Treadmill, Stretching and Proprioceptive Exercise (TreSPE) Rehabilitation Program for Charcot−Marie−Tooth Neuropathy Type 1A (CMT1A)
Recruitment status was Not yet recruiting
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Charcot−Marie−Tooth neuropathy type 1A (CMT1A) is one of the most common inherited neurological disorders. The study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of an innovative rehabilitation protocol constituted by exercises at the treadmill and by a stretching and proprioceptive approach. A total of 92 patients will be enrolled in the study and treated in a controlled, randomized, single blind, way. To recruit a high number of patients with CMT1A the study will be multicentric and will comprehend four of the most active clinical centers in the field of CMT, in Italy. People with CMT1A are very motivated in entering rehabilitation protocols because to date there is no effective therapy for this disease. Therefore, the investigators expect a high compliance by the patients. With the present project the investigators plan to clarify several unanswered questions: 1) the efficacy and safety of treadmill over a more conventional protocol; 2) the duration and frequency of any rehabilitation treatment; 3) the most sensitive outcome measures to evaluate the efficacy of rehabilitation approach in patients with CMT.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease Type 1A |
Other: TreSPE Other: SPE |
Phase 2 Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Effects on Charcot−Marie−Tooth Neuropathy Type 1A of a Composite Treadmill, Stretching and Proprioceptive Exercise (TreSPE) Rehabilitation Program. |
- Walking ability of patients will be evaluated as the time needed to walk for 10 meters at normal speed for the patients [ Time Frame: Baseline: 1 day before the rehabilitative protocol starts (T1) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The walking ability of patients will be evaