Reducing Radioisotope Dose: the Half-Dose CZT Study
This study is not yet open for participant recruitment.
Verified January 2012 by The Methodist Hospital System
Sponsor:
The Methodist Hospital System
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
The Methodist Hospital System
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01518777
First received: January 23, 2012
Last updated: January 25, 2012
Last verified: January 2012
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
This is a pilot study to see whether cardiac imaging can be performed using half the standard dose of radioisotope.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Coronary Artery Disease |
Radiation: Comparison of the image quality of the half-dose (cadmium zinc telluride) CZT versus full dose scans |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Diagnostic |
| Official Title: | Reducing Radioisotope Dose in Regadenoson SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: Comparison of Half-Dose Scans Using a Novel Solid-State-Detector Dedicated Cardiac Camera to Full Dose Scans Acquired On Standard Equipment |
Resource links provided by NLM:
Further study details as provided by The Methodist Hospital System:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- Image quality of the half-dose CZT versus full dose scans [ Time Frame: 1 Week ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Secondary Outcome Measures:
- Total radiation dose/exposure of the half-dose CZT vs. full dose scans [ Time Frame: 1 Week ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Total myocardial count activity and count rates obtained during each scan [ Time Frame: 1 Week ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Agreement between the half-dose CZT vs. full dose scans on the presence and extent of fixed or reversible defects on a per-patient and vessel basis [ Time Frame: 1 Week ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Agreement between the half-dose vs. full dose scans on gated data such as EF, left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic volume, LV end-systolic volume [ Time Frame: 1 Week ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Estimated Enrollment: | 200 |
| Study Start Date: | January 2012 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | December 2014 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | December 2014 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
Intervention Details:
Detailed Description:
-
Radiation: Comparison of the image quality of the half-dose (cadmium zinc telluride) CZT versus full dose scans
Half the standard radioisotope dose used in conventional imaging will be administered to patients undergoing a CZT SPECT over an extended period of time in comparison to patients receiving a standard full radioisotope dose scan performed on a conventional SPECT camera.
The aim of this study is to compare the image quality of the half radioisotope dose scans obtained using a CZT (cadmium zinc telluride) camera with scans acquired using a standard of care imaging protocol/radioisotope dose performed on a traditional (conventional) camera.
The proposed strategy of a half dose/extended time protocol with the CZT camera should yield a similar count activity and consequently image quality equivalent to that detected by a conventional SPECT system.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 90 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- ≥ 18 years of age and referred for a clinically-indicated stress SPECT MPI study
- suspected or known coronary artery disease
- written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Evidence of a normal baseline scan after at least 50% of the protocol acquired baseline scans have been interpreted as being normal
- Participation in another investigational study within the preceding month
- Pregnant and/or breast-feeding female
- ECG evidence of left bundle branch block or paced rhythm
- Evidence of non-ischemic cardiomyopathy
- Presence of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and/or severe valvular heart disease
- Severe claustrophobia or inability to lie flat for 20 minutes (the anticipated amount of time to complete the procedure)
- Known allergy to technetium-99m
- Potential contraindications to regadenoson use, due to severe lung disease; severe bradycardia (heart rate < 40 beats/min); second- or third degree atrioventricular heart block; sick sinus syndrome; long QT syndrome; severe hypotension; or decompensated heart failure.
Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01518777
Contacts
| Contact: Glenda Santua, RN | 713-441-3914 | gksantua@tmhs.org |
Locations
| United States, Texas | |
| The Methodist Hospital | Not yet recruiting |
| Houston, Texas, United States, 77030 | |
| Contact: Glenda Santua, RN 713-441-3914 gksantua@tmhs.org | |
| Principal Investigator: John J Mahmarian, MD | |
| Sub-Investigator: Su-Min Chang, MD | |
| Sub-Investigator: Faisal Nabi, MD | |
Sponsors and Collaborators
The Methodist Hospital System
Investigators
| Principal Investigator: | John J Mahmarian, MD | The Methodist Hospital System |
More Information
Publications:
| Responsible Party: | The Methodist Hospital System |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01518777 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | Pro00006818 |
| Study First Received: | January 23, 2012 |
| Last Updated: | January 25, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |
Keywords provided by The Methodist Hospital System:
|
Coronary Artery Disease |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Coronary Artery Disease Myocardial Ischemia Coronary Disease Heart Diseases |
Cardiovascular Diseases Arteriosclerosis Arterial Occlusive Diseases Vascular Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 16, 2013