Survival of Different Core Build-up Materials
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to compare three different core build-up materials for dental use. The study hypothesis is that there is no differences in survival rate of the different core build-ups.
| Condition |
|---|
|
Dental Prosthesis Failure |
| Study Type: | Observational |
| Study Design: | Observational Model: Cohort Time Perspective: Prospective |
| Official Title: | Core Build-up Materials: a Randomized Clinical Study |
| Estimated Enrollment: | 300 |
| Study Start Date: | November 2011 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | November 2016 |
| Groups/Cohorts |
|---|
| Rebilda DC |
| Clearfil Core DC |
| Multicore Flow |
Detailed Description:
Core build-ups replace dental structures which are decayed through caries or tooth fractures. Often there are necessary before insertion of dental restorations. In clinical practice, there are two main material groups: glass ionomer cements and composites. Because of there good physical properties the composite materials claimed to fulfill the expected criteria of core build-ups. However, some of these composite core build-ups get lost before insertion of definite prosthetic restorations. The current prospective, randomized controlled study should investigate the survival rate of three different composite materials: "Rebilda DC", "Clearfil Core DC" and "Multicore Flow". The statistical analysis will performed with logistic regression performed by the institute of institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, university of heidelberg. The study hypothesis is that there is no differences in the survival rate.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 80 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
| Sampling Method: | Probability Sample |
Patients of the department of porsthodontics, university of heidelberg
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients need a single crown or fixed dental prostheses
- patients are able to signed inform consent form, more than 18 years,
Exclusion Criteria:
- no pregnant women
- insufficient oral hygiene
Contacts and Locations| Contact: Brigitte Ohlmann, PD Dr. | 0049-6221-5637573 | Brigitte_Ohlmann@med.uni-heidelberg.de |
| Germany | |
| Department of prosthodontics, university of heidelberg | Not yet recruiting |
| Heidelberg, Germany, 69120 | |
| Sub-Investigator: Andreas Zenthoefer | |
| Principal Investigator: | Peter Rammelsberg, Prof. Dr. | University of Heidelberg |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Brigitte Ohlmann, PD Dr. med. dent. Brigitte Ohlmann, University of Heidelberg |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01449903 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | Proth-003 |
| Study First Received: | October 6, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | October 10, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | Germany: Ethics Commission |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Prosthesis Failure Postoperative Complications Pathologic Processes |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on June 17, 2013