Implantation of Endobronchial Valves Versus Intrabronchial Valves in Patients With Severe Heterogeneous Emphysema
This study is currently recruiting participants.
Verified October 2011 by University of Heidelberg
Sponsor:
University of Heidelberg
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Felix JF Herth, University of Heidelberg
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01457833
First received: October 19, 2011
Last updated: October 21, 2011
Last verified: October 2011
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Patients with advanced heterogeneous emphysema experience improvement in clinical outcomes in the same way following either implantation of endobronchial valves or intrabronchial valves.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Pulmonary Emphysema |
Device: EBV implantation Device: IBV implantation |
Phase 2 Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Endoscopic Lung Volume Reduction by Implantation of Endobronchial Valves (EBV) vs. Intrabronchial Valves (IBV) in Patients With Severe Heterogeneous Emphysema |
Resource links provided by NLM:
Further study details as provided by University of Heidelberg:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- Improvement in pulmonary function (FEV1 and RV/TLC) [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Secondary Outcome Measures:
- Number of severe adverse events [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Evaluation of valve migration rate [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Average changes in pulmonary function (FEV1, IVC, RV, TLC, RV/TLC) [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Average changes in 6-minute-walk-distance [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Estimated Enrollment: | 50 |
| Study Start Date: | August 2011 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | May 2012 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | May 2012 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Endobronchial valves (EBV)
Complete occlusion of one emphysematous destroyed lobe by implantation of endobronchial valves
|
Device: EBV implantation
In severe cases of COPD even optimum treatment involving bronchodilatation with drugs, physical training and possibly oxygen therapy is unable to influence exercise capacity and the perception of dyspnoea to a sufficient extent. Given the assumption that the elastic recoil of the small airways can be improved by a reduction in lung volume and pulmonary function overall by more ergonomic breathing mechanics and diaphragm function, various endoscopic procedures for lung volume reduction are available. The most advanced technique is the implantation of valves. The one-way mechanism of these valves allows air to be expelled during exspiration without any influx of air during inspiration.
Other Name: (Zephyr EBV)
|
|
Active Comparator: Intrabronchial valves (IBV)
Complete occlusion of one emphysematous destroyed lobe by implantation of intrabronchial valves
|
Device: IBV implantation
In severe cases of COPD even optimum treatment involving bronchodilatation with drugs, physical training and possibly oxygen therapy is unable to influence exercise capacity and the perception of dyspnoea to a sufficient extent. Given the assumption that the elastic recoil of the small airways can be improved by a reduction in lung volume and pulmonary function overall by more ergonomic breathing mechanics and diaphragm function, various endoscopic procedures for lung volume reduction are available. The most advanced technique is the implantation of valves. The one-way mechanism of these valves allows air to be expelled during exspiration without any influx of air during inspiration.
Other Name: (Spiration IBV)
|
Detailed Description:
Patient enrollment and data acquisition is to be carried out on a prospective basis. It is planned to enroll a total of 50 patients with advanced heterogeneous emphysema. After decision to undertake endoscopic lung volume reduction by valve implantation patients will be randomised to two treatment arms. 25 patients receive unilateral IBV treatment or unilateral EBV treatment in each case. All patients will undergo treatment at one study centre in Heidelberg.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 30 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- pulmonary function: FEV1 < 45 %, RV > 150 %, TLC > 100 %
- heterogeneous emphysema
Exclusion Criteria:
- homogeneous emphysema
- significant bronchiectasis
- severe concomitant diseases
- pregnancy
Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01457833
Contacts
| Contact: Daniela Gompelmann, MD | +49(0)62213968087 | daniela.gompelmann@thoraxklinik-heidelberg.de |
| Contact: Felix JF Herth, MD | +49(0)62213961200 | felix.herth@thoraxklinik-heidelberg.de |
Locations
| Germany | |
| Thoraxklinik Heidelberg | Recruiting |
| Heidelberg, Germany, 69126 | |
| Contact: Daniela Gompelmann, MD +49(0)62213968087 daniela.gompelmann@thoraxklinik-heidelberg.de | |
| Principal Investigator: Daniela Gompelmann, MD | |
Sponsors and Collaborators
University of Heidelberg
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Felix JF Herth, Professor MD, University of Heidelberg |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01457833 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | Protokoll E1.0-23.05.2011 |
| Study First Received: | October 19, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | October 21, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | Germany: Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Emphysema Pulmonary Emphysema Pathologic Processes Lung Diseases Respiratory Tract Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 22, 2013