Intravenous Lacosamide Compared With Fosphenytoin in the Treatment of Patients With Frequent Nonconvulsive Seizures (TRENdS)
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
This a phase 2 study comparing the efficacy of intravenous (IV) lacosamide (LCM) with IV fosphenytoin (fPHT) in controlling frequent nonconvulsive seizures (NCSs), the Adverse Events profile of LCM compared with fPHT when used to treat frequent NCSs, and length of stay in an intensive care unit for subjects treated with LCM versus subjects treated with fPHT. The trial will include a preacute-treatment period, an acute-treatment period, a postacute-treatment period, and a long-term follow-up period.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Nonconvulsive Seizures |
Drug: Lacosamide - 'Crossover' Drug: Fosphenytoin - 'crossover' |
Phase 2 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Investigator) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Utility of Intravenous Lacosamide Compared With Fosphenytoin in the Treatment of Patients With Frequent Nonconvulsive Seizures |
- Percentage of subjects who experience no NCSs for 24 hours following treatment with LCM vs. fPHT, as measured by continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) monitoring. [ Time Frame: 26-68 hours ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Percentage of subjects who experience no NCSs for 24 hours following treatment with LCM vs. fPHT, as measured by cEEG monitoring.
- Percentage of subjects who require a rebolus of the initial antiepileptic drug (AED) to control NCSs in the LCM vs fPHT arms. [ Time Frame: 26-68 hours ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Percentage of subjects who require a rebolus of the initial AED to control NCSs in the LCM vs fPHT arms.
- Percentage of subjects who require a second AED to control NCSs. [ Time Frame: 26-68 hours ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Percentage of subjects who require a second AED to control NCSs.
- Percent change in seizure time (defined as the number of minutes of electrographic seizure (ESz) activity per hour) before treatment and at the end of the first treatment arm. [ Time Frame: 26-68 hours ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Percent change in seizure time (defined as the number of minutes of ESz activity per hour) before treatment and at the end of the first treatment arm.
- Percent change in seizure time (defined as the number of minutes of ESz activity per hour) before treatment and at the end of the second treatment arm. [ Time Frame: 26-68 hours ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Percent change in seizure time (defined as the number of minutes of ESz activity per hour) before treatment and at the end of the second treatment arm.
- Time from bolus to time of the end of the last seizure for both first (initial bolus/rebolus)and second (crossover bolus/rebolus) treatment arms. [ Time Frame: 26-68 hours ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Time from bolus to time of the end of the last seizure for both first (initial bolus/rebolus)and second (crossover bolus/rebolus) treatment arms.
- Frequency of predefined adverse events (AEs) in the LCM vs fPHT arms. [ Time Frame: 26-68 hours ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Frequency of predefined AEs in the LCM vs fPHT arms.
- Percentage of subjects in whom study drug is withdrawn early [ Time Frame: 26-68 hours ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Percentage of subjects in whom study drug is withdrawn early
- Days in the intensive care unit/hospital from start of treatment in the LCM vs fPHT arms. [ Time Frame: 26-68 hours ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Days in the intensive care unit/hospital from start of treatment in the LCM vs fPHT arms.
- Functional status as measured by the Functional Disability Scale at Day 7 to 9 postrandomization and Day 30 post-randomization in the LCM vs fPHT arms. [ Time Frame: 7-32 Days ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Functional status as measured by the Functional Disability Scale at Day 7 to 9 postrandomization and Day 30 post-randomization in the LCM vs fPHT arms.
- Percentage of all subjects who have had a seizure, are on AED therapy, and are alive/dead at the 6-, 12-, and 24-month post-randomization follow-ups. [ Time Frame: 6-24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Percentage of all subjects who have had a seizure, are on AED therapy, and are alive/dead at the 6-, 12-, and 24-month post-randomization follow-ups.
| Estimated Enrollment: | 200 |
| Study Start Date: | May 2012 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | December 2013 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | December 2013 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: fPHT
fPHT treatment arm, a bolus of 20 mg PE/kg will be administered at a rate of no greater than 75 mg PE/minute. If a further bolus is required, 5 mg PE/kg will be administered. The daily maintenance dose for fPHT will be 5 mg PE/kg divided into 2 doses.
|
Drug: Lacosamide - 'Crossover'
If any of the following occurs, the subject will have reached the end of the first treatment arm and will "cross over" and begin receiving the other drug, ie, the one not originally administered:
If crossover occurs, the subject will "start over" with the second drug, going through the same observation-only period, rebolusing (if necessary), and study assessments with the second drug, beginning with the Baseline assessments. Other Name: Vimpat
|
|
Experimental: LCM
LCM treatment arm, a bolus of 400 mg will be administered over 30 minutes. If a further bolus is required, 200 mg will be administered. Regardless of whether the subject received a rebolus, he or she will begin receiving a maintenance dose 12 hours after the initial dose. The daily maintenance dose will be the same as the total bolus (400 mg or 600 mg) divided into 2 doses.
|
Drug: Fosphenytoin - 'crossover'
If any of the following occurs, the subject will have reached the end of the first treatment arm and will "cross over" and begin receiving the other drug, ie, the one not originally administered:
If crossover occurs, the subject will "start over" with the second drug, going through the same observation-only period, rebolusing (if necessary), and study assessments with the second drug, beginning with the Baseline assessments. |
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Have the capacity to understand and sign an institutional review board (IRB)-approved informed consent form (ICF) or have a legally authorized representative (LAR) available to sign on behalf of the subject.
