Evaluation of the MP Diagnostics HTLV Blot 2.4
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The purpose of this study is:
- To assess the validity and reproducibility of the MP Diagnostics HTLV Blot 2.4.
- To conduct a sensitivity analysis of the HTLV Blot 2.4 using a known positive population.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
HTLV-I Infections HTLV-II Infections Human T-lymphotropic Virus 1 Human T-lymphotropic Virus 2 HTLV I Associated T Cell Leukemia Lymphoma HTLV I Associated Myelopathies |
Other: CDPHL Algorithm |
| Study Type: | Observational |
| Study Design: | Observational Model: Cohort Time Perspective: Retrospective |
| Official Title: | Evaluation of the MP Diagnostics HTLV Blot 2.4 |
| Estimated Enrollment: | 600 |
| Study Start Date: | November 2011 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | June 2012 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | January 2012 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Groups/Cohorts | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
EIA Negative
Blood donor specimens that tested non-reactive by previously licensed HTLV screening assay.
|
Other: CDPHL Algorithm
Supplemental testing algorithm performed by the CDPHL.
|
|
EIA Repeat Reactive
Blood donor specimens that tested repeat reactive by previously licensed HTLV screening assay, but are unconfirmed.
|
Other: CDPHL Algorithm
Supplemental testing algorithm performed by the CDPHL.
|
|
Known Positive
Blood donor specimens that tested repeat reactive with a licensed HTLV screening assay and have been confirmed through additional, unlicensed supplemental testing.
|
Other: CDPHL Algorithm
Supplemental testing algorithm performed by the CDPHL.
|
Detailed Description:
This is a retrospective study designed to assess the validity and reproducibility of the MP Diagnostics IVD device, the HTLV Blot 2.4 (MP Blot), in various populations. The study will be conducted at three geographical distinct locations.
The validity of the MP Blot will be assessed by calculating the following:
- Percent negative agreement with CDPHL Algorithm on 200 EIA negative specimens
- Percent positive agreement with CDPHL Algorithm on 200 EIA repeat reactive specimens
The sensitivity of the MP Blot will be evaluated by testing 200 known positive specimens. The study will be performed using three product lots at three clinical sites.
The reproducibility of the MP Blot will be assessed by testing two replicates of a three member panel at three clinical testing sites with each of three lots of product over multiple days by three operators.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
| Sampling Method: | Non-Probability Sample |
All populations are from whole blood donors.
Inclusion Criteria:
EIA Negative Population
- Male or female
- Completion of a health history evaluation for routine donor screening
- Willing and able to provide informed consent
- Negative screening assay results for all ARC screening assays
EIA Repeat Reactive Population
- Male or female
- Completion of a health history evaluation for routine donor screening
- Willing and able to provide informed consent
- Previous RR result by bioMerieux ELISA, Abbott EIA, and / or Abbott ChLIA PRISM
Known Positive Population
- Male or female
- Willing and able to provide informed consent
- Previous reactive screening test using either the bioMerieux ELISA, the Abbott EIA or the Abbott ChLIA PRISM, followed by supplemental testing
Exclusion Criteria:
EIA Negative Population
- Inadequate sample volume for testing
- Unable to provide samples that meet the sample suitability requirements for testing
- Positive screening result for any infectious disease tested by ARC
EIA Repeat Reactive Population
- Inadequate sample volume for testing
- Unable to provide samples that meet the sample suitability requirements for testing
- Positive result for HIV, HBV, HCV, or any other infectious disease
Known Positive Population
- Unwilling or unable to provide informed consent
- Unable to provide adequate sample volume for testing
- Unable to provide samples that meet the sample suitability requirements for testing
- Positive result for HIV
Contacts and Locations| United States, California | |
| California Department of Public Health | |
| Richmond, California, United States, 94804 | |
| United States, Missouri | |
| LABS, Inc | |
| St. Louis, Missouri, United States, 38611 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Susan Stramer, Ph.D | American Red Cross |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | MP Biomedicals, LLC |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01467024 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | MP-EIA-HTLV-001B |
| Study First Received: | October 31, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | November 7, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration |
Keywords provided by MP Biomedicals, LLC:
|
HTLV Confirmatory Supplemental |
Blot HTLV-I HTLV-II |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Paraparesis, Tropical Spastic Bone Marrow Diseases Spinal Cord Diseases HTLV-I Infections HTLV-II Infections Leukemia Leukemia, T-Cell Leukemia-Lymphoma, Adult T-Cell Lymphoma Virus Diseases Hematologic Diseases Central Nervous System Diseases Nervous System Diseases Deltaretrovirus Infections |
Retroviridae Infections RNA Virus Infections Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes Immune System Diseases Neoplasms by Histologic Type Neoplasms Leukemia, Lymphoid Lymphoproliferative Disorders Lymphatic Diseases Immunoproliferative Disorders Myelitis Central Nervous System Viral Diseases Central Nervous System Infections |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 22, 2013