Staple-line Reinforcement During Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Using Three Different Techniques: a Randomized Trial
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
University of Rome Tor Vergata
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Paolo Gentileschi, University of Rome Tor Vergata
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01459471
First received: October 4, 2011
Last updated: October 21, 2011
Last verified: October 2011
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The main drawback of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the severity of post-operative complications. Staple line reinforcement (SLR) is strongly advocated.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Complication of Surgical Procedure Leak; Blood |
Procedure: Bariatric surgery |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Staple-line Reinforcement During Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Using Three Different Techniques: a Randomized Trial |
Resource links provided by NLM:
Further study details as provided by University of Rome Tor Vergata:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- safety of staple line reinforcement during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy by measuring the number of adverse effects, i.e. bleeding and leaks. [ Time Frame: six months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]a comparison between three techniques of staple line reinforcement. The number of adverse events will be registered and analyzed
| Enrollment: | 120 |
| Study Start Date: | April 2010 |
| Study Completion Date: | September 2010 |
| Primary Completion Date: | September 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
| Experimental: bleeding, leak, operative time |
Procedure: Bariatric surgery
Staple line reinforcement during sleeve gastrectomy
Other Names:
|
Detailed Description:
The aim of this study was to prospectively and randomly compare three different techniques of SLR during LSG: oversewing (group A), buttressed transection with a polyglycolide acid and trimethylene carbonate (group B) and staple-line roofing with a gelatin fibrin matrix (group C).
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 28 Years to 59 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Morbidly obese patients waiting for sleeve gastrectomy
Exclusion Criteria:
- BMI<35 Kg/m2,
- Important comorbidities
Contacts and Locations
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Paolo Gentileschi, Professor, University of Rome Tor Vergata |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01459471 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | SEND-11-0905 |
| Study First Received: | October 4, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | October 21, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | Italy: Ethics Committee |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 16, 2013