Screening for Coronary Artery Disease Using Fluoroscopy During Coronary Angiography
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of screening using the fluoroscopy-save function on reduction of radiation exposure and quality of angiogram during cardiac catheterization when compared to traditional cinematography-guided coronary angiography.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Coronary Artery Disease |
Other: Fluoroscopy-save group Other: Standard technique |
Phase 4 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Diagnostic |
| Official Title: | Efficacy of Fluoroscopy-save Function During Cardiac Catheterization |
- Measure of radiation exposure to the patient [ Time Frame: During coronary angiography ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Surface peak skin dose, as measured by the Gafchromic XR RV3 film strip, which is placed under the patient's back during the procedure.
- Dose area product from coronary angiography system [ Time Frame: During coronary angiography ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Quality of angiogramsOne extra picture will be taken at random using the mode that the study was not randomized to. These 2 pictures from each study will then be collated and put together in no particular order with all identifiers removed. These single pictures will be read by 2 interventional cardiologists not involved in the study in a blinded fashion and degree of correlation between the fluoroscopy-save picture and cinematography picture will be recorded.
- 30-day events [ Time Frame: 30 days post-procedure ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
| Enrollment: | 50 |
| Study Start Date: | April 2012 |
| Study Completion Date: | September 2012 |
| Primary Completion Date: | August 2012 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Fluoroscopy-save group
Coronary anatomy visualized under fluoroscopy, documented using the fluoroscopy-save function, and further visualized using cinematography only when higher quality is necessary (fluoroscopy-save technique)versus
|
Other: Fluoroscopy-save group
Coronary anatomy visualized under fluoroscopy, documented using the fluoroscopy-save function, and further visualized using cinematography only when higher quality is necessary (fluoroscopy-save technique) versus Coronary anatomy visualized and documented using cinematography alone (standard technique)
|
|
Active Comparator: Standard technique
Coronary anatomy visualized and documented using cinematography alone (standard technique)
|
Other: Standard technique
Coronary anatomy visualized under fluoroscopy, documented using the fluoroscopy-save function, and further visualized using cinematography only when higher quality is necessary (fluoroscopy-save technique) versus Coronary anatomy visualized and documented using cinematography alone (standard technique)
|
Detailed Description:
The study will be a prospective, randomized study of patients undergoing clinically-indicated coronary angiograpy in the New York University (NYU) Langone Medical Center cardiac catheterization laboratory. Patients will be randomized to one of two coronary angiography protocols: (1) Coronary anatomy visualized under fluoroscopy, documented using the fluoroscopy-save function, and further visualized using cinematography only when higher quality is necessary (fluoroscopy-save technique) versus (2) Coronary anatomy visualized and documented using cinematography alone (standard technique). The primary outcome will be a measure of radiation exposure to the patient, surface peak skin dose, as measured by the Gafchromic XR RV3 film strip, which is placed under the patient's back during the procedure. Other outcome measures will include radiation output recorded by the fluoroscopy machine, amount of contrast used, and quality of angiograms performed. To determine if the quality of the angiograms performed using the fluoroscopy-save technique is non-inferior to the standard technique, one extra picture will be taken at random using the mode that the study was not randomized to. For example, in the fluoroscopy-save group, a picture that was not visualized under cinematography during the study will be repeated and documented under cinematograpy. In the standard group, a picture will be repeated and documented using the fluoroscopy-save function. These 2 pictures from each study will then be collated and put together in no particular order with all identifiers removed. These single pictures will be read by 2 interventional cardiologists not involved in the study in a blinded fashion. The degree of coronary artery disease as determined by these 2 readers will be compared between the fluoroscopy-save picture and cinematography picture.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients will be recruited from the cardiac catheterization laboratory at the NYU Langone Medical Center.
- Patients will be eligible if they are more than 18 years of age and are referred for coronary angiography.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients will be excluded if they have reduced renal function since they must receive as minimal of contrast amount as possible, and if their abdominal circumference is > 45 inches since the quality of images under fluoroscopy alone is poorer in patients with increased abdominal girth.
Contacts and Locations| United States, New York | |
| New York University School of Medicine | |
| New York, New York, United States, 10016 | |
| Principal Investigator: | James Slater, MD | New York University School of Medicine |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | James Slater, Director of Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, New York University School of Medicine |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01605045 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | S12-00007 |
| Study First Received: | May 10, 2012 |
| Last Updated: | October 11, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |
Keywords provided by New York University School of Medicine:
|
Cardiac catheterization Radiation |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Coronary Artery Disease Myocardial Ischemia Coronary Disease Heart Diseases |
Cardiovascular Diseases Arteriosclerosis Arterial Occlusive Diseases Vascular Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 16, 2013