Trial record 2 of 23 for:
colostomy | Open Studies
Primary Prevention of Peristomial Hernias Via Parietal Prostheses
This study is currently recruiting participants.
Verified March 2013 by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
Sponsor:
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01380860
First received: June 22, 2011
Last updated: March 26, 2013
Last verified: March 2013
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to compare rates of hernia formation between colostomies created with no hernia preventing mesh versus colostomies created with a particular mesh.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Parastomal Hernia |
Procedure: Colostomy with mesh implantation Procedure: Simple colostomy |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Prevention |
| Official Title: | Primary Prevention of Peristomial Hernias Via Parietal Prostheses: a Randomized, Multicentric Study |
Resource links provided by NLM:
Further study details as provided by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- Presence/absence of a peristomal hernia [ Time Frame: 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]The occurrence of peristomal hernias is determined in both groups every three months up until 24 months. The presence of absence of a hernia is detected by clinical exam, and at 24 months by an additional radiology exam. The primary outcome concerns rates at 24 months, primo-events only.
Secondary Outcome Measures:
- Presence/absence of peristomal hernia [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]The presence of absence of a hernia is detected by clinical exam.
- Days of hospitalisation [ Time Frame: 1 month ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The number of days spent in the hospital after the surgical intervention.
- Operating time (minutes) [ Time Frame: Day 1 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Estimation of blood loss during the operation (ml) [ Time Frame: Day 1 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Was stomal repair necessary for the patient? yes/no [ Time Frame: 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Was relocation of the colostomy required? yes/no [ Time Frame: 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Presence/absence of complications [ Time Frame: 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Complications include: retraction, stenosis, prolapse, disunion, necrosis, abcess, infections, occlusion, strangulation, perforation, eczema, dermatitis, erythema, ulceration
- Patient difficulty for fitting his/her colostomy with the appropriate sac. [ Time Frame: 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]A visual analog scale is used to determine how difficult it is for a patient to fit his/her colostomy with an appropriate device. 0: perfect adhesion; 10: the device does not adjust to the shape of my skin, and I have permanent leakage.
- Pain around the colostomy [ Time Frame: 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of pain around the stomy site.
- Abdominal pain [ Time Frame: 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of abdominal pain.
- Pain medication consumption [ Time Frame: 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Number of colostomy leaks per day [ Time Frame: 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Number of colostomy sac changes per day [ Time Frame: 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Does the patient consider fitting a sac to his/her colostomy to be a difficult task? yes/no [ Time Frame: 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Questionnaire Stoma-QOL [ Time Frame: 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Validated assessment of quality of life.
- Exposition of the prothesis (mesh): yes/no [ Time Frame: 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Questionnaire Stoma-QOL [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Validated assessment of quality of life.
- Questionnaire Stoma-QOL [ Time Frame: 1 month ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Validated assessment of quality of life.
- Presence/absence of peri-operative complications [ Time Frame: Day 1 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Pain around the colostomy [ Time Frame: Day 1 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of pain around the stomy site.
- Pain around the colostomy [ Time Frame: 1 month ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of pain around the stomy site.
- Pain around the colostomy [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of pain around the stomy site.
- Pain around the colostomy [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of pain around the stomy site.
- Pain around the colostomy [ Time Frame: 9 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of pain around the stomy site.
- Pain around the colostomy [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of pain around the stomy site.
- Pain around the colostomy [ Time Frame: 15 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of pain around the stomy site.
- Pain around the colostomy [ Time Frame: 18 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of pain around the stomy site.
- Pain around the colostomy [ Time Frame: 21 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of pain around the stomy site.
- Abdominal pain [ Time Frame: Day 1 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of abdominal pain.
- Abdominal pain [ Time Frame: 1 month ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of abdominal pain.
- Abdominal pain [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of abdominal pain.
- Abdominal pain [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of abdominal pain.
- Abdominal pain [ Time Frame: 9 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of abdominal pain.
- Abdominal pain [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of abdominal pain.
- Abdominal pain [ Time Frame: 15 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of abdominal pain.
- Abdominal pain [ Time Frame: 18 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of abdominal pain.
- Abdominal pain [ Time Frame: 21 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of abdominal pain.
- Presence/absence of peristomal hernia [ Time Frame: 1 month ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]The presence of absence of a hernia is detected by clinical exam.
