regardless of group allocation, will receive optimalized intravenous pain treatment. The aim of this study is to assess whether additional regional anesthesia (ultrasound-guided sciatic nerve block) can decrease the incidence of phantom limb pain. The working hypothesis is that patients undergoing intervention treatment (optimized intravenous therapy plus nerve block) are expected to feature a decreased incidence of phantom limb pain at 12 months, in addition to improved perioperative analgesia.
The administration of both optimalized intravenous pain treatment and peripheral nerve blockade is routine clinical practice for many procedures on the lower leg, including amputation. The risk of this intervention can be described as very low. In control patients, the sciatic catheter will be used for rescue pain treatment.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients undergoing elective transtibial amputation for peripheral vascular disease
- age over 18 years
- American Society of Anaesthesiology status II to IV
Exclusion Criteria:
- contraindication to peripheral regional anesthesia
- psychiatric disease
- pregnancy or breastfeeding status
- amputation for tumour surgery
- traumatic amputation
- inability to give written and informed consent.
Contacts and Locations| Contact: Philipp Lirk, MD | +31(20)566 ext 4032 | p.lirk@amc.uva.nl |
| Contact: ESA Research Committee | +32(2)7433290 | research@esahq.org |
| Netherlands | |
| Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam | Not yet recruiting |
| Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands, 1105AZ | |
| Study Chair: | Markus Hollmann, MD PhD | Dept. of Anaesthesiology, Academic Medical Center / University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands |
| Principal Investigator: | Philipp Lirk, MD | Dept. of Anaesthesiology, Academic Medical Center / University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands |
More Information
Publications:
| Responsible Party: | Philipp Lirk, Attending Anesthesiologist, Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01626755 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | PLATA |
| Study First Received: | June 21, 2012 |
| Last Updated: | August 2, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | Netherlands: Central Commission for Clinical Research (CCMO) |
Keywords provided by Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA):
|
Phantom limb pain Chronic pain Amputation Peripheral vascular disease |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Phantom Limb Perceptual Disorders Neurobehavioral Manifestations |
Neurologic Manifestations Nervous System Diseases Signs and Symptoms |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 16, 2013