Is Verapamil In TransRadial Interventions OmittabLe? (VITRIOL)
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Background. Verapamil is routinely used in transradial procedures to prevent the spasm of the radial artery (RAS). However, verapamil has deleterious side effects and it is contraindicated in patients with reduced left ventricular systolic function, aortic stenosis, significant bradycardia, myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock and/or high grade AV block.
Methods. To test the hypothesis, whether verapamil is omittable, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial is conducted. Patients receive either 5 mg verapamil IA (diluted with saline, n≈300) or placebo (saline alone, n≈300). Rate of access site conversions is compared as primary safety endpoint. Rate of code breaks (composite of access site crossovers and extra use of vasodilators), frequency of vasodilator use, procedural and fluoroscopic time, contrast volume, subjective pain of the patients are analyzed as secondary endpoints. Subanalysis of code breaks determining the underlying cause (RAS or anatomical variation) is also performed and in case of RAS the efficacy of ad hoc administered verapamil is determined. Assuming a conversion rate of 2.0% in the verapamil group, the study is a priori adequately powered (>80%) to detect a 5.0% difference in crossovers.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Coronary Disease Verapamil Toxicity |
Drug: Verapamil Drug: Placebo |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator) |
| Official Title: | Omission of Prophylactic Verapamil Use in Transradial Coronary Interventions |
- Rate of access site conversions [ Time Frame: Occurrence of access site conversion will be assessed within 1 minute after completion of coronary angiography or intervention. ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Rate of code breaks [ Time Frame: Occurrence of code breaking will be assessed within 1 minute after completion of coronary angiography or intervention. ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Code break: a composite of access site conversion and extra use of vasodilators.
- Rate of vasodilator use [ Time Frame: Vasodilator use will be assessed within 1 minute after completion of coronary angiography or intervention. ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Procedural time [ Time Frame: Procedural time will be assessed within 1 minute after completion of coronary angiography or intervention. ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Fluoroscopic time [ Time Frame: Fluoroscopic time will be assessed within 1 minute after completion of coronary angiography or intervention. ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Contrast volume [ Time Frame: The amount of contrast medium will be assessed within 1 minute after completion of coronary angiography or intervention. ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Subjective pain [ Time Frame: Subjective pain will be assessed within 1 minute after completion of coronary angiography or intervention. ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Measured using a semiquantitative scale ranging from 1 to 6.
| Enrollment: | 591 |
| Study Start Date: | March 2011 |
| Study Completion Date: | August 2011 |
| Primary Completion Date: | August 2011 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
| Active Comparator: Verapamil |
Drug: Verapamil
Intraarterial administration of 5 mg verapamil diluted with saline to 10 mL.
|
| Placebo Comparator: Placebo |
Drug: Placebo
Intraarterial administration of 10 mL saline.
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients undergoing transradial coronary angiography and/or percutaneous coronary intervention
- successful cannulation of the radial artery
Exclusion Criteria:
- reduced left ventricular systolic function (LVEF<35%)
- significant aortic stenosis
- bradycardia (<50/min.)
- myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock and/or high grade AV block
Contacts and Locations| Hungary | |
| State Health Center | |
| Budapest, Hungary, 1134 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Istvan Hizoh, MD, PhD | State Health Center, Budapest, Hungary |
| Study Chair: | Robert Gabor Kiss, MD, PhD | State Health Center, Budapest, Hungary |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Istvan Hizoh, MD, PhD, Senior Consultant, State Health Center, Hungary |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01402427 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | SHCCARD-001 |
| Study First Received: | July 21, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | April 15, 2013 |
| Health Authority: | Hungary: Institutional Ethics Committee |
Keywords provided by State Health Center, Hungary:
|
Coronary Artery Disease Coronary Angiography Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Transradial |
Radial Artery Spasm Verapamil Adverse Effects |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Coronary Disease Coronary Artery Disease Myocardial Ischemia Heart Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases Vascular Diseases Arteriosclerosis Arterial Occlusive Diseases Verapamil Diltiazem |
Vasodilator Agents Cardiovascular Agents Therapeutic Uses Pharmacologic Actions Anti-Arrhythmia Agents Calcium Channel Blockers Membrane Transport Modulators Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Antihypertensive Agents |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 22, 2013