- Presence/absence of peristomal hernia [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]The presence of absence of a hernia is detected by clinical exam.
- Presence/absence of peristomal hernia [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]The presence of absence of a hernia is detected by clinical exam.
- Presence/absence of peristomal hernia [ Time Frame: 9 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]The presence of absence of a hernia is detected by clinical exam.
- Presence/absence of peristomal hernia [ Time Frame: 15 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]The presence of absence of a hernia is detected by clinical exam.
- Presence/absence of peristomal hernia [ Time Frame: 18 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]The presence of absence of a hernia is detected by clinical exam.
- Presence/absence of peristomal hernia [ Time Frame: 21 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]The presence of absence of a hernia is detected by clinical exam.
- Presence/absence of complications [ Time Frame: 1 month ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Complications include: retraction, stenosis, prolapse, disunion, necrosis, abcess, infections, occlusion, strangulation, perforation, eczema, dermatitis, erythema, ulceration
- Presence/absence of complications [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Complications include: retraction, stenosis, prolapse, disunion, necrosis, abcess, infections, occlusion, strangulation, perforation, eczema, dermatitis, erythema, ulceration
- Presence/absence of complications [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Complications include: retraction, stenosis, prolapse, disunion, necrosis, abcess, infections, occlusion, strangulation, perforation, eczema, dermatitis, erythema, ulceration
- Presence/absence of complications [ Time Frame: 9 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Complications include: retraction, stenosis, prolapse, disunion, necrosis, abcess, infections, occlusion, strangulation, perforation, eczema, dermatitis, erythema, ulceration
- Presence/absence of complications [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Complications include: retraction, stenosis, prolapse, disunion, necrosis, abcess, infections, occlusion, strangulation, perforation, eczema, dermatitis, erythema, ulceration
- Presence/absence of complications [ Time Frame: 15 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Complications include: retraction, stenosis, prolapse, disunion, necrosis, abcess, infections, occlusion, strangulation, perforation, eczema, dermatitis, erythema, ulceration
- Presence/absence of complications [ Time Frame: 18 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Complications include: retraction, stenosis, prolapse, disunion, necrosis, abcess, infections, occlusion, strangulation, perforation, eczema, dermatitis, erythema, ulceration
- Presence/absence of complications [ Time Frame: 21 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Complications include: retraction, stenosis, prolapse, disunion, necrosis, abcess, infections, occlusion, strangulation, perforation, eczema, dermatitis, erythema, ulceration
- Patient difficulty for fitting his/her colostomy with the appropriate sac. [ Time Frame: Day 1 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]A visual analog scale is used to determine how difficult it is for a patient to fit his/her colostomy with an appropriate device. 0: perfect adhesion; 10: the device does not adjust to the shape of my skin, and I have permanent leakage.
- Patient difficulty for fitting his/her colostomy with the appropriate sac. [ Time Frame: 1 month ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]A visual analog scale is used to determine how difficult it is for a patient to fit his/her colostomy with an appropriate device. 0: perfect adhesion; 10: the device does not adjust to the shape of my skin, and I have permanent leakage.
- Patient difficulty for fitting his/her colostomy with the appropriate sac. [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]A visual analog scale is used to determine how difficult it is for a patient to fit his/her colostomy with an appropriate device. 0: perfect adhesion; 10: the device does not adjust to the shape of my skin, and I have permanent leakage.
- Patient difficulty for fitting his/her colostomy with the appropriate sac. [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]A visual analog scale is used to determine how difficult it is for a patient to fit his/her colostomy with an appropriate device. 0: perfect adhesion; 10: the device does not adjust to the shape of my skin, and I have permanent leakage.
- Patient difficulty for fitting his/her colostomy with the appropriate sac. [ Time Frame: 9 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]A visual analog scale is used to determine how difficult it is for a patient to fit his/her colostomy with an appropriate device. 0: perfect adhesion; 10: the device does not adjust to the shape of my skin, and I have permanent leakage.
- Patient difficulty for fitting his/her colostomy with the appropriate sac. [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]A visual analog scale is used to determine how difficult it is for a patient to fit his/her colostomy with an appropriate device. 0: perfect adhesion; 10: the device does not adjust to the shape of my skin, and I have permanent leakage.
