Pressure-wire Guided PTCA: Drug Eluting Stent Versus Drug Eluting Balloon (WinDEB Study)
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The aim of the study is to show the safety and efficacy of the SeQuent® Please (Drug Eluting Balloon or DEB) vs. commonly used Drug Eluting Stents in the treatment of small vessel disease and side branches by pressure wire guided percutaneous coronary intervention.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Coronary Artery Disease |
Device: Angioplasty performed via Paclitaxel Eluting Balloon catheter Device: Angioplasty via DES |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single Blind |
| Official Title: | Pressure Wire-guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Small Vessels or Side Branches: Functional Outcome of Drug-Eluting Stent (DES) Versus Drug-Eluting Balloon (DEB) With Provisional Bare Metal Stent Implantation |
- Loss in fractional flow reserve (FFR) at 6 months for both treatment groups [ Time Frame: 6 month ]
- Occurrence of acute (up to 48 hours), subacute (up to 30 days) and late stent thrombosis [ Time Frame: acute: <48h; subacute: < 30days ]
- NACCE rate at 30 days, 6 and 12 months [ Time Frame: 30days, 6 and 12 month ]
- Procedural success
- Percent in-stent stenosis, in-segment stenosis, in-stent late lumen loss and in-segment late lumen loss at 6 months follow-up [ Time Frame: 6 month ]Percent in-stent stenosis, in-segment stenosis, in-stent late lumen loss and in-segment late lumen loss at 6 months follow-up
- Angiographic in-stent restenosis rate of the target lesion (≥ 50 % stenosis) at 6 months from the procedure [ Time Frame: 6 month ]
- Angiographic in-segment stenosis rate of the target lesion (≥ 50 % stenosis) at 6 months from the procedure [ Time Frame: 6 month ]
- Indication for premature follow-up
- Target vessel failure
| Study Start Date: | August 2011 |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: DEB + BMS
Paclitaxel drug-eluting balloon (DEB) dilatation and bare metal stenting
|
Device: Angioplasty performed via Paclitaxel Eluting Balloon catheter |
| Active Comparator: Stenting with commonly used Drug Eluting Stents (DES) |
Device: Angioplasty via DES
Angioplasty performed via commonly used Drug Eluting Stents
|
Detailed Description:
This study is a randomized, prospective, multi-center, efficacy study with a DES control group assessing the 6-month loss in FFR in patients treated with the "matrix coated paclitaxel-eluting PTCA-balloon catheter" SeQuent® Please and commonly used DES for small vessel de novo and side branch lesions. 100 patients will be studied in total with two equivalent treatment groups DEB & DES of 50 patients each.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients of at least 18 years of age.
- Patients with stable angina pectoris (CCS class 1-3) or with unstable angina pectoris (Braunwald class 1-2, A-C) or documented ischemia or with documented silent ischemia
- Patients must agree to undergo the angiographic 6-month and clinical follow-ups at 12 and 36 months.
- De novo coronary lesions including side branches in native coronary arteries (reference vessel between ≥ 2.0 and ≤ 3.0 mm, lesion length ≤ 25 mm as angiographically documented)
- Diameter stenosis pre procedure must be either ≥ 70 % or ≥ 50 % if ischemia corresponding to the target lesion is documented either by exercise stress ECG, stress echocardiography, scintigraphy, MRT, or suspected based on angina pectoris.
- Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) must be less or equal to 0.75.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with a life expectancy of less than 12 months
- Patients that were treated with one or more DES during the last 12 months which would not allow 3-month dual antiplatelet therapy if the patient were randomized in the DEB treatment group.
- Patients who are obliged to be on dual antiplatelet aggregation therapy for more than 3 months following study inclusion
- Patients with acute (< 24 h) or recent (48 hours) myocardial infarction
- Patients with severe congestive heart failure or with severe heart failure NYHA IV or with severe valvular heart disease
- Patients demonstrating clinical signs of cardiogenic shock at the time of the procedure (systolic blood pressure of less than 80 mmHg requiring inotropic support, IABP and/or fluid challenge)
- DES treated lesion(s) during the last 12 months.
- Thrombus burden (STEMI, NSTEMI) and/or total occlusion in the culprit segment
- In-segment stenosis of the native vessel within the 5 mm adjacent to the stent
Contacts and Locations
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Thomas Neunteufl, MD, Univ. Klinik für Innere Medizin II; Department of Cardiology |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01399463 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | MUWCard18022011 |
| Study First Received: | July 20, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | July 20, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | Austria: Federal Ministry of Health |
Keywords provided by Medical University of Vienna:
|
Drug Eluting Stent, Drug Eluting Balloon, Fractional Flow Reserve, DES, DEB, FFR |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Coronary Artery Disease Myocardial Ischemia Coronary Disease Heart Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases Arteriosclerosis Arterial Occlusive Diseases Vascular Diseases Diethylstilbestrol Paclitaxel Estrogens, Non-Steroidal Estrogens |
Hormones Hormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone Antagonists Physiological Effects of Drugs Pharmacologic Actions Tubulin Modulators Antimitotic Agents Mitosis Modulators Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic Antineoplastic Agents Therapeutic Uses |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 19, 2013