Restricted vs. Free Knee Range Of Motion For Primary Traumatic Patellar Dislocation

The recruitment status of this study is unknown because the information has not been verified recently.
Verified January 2005 by Tampere University Hospital.
Recruitment status was  Active, not recruiting
Sponsor:
Information provided by:
Tampere University Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01344915
First received: April 28, 2011
Last updated: April 29, 2011
Last verified: January 2005
  Purpose

Knee immobilization in near extension has been proposed as a nonoperative treatment for primary traumatic patellar dislocation, although there exist no prospective studies regarding the method of immobilization. The objective of this prospective randomized study was to compare the clinical outcome after nonoperative treatment with restricted vs. free range of motion (ROM) for primary traumatic patellar dislocation.


Condition Intervention
Patellar Dislocation
Procedure: Locked knee brace

Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: RESTRICTED VS. FREE KNEE RANGE OF MOTION FOR PRIMARY TRAUMATIC PATELLAR DISLOCATION: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY

Resource links provided by NLM:


Further study details as provided by Tampere University Hospital:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • Patellar redislocation
    The number of patients with patellar redislocation after initial treatment.


Study Start Date: December 2005
Estimated Study Completion Date: June 2011
Primary Completion Date: January 2007 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Arms Assigned Interventions
Active Comparator: Knee brace Procedure: Locked knee brace
Active Comparator: Locked knee brace Procedure: Locked knee brace

  Eligibility

Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years to 50 Years
Genders Eligible for Study:   Both
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • A primary (first-time) patellar dislocation verified by clinical examination
  • Signs of patellar dislocation in MRI

Exclusion Criteria:

  • anyone with previous patellar instability
  • osteochondral fracture requiring surgery
  • associated knee injuries
  Contacts and Locations
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the Contacts provided below. For general information, see Learn About Clinical Studies.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01344915

Locations
Finland
Tampere University Hospital
Tampere, Finland, 33521
Sponsors and Collaborators
Tampere University Hospital
Investigators
Principal Investigator: Petri J Sillanpää, MD PhD Tampere University Hospital, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
  More Information

No publications provided

Responsible Party: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tampere University Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01344915     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: PATRCTFIN
Study First Received: April 28, 2011
Last Updated: April 29, 2011
Health Authority: Finland:Valvira Health Administration

Keywords provided by Tampere University Hospital:
Patella
Knee
Brace

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Dislocations
Patellar Dislocation
Wounds and Injuries
Knee Injuries
Leg Injuries

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on September 22, 2014