- Patient difficulty for fitting his/her colostomy with the appropriate sac. [ Time Frame: 15 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]A visual analog scale is used to determine how difficult it is for a patient to fit his/her colostomy with an appropriate device. 0: perfect adhesion; 10: the device does not adjust to the shape of my skin, and I have permanent leakage.
- Patient difficulty for fitting his/her colostomy with the appropriate sac. [ Time Frame: 18 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]A visual analog scale is used to determine how difficult it is for a patient to fit his/her colostomy with an appropriate device. 0: perfect adhesion; 10: the device does not adjust to the shape of my skin, and I have permanent leakage.
- Patient difficulty for fitting his/her colostomy with the appropriate sac. [ Time Frame: 21 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]A visual analog scale is used to determine how difficult it is for a patient to fit his/her colostomy with an appropriate device. 0: perfect adhesion; 10: the device does not adjust to the shape of my skin, and I have permanent leakage.
- Pain medication consumption [ Time Frame: Day 1 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Pain medication consumption [ Time Frame: 1 month ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Pain medication consumption [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Pain medication consumption [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Pain medication consumption [ Time Frame: 9 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Pain medication consumption [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Pain medication consumption [ Time Frame: 15 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Pain medication consumption [ Time Frame: 18 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Pain medication consumption [ Time Frame: 21 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Number of colostomy leaks per day [ Time Frame: Day 1 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Number of colostomy leaks per day [ Time Frame: 1 month ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Number of colostomy leaks per day [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Number of colostomy leaks per day [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Number of colostomy leaks per day [ Time Frame: 9 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Number of colostomy leaks per day [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Number of colostomy leaks per day [ Time Frame: 18 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Number of colostomy leaks per day [ Time Frame: 15 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Number of colostomy leaks per day [ Time Frame: 21 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Number of colostomy sac changes per day [ Time Frame: Day 1 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Number of colostomy sac changes per day [ Time Frame: 1 month ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Number of colostomy sac changes per day [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Number of colostomy sac changes per day [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Number of colostomy sac changes per day [ Time Frame: 9 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Number of colostomy sac changes per day [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Number of colostomy sac changes per day [ Time Frame: 15 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Number of colostomy sac changes per day [ Time Frame: 18 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Number of colostomy sac changes per day [ Time Frame: 21 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Does the patient consider fitting a sac to his/her colostomy to be a difficult task? yes/no [ Time Frame: Day 1 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Does the patient consider fitting a sac to his/her colostomy to be a difficult task? yes/no [ Time Frame: 1 month ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Does the patient consider fitting a sac to his/her colostomy to be a difficult task? yes/no [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Does the patient consider fitting a sac to his/her colostomy to be a difficult task? yes/no [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Does the patient consider fitting a sac to his/her colostomy to be a difficult task? yes/no [ Time Frame: 9 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Does the patient consider fitting a sac to his/her colostomy to be a difficult task? yes/no [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Does the patient consider fitting a sac to his/her colostomy to be a difficult task? yes/no [ Time Frame: 15 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Does the patient consider fitting a sac to his/her colostomy to be a difficult task? yes/no [ Time Frame: 18 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Does the patient consider fitting a sac to his/her colostomy to be a difficult task? yes/no [ Time Frame: 21 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Exposition of the prothesis (mesh): yes/no [ Time Frame: 1 month ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Exposition of the prothesis (mesh): yes/no [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Exposition of the prothesis (mesh): yes/no [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Exposition of the prothesis (mesh): yes/no [ Time Frame: 9 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Exposition of the prothesis (mesh): yes/no [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Exposition of the prothesis (mesh): yes/no [ Time Frame: 15 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Exposition of the prothesis (mesh): yes/no [ Time Frame: 18 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Exposition of the prothesis (mesh): yes/no [ Time Frame: 21 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Presence/absence of a complication potentially linked to the presence of a mesh? [ Time Frame: 1 month ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Presence/absence of a complication potentially linked to the presence of a mesh? [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Presence/absence of a complication potentially linked to the presence of a mesh? [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Presence/absence of a complication potentially linked to the presence of a mesh? [ Time Frame: 9 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Presence/absence of a complication potentially linked to the presence of a mesh? [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Presence/absence of a complication potentially linked to the presence of a mesh? [ Time Frame: 15 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Presence/absence of a complication potentially linked to the presence of a mesh? [ Time Frame: 18 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Presence/absence of a complication potentially linked to the presence of a mesh? [ Time Frame: 21 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Presence/absence of a complication potentially linked to the presence of a mesh? [ Time Frame: 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Ablation of the mesh: yes/no [ Time Frame: 1 month ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Ablation of the mesh: yes/no [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Ablation of the mesh: yes/no [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Ablation of the mesh: yes/no [ Time Frame: 9 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Ablation of the mesh: yes/no [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Ablation of the mesh: yes/no [ Time Frame: 15 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Ablation of the mesh: yes/no [ Time Frame: 18 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Ablation of the mesh: yes/no [ Time Frame: 21 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Ablation of the mesh: yes/no [ Time Frame: 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Evaluation of colostomy healing by the clinician [ Time Frame: Day 1 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]The evaluating clinician (blind to the procedure) will evaluate the healing progress of the colostomy using a visual analog scale.
