Closed Loop Stimulation for Neuromediated Syncope (SPAIN Study)
This study is currently recruiting participants.
Verified June 2012 by Spanish Society of Cardiology
Sponsor:
Gonzalo Barón-Esquivias, MD, PhD, FESC
Collaborator:
Biotronik SE & Co. KG
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Gonzalo Barón-Esquivias, MD, PhD, FESC, Spanish Society of Cardiology
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01621464
First received: June 11, 2012
Last updated: June 15, 2012
Last verified: June 2012
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Physiological stimulation therapy effectiveness will be proved with contractility sensor or CLS sensor (Closed Loop Stimulation), in BIOTRONIK CLS pacemakers to prevent from neuromediated syncope. Furthermore, not only will be investigated if this system eradicates syncopes, but also if the number of presyncopal episodes is reduced.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Syncope, Vasovagal |
Device: Pacemaker with Closed Loop Stimulation (CLS sensor) |
Phase 4 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator) Primary Purpose: Prevention |
| Official Title: | Closed Loop Stimulation for Neuromediated Syncope |
Resource links provided by NLM:
Further study details as provided by Spanish Society of Cardiology:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- Reduction of number of syncopes [ Time Frame: 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Demonstrate that pacing therapy regulated by an inotropic sensor (CLS) is effective for the suppression of the neuromediated syncope
Secondary Outcome Measures:
- Time reduction to the first syncope [ Time Frame: 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Time reduction to 1st syncope: Time from the implantation to the 1st recurrence of the syncope.
- Reduction of the recurrence of presyncopal symptoms [ Time Frame: 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Reduction of the recurrence of presyncopal symptoms: Since the CLS sensor can detect any changes in contractility, and presyncopal symptoms are preceded by a contractility increase, it is thought that CLS group patients will suffer less from these symptoms.
- Improvement of Quality of Life [ Time Frame: 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Improvement of Quality of Life: Syncope produces uncertainties and fear to the patients. This will be checked if pacemaker implant improves QOL of these patients and if a specific programming scheme influences the outcome.
| Estimated Enrollment: | 60 |
| Study Start Date: | May 2006 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | June 2013 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | March 2013 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Placebo Comparator: Control
Pacemaker implanted but NO pacing (mode DDI, 30 bpm and sub-threshold)
|
Device: Pacemaker with Closed Loop Stimulation (CLS sensor)
Crossover: 1 year at control group and 1 year at CLS group (randomized which group goes first)
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: CLS group
pacemaker implanted programmed with the contractility sensor activated (mode DDD-CLS)
|
Device: Pacemaker with Closed Loop Stimulation (CLS sensor)
Crossover: 1 year at control group and 1 year at CLS group (randomized which group goes first)
Other Names:
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 40 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients that fulfill the requirements of the study:
- Patients with 5 previous neuromediated syncopes
- Positive Tilt test, Cardioinhibitory response, heart rate < 40 bpm for at least 10'' or pauses > 3''
- Patient ≥ 40 years
- No cardiopathy present
Patients without the following contraindications:
- Drug treatment with β-blockers
- Chronic Polyneuropathy
- All contraindications for DDD or DDDR pacing (as per clinical guidelines SEC, 2002)
- Geographically stable patients and able to attend all follow ups
- Patients that have signed the informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients that do NOT fulfill the inclusion criteria mentioned above
- Patients with the contraindications indicated above
- Patients with syncopes due to Carotid Sinus Hypersensitivity
- Other syncope causes different to the CNS
- Patients involved in other clinical studies
- Pregnant women or in age bearing that are not using at least 2 contraception methods
Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01621464
Contacts
| Contact: Gonzalo Barón Esquivias, MD PhD FESC | gonzalo.baron.sspa@juntadeandalucia.es |
Locations
| Spain | |
| Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío | Recruiting |
| Sevilla, Spain, 41013 | |
| Principal Investigator: Gonzalo Barón Esquivias, MD PhD FESC | |
Sponsors and Collaborators
Gonzalo Barón-Esquivias, MD, PhD, FESC
Biotronik SE & Co. KG
Investigators
| Principal Investigator: | Gonzalo Barón Esquivias, MD PhD FESC | Spanish Society of Cardiology |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Gonzalo Barón-Esquivias, MD, PhD, FESC, member of Syncope Working Group (within Section of Electrophysiology and Arrhythmias), Spanish Society of Cardiology |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01621464 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | SPAIN |
| Study First Received: | June 11, 2012 |
| Last Updated: | June 15, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | Spain: Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios |
Keywords provided by Spanish Society of Cardiology:
|
Neuromediated syncope Tilt test Pacemaker CLS sensor |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Syncope Syncope, Vasovagal Unconsciousness Consciousness Disorders Neurobehavioral Manifestations Neurologic Manifestations |
Nervous System Diseases Signs and Symptoms Orthostatic Intolerance Primary Dysautonomias Autonomic Nervous System Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 16, 2013