- Are undergoing cEEG monitoring in the neurologic intensive care unit (NICU) or other closely monitored environment.
Are experiencing NCSs according to the following criteria:
- At least 1 ESz lasting at least 10 seconds, with or without clinical correlates, occurring within the last 6 hours of cEEG monitoring.
- If a new AED has been started, ESzs must have occurred per the preceding bullet point at least 2 hours after starting that AED.
- If individual ESzs are not well defined, ESz time is at least 10 seconds and less than 30 minutes per hour of cEEG recording.
- Are being considered for treatment with an IV AED.
- Are at least 18 years old.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Treatment with PHT, fPHT, or LCM in the last 7 days.
- Contraindication for the use of fPHT or LCM.
- Ongoing generalized convulsive status epilepticus (SE) (more than 2 generalized tonic-clonic seizures within 30 minutes without recovery to baseline or 1 seizure lasting longer than 10 minutes).
- Episodes of SE, defined as at least 30 minutes of ESz activity in 1 hour, in the last 6 hours.
- Encephalopathic event secondary to acute anoxic/hypoxic event.
- Undergoing therapeutic hypothermia protocol.
- Continuous EEG monitoring showing only periodic discharges or rhythmic delta activity without clear ESzs (for definitions of periodic discharges, rhythmic delta activity, and ESzs, see the Manual of Operations).
- Electroencephalographic seizures consistent with typical absence seizures.
- Evaluation for spell characterization or surgical treatment for epilepsy.
- Pregnancy.
Contacts and Locations| United States, California | |
| Huntington Memorial Hospital | Recruiting |
| Pasadena, California, United States, 91109 | |
| Contact: Sadie Seto 626-397-3882 sadie.seto@huntingtonhospital.com | |
| Principal Investigator: Yafa Minazad, MD | |
| United States, Connecticut | |
| Yale University School of Medicine | Recruiting |
| New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06520 | |
| Contact: Jennifer Bonito 203-785-3638 jennifer.bonito@yale.edu | |
| Principal Investigator: Lawrence Hirsch, MD | |
| United States, Georgia | |
| Emory University School of Medicine | Recruiting |
| Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30307 | |
| Contact: Melanie Newman 404-778-4249 mnewma2@emory.edu | |
| Principal Investigator: Suzette LaRoche, MD | |
| United States, Massachusetts | |
| Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center | Recruiting |
| Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215 | |
| Contact: Allison Glasgow 617-667-0324 alglasgo@bidmc.harvard.edu | |
| Principal Investigator: Susan Herman, MD | |
| Brigham and Woman's Hospital | Recruiting |
| Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215 | |
| Contact: Nichelle Llewellyn 617-732-5423 NLLEWELLYN@PARTNERS.ORG | |
| Principal Investigator: Jong Lee, MD | |
| Massachusetts General Hospital | Recruiting |
| Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02214 | |
| Contact: Samantha Donovan 617-643-4617 SRDONOVAN@partners.org | |
| Principal Investigator: Brandon Westover, MD | |
| United States, North Carolina | |
| Mission Hospital | Recruiting |
| Asheville, North Carolina, United States, 28801 | |
| Contact: Leslie Shell 828-213-7993 leslie.shell@msj.org | |
| Principal Investigator: Jennifer Jones, MD | |
| Duke University Medical Center | Recruiting |
| Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710 | |
| Contact: Brian Mace 919-684-0081 brian.mace@duke.edu | |
| Principal Investigator: Bradley Kolls, MD | |
| United States, Pennsylvania | |
| University of Pittsburgh Medical Center | Recruiting |
| Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213 | |
| Contact: Sharon DeCesare 412-647-4994 decesx@upmc.edu | |
| Principal Investigator: Maria Baldwin, MD | |
| United States, South Carolina | |
| Medical University of South Carolina | Recruiting |
| Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425 | |
| Contact: Ashley Gnatt gantt@musc.edu | |
| Principal Investigator: Jonathan Halford, MD | |
| United States, Tennessee | |
| Vanderbilt University Medical Center | Recruiting |
| Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232 | |
| Contact: Melissa Osborn 615-322-8817 melissa.osborn@vanderbilt.edu | |
| Principal Investigator: Amir Arain, MD | |
| United States, Texas | |
| University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas | Not yet recruiting |
| Dallas, Texas, United States, 75390-8589 | |
| Contact: Jan Cameron-Watts 214-648-0363 jan.cameronwatts@utsouthwestern.edu | |
| Principal Investigator: Puneet Gupta, MD | |
| Principal Investigator: | Aatif Husain, MD | Duke Clinical Research Institute |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Aatif Husain, MD, Duke University Medical Center |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01458522 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | Pro00033295, DCRI-CEMC101.01, Pro00037794 |
| Study First Received: | October 20, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | April 17, 2013 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration United States: Institutional Review Board |
Keywords provided by Duke University:
|
Nonconvulsive Seizures |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Seizures Epilepsy Brain Diseases Central Nervous System Diseases Nervous System Diseases Neurologic Manifestations Signs and Symptoms |
Fosphenytoin Phenytoin Anticonvulsants Central Nervous System Agents Therapeutic Uses Pharmacologic Actions |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on June 17, 2013