- Evaluation of colostomy healing by the clinician [ Time Frame: 1 month ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]The evaluating clinician (blind to the procedure) will evaluate the healing progress of the colostomy using a visual analog scale.
- Evaluation of colostomy healing by the clinician [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]The evaluating clinician (blind to the procedure) will evaluate the healing progress of the colostomy using a visual analog scale.
- Evaluation of colostomy healing by the clinician [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]The evaluating clinician (blind to the procedure) will evaluate the healing progress of the colostomy using a visual analog scale.
- Evaluation of colostomy healing by the clinician [ Time Frame: 9 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]The evaluating clinician (blind to the procedure) will evaluate the healing progress of the colostomy using a visual analog scale.
- Evaluation of colostomy healing by the clinician [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]The evaluating clinician (blind to the procedure) will evaluate the healing progress of the colostomy using a visual analog scale.
- Evaluation of colostomy healing by the clinician [ Time Frame: 15 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]The evaluating clinician (blind to the procedure) will evaluate the healing progress of the colostomy using a visual analog scale.
- Evaluation of colostomy healing by the clinician [ Time Frame: 18 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]The evaluating clinician (blind to the procedure) will evaluate the healing progress of the colostomy using a visual analog scale.
- Evaluation of colostomy healing by the clinician [ Time Frame: 21 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]The evaluating clinician (blind to the procedure) will evaluate the healing progress of the colostomy using a visual analog scale.
- Evaluation of colostomy healing by the clinician [ Time Frame: 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]The evaluating clinician (blind to the procedure) will evaluate the healing progress of the colostomy using a visual analog scale.
- Duration of postoperative fever (hours) [ Time Frame: 10 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Presence/absence of postoperative fever > 37.2°C [ Time Frame: Day 1 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
| Estimated Enrollment: | 200 |
| Study Start Date: | November 2012 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | November 2015 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | November 2015 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Mesh
The patients allocated to this arm of the study will have mesh (Covidien France: mono filament polyester bidimensional knit) implanted in association with their colostomy.
|
Procedure: Colostomy with mesh implantation
Colostomy with mesh implantation
|
|
Active Comparator: No mesh
The patients allocated to this arm of the protocol will not receive mesh implantation with their colostomy.
|
Procedure: Simple colostomy
Colostomy with no mesh implantation.
