A Study of Regadenoson in Subjects Undergoing Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI) Using Multidetector Computed Tomography (MDCT) Compared to Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT)
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Astellas Pharma Inc
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Astellas Pharma Inc
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01334918
First received: April 12, 2011
Last updated: July 12, 2012
Last verified: July 2012
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to compare Multidetector Computed Tomography (MDCT) and Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) with regadenoson in order to detect the presence or absence of reversible defects.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) |
Drug: regadenoson Radiation: technetium Radiation: Contrast |
Phase 2 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Diagnostic |
| Official Title: | A Phase 2, Open-Label, Randomized, Cross-Over Study of Regadenoson in Subjects Undergoing Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging by Multidetector Computed Tomography (MDCT) and Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) |
Resource links provided by NLM:
Further study details as provided by Astellas Pharma Inc:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- Number of reversible defects categorized into absence or presence of ischemia (0-1 versus ≥ 2) as assessed by the central imaging lab for single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) [ Time Frame: up to Day 2 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Secondary Outcome Measures:
- Overall image quality (rated as excellent, good, fair or poor) as assessed by independent readers on the scans [ Time Frame: Day 1-2 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Presence or absence of reversible defects (0-1 versus ≥ 2) in the left anterior descending coronary artery noted on the SPECT and CT scans [ Time Frame: Day 1-2 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Presence or absence of reversible defects (0-1 versus ≥ 2) in the right coronary artery noted on the CT and SPECT scans [ Time Frame: Day 1-2 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Presence or absence of reversible defects (0-1 versus ≥ 2) in the left circumflex coronary artery noted on the CT and SPECT scans [ Time Frame: Day 1-2 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) with CT as compared to SPECT for fixed defects [ Time Frame: Day 1-2 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Percentage of subjects who have two or more ischemic segments on SPECT, but less on CT (false negative CT) [ Time Frame: Day 1-2 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Enrollment: | 124 |
| Study Start Date: | April 2011 |
| Study Completion Date: | June 2012 |
| Primary Completion Date: | June 2012 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
| Experimental: Multidetector Computed Tomography (MDCT) |
Drug: regadenoson
intravenous (IV)
Other Names:
Radiation: technetium
intravenous (IV)
Other Names:
Radiation: Contrast
intravenous (IV)
|
| Experimental: Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) |
Drug: regadenoson
intravenous (IV)
Other Names:
Radiation: technetium
intravenous (IV)
Other Names:
Radiation: Contrast
intravenous (IV)
|
Detailed Description:
All subjects will be randomized to one of two imaging sequences: rest/stress SPECT on Day 1 followed by stress/rest MDCT on Day 2 or stress/rest MDCT on Day 1 followed by rest/stress SPECT on Day 2. All stress scans will involve the injection of regadenoson as the pharmacologic stress agent.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 45 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male subjects must be ≥ 45 years of age
- Female subjects must be ≥ 50 years of age
Subject has met at least one of the following three criteria:
- has a suspected (clinical impression) or known diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) with typical angina that has been referred from nuclear cardiology lab schedule or cardiac computed tomography (CT) schedule
- has stable symptoms with possible elective catheterization procedure scheduled and where further imaging may be beneficial;
- has known CAD from a previous invasive coronary angiography (ICA) performed more than 12 weeks prior to screening who now present with new cardiac symptoms
- Subject has been referred for a clinically indicated myocardial perfusion imaging procedure or Cardiac CT procedure for suspected moderate or high risk CAD
- Subject must abstain from eating and drinking 30 minutes prior and 30 minutes post study drug administration
- Subject must abstain from smoking 3 hours prior and 8 hours post study drug administration
- Subject must abstain from any intake of methylxanthine-containing foods and beverages within 12 hours prior to Day 1 visit through the Day 3 Follow-Up Visit, as these foods may alter regadenoson effects. Subject is able to safely abstain from theophylline use for 12 hours prior to study drug administration
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subject is concurrently participating in another drug study or has received an investigational drug within 30 days prior to Screening
- Subject has a history of a clinically significant illness (other than CAD), medical condition, or laboratory abnormality, which would preclude participation in the study
- Subject has renal dysfunction demonstrated by a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 45 mL/min (calculated using Cockroft-Gault formula Note: Subjects with a GFR 45-60 mL/min will undergo a hydration procedure
- Female subject who is pregnant, lactating or of childbearing potential that refuses to use a medically acceptable form of contraception until the Telephone Follow up Visit is complete
- Female subject has a positive pregnancy test prior to randomization.
- Subject has a history of second or third degree heart block or sinus node dysfunction unless the subject has a functioning pacemaker
- Subject has symptomatic hypotension (temporary and reversible conditions that no longer exist are allowed)
- Subject is allergic or intolerant to aminophylline, nitroglycerin or metoprolol
- Subject is allergic or intolerant to regadenoson or any of its excipients
- Subject is unable or unwilling to comply with the procedure schedule
- Subject has previously enrolled in this study or was enrolled in another regadenoson study sponsored by Astellas
- Subject has atrial fibrillation or significant arrhythmias which may result in decreased image quality for the imaging studies (CT and SPECT)
- Subject has high heart rate (> 65 bpm) and contra-indications to administer beta-blockers (severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma, second and third degree AV block)
Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01334918
Locations
| United States, California | |
| Sutter Roseville Medical Center | |
| Roseville, California, United States, 95661 | |
| Harbor UCLA Medical Center | |
| Torrance, California, United States, 90502 | |
| United States, Florida | |
| Cardiovascular Research Center of South Florida | |
| Miami, Florida, United States, 33173 | |
| Baptist Hospital of Miami | |
| Miami, Florida, United States, 33176 | |
| United States, Kansas | |
| Midwest Cardiology Associates, P.C. | |
| Overland Park, Kansas, United States, 66029 | |
| United States, Maine | |
| Maine Research Associates | |
| Auburn, Maine, United States, 04210 | |
| United States, Massachusetts | |
| Brigham and Women's Hospital | |
| Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115 | |
| Massachusetts General Hospital | |
| Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114 | |
| Berkshire Medical Center | |
| Pittsfield, Massachusetts, United States, 01201 | |
| United States, Michigan | |
| Henry Ford Health System | |
| Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48202 | |
| United States, Oregon | |
| Oregon Health and Science University | |
| Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239 | |
Sponsors and Collaborators
Astellas Pharma Inc
Investigators
| Study Director: | Senior Medical Director | Astellas Pharma Global Development |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Astellas Pharma Inc |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01334918 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 3606-CL-2001 |
| Study First Received: | April 12, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | July 12, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration |
Keywords provided by Astellas Pharma Inc:
|
Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) ischemia pharmacologic stress regadenoson |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Coronary Artery Disease Myocardial Ischemia Coronary Disease Heart Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases Arteriosclerosis Arterial Occlusive Diseases Vascular Diseases Regadenoson |
Adenosine A2 Receptor Antagonists Purinergic P1 Receptor Antagonists Purinergic Antagonists Purinergic Agents Neurotransmitter Agents Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Pharmacologic Actions Physiological Effects of Drugs |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 23, 2013