|
Detailed Description:
Previous studies indicate that implanting mesh for peristomal hernia repair may efficiently prevent hernia relapse. However, mesh provides a good infection site, which is not a desirable characteristic for a material adjacent to a colostomy "port". Our goal is to implement a high-quality, randomized trial to demonstrate whether or not systematic mesh implantation upon primary hernia creation is an effective means of avoiding this common and troublesome complication.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- The patient has given informed consent
- The patient must be affiliated with a health insurance programme
- The patient must be available for 24 months of follow-up
- The patient requires a colostomy (primo-event, ie first colostomies only)
Exclusion Criteria:
- The patient is currently participating in another interventional study
- The patient is in an exclusion period determined by a previous study
- The patient is under guardianship
- The patient refuses to sign the consent
- It is impossible to communicate information to the patient (does not read French)
- The patient is pregnant
- The patient is breastfeeding
- There is a contra-indication for any treatment used in this study
- The subject has already had a colostomy
- The subject has peritonitis
- The subject needs a colostomy for infectious reasons
Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01380860
Contacts
| Contact: Michel Prudhomme, MD PhD | +33.(0)4.66.68.31.43 | michel.prudhomme@chu-nimes.fr |
| Contact: Carey M Suehs, PhD | +33.(0)4.66.68.67.15 | carey.suehs@chu-nimes.fr |
Locations
| France | |
| CHRU de Besancon | Recruiting |
| Besancon, France, 25030 | |
| Sub-Investigator: Georges Mantion, MD PhD | |
| CHU de Bordeaux | Recruiting |
| Bordeaux, France, 33075 | |
| Sub-Investigator: Eric Rullier, MD PhD | |
| Sub-Investigator: Christophe Laurent, MD PhD | |
| CHRU de Clermont Ferrand | Not yet recruiting |
| Clermont Ferrand, France, 63058 | |
| Sub-Investigator: Denis Pezet, MD PhD | |
| Sub-Investigator: Emmanuel Buc, MD | |
| Sub-Investigator: Renaud Flamein, MD | |
| APHP - Hôpital Beaujon | Not yet recruiting |
| Clichy, France, 92110 | |
| Sub-Investigator: Yves Panis, MD, PhD | |
| Hôpital Albert Michallon, CHU de Grenoble | Not yet recruiting |
| Grenoble, France, 38043 | |
| Sub-Investigator: Jean-Luc Faucheron, MD PhD | |
| APHP - Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bicêtre | Not yet recruiting |
| Le Kremlin Bicêtre Cedex, France, 94275 | |
| Sub-Investigator: Stéphane Benoist, MD, PhD | |
| CHU de Lyon | Recruiting |
| Lyon, France, 69317 | |
| Sub-Investigator: Eddy Cotte, MD | |
| Centre Régional de Lutte Contre le Cancer - Institut Paoli-Calmettes | Not yet recruiting |
| Marseille, France, 13009 | |
| Sub-Investigator: Bernard Lelong, MD | |
| APHM - Hôpital La Timone Adultes | Recruiting |
| Marseille, France, 13385 | |
| Centre Régional de Lutte Contre le Cancer Val d'Aurelle - Paul Lamarque | Not yet recruiting |
| Montpellier, France, 34298 | |
| Sub-Investigator: Philippe Rouanet, MD PhD | |
| CHU de Nantes | Recruiting |
| Nantes, France, 44093 | |
| Sub-Investigator: Guillaume Meurette, MD | |
| Sub-Investigator: Paul Antoine Lehur, MD PhD | |
| Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes | Recruiting |
| Nîmes, France, 30029 | |
| Principal Investigator: Michel Prudhomme, MD PhD | |
| Sub-Investigator: Sylvain Laporte, MD | |
| Sub-Investigator: Marie Christine Lemoine, MD | |
| APHP - Hôpital Lariboisière | Not yet recruiting |
| Paris, France, 75010 | |
| APHP - Hôpital Saint-Antoine | Not yet recruiting |
| Paris Cedex 12, France, 75571 | |
| Sub-Investigator: Yann Parc, MD, PhD | |
| APHP - Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpetrière | Not yet recruiting |
| Paris Cedex 13, France, 75651 | |
| Sub-Investigator: Medhi Karoui, MD, PhD | |
| Hôpital Pontchailou | Recruiting |
| Rennes, France, 35033 | |
| Sub-Investigator: Bernard Meunier, MD PhD | |
| CHU de Rouen | Recruiting |
| Rouen, France, 76038 | |
| Sub-Investigator: Francis Michot, MD PhD | |
| Sub-Investigator: Jean Jacques Tuech, MD | |
| Centre Régional de Lutte contre le Cancer Centre Paul Strauss | Not yet recruiting |
| Strasbourg, France, 67065 | |
| Sub-Investigator: Jean-Claude Ollier, MD PhD | |
| CHU de Toulouse | Recruiting |
| Toulouse, France | |
| Sub-Investigator: Guillaume Portier, MD PhD | |
| CH de Vichy - Jacques Larin | Recruiting |
| Vichy, France, 03207 | |
| Sub-Investigator: Anne Dubois, MD | |
Sponsors and Collaborators
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
Investigators
| Principal Investigator: | Michel Prudhomme, MD, PhD | Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01380860 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | PHRC-N/2011/MP-01, 2011-A01572-39 |
| Study First Received: | June 22, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | March 26, 2013 |
| Health Authority: | France: Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des produits de santé France: Committee for the Protection of Personnes |
Keywords provided by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes:
|
mesh hernia |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Hernia Pathological Conditions, Anatomical |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on June 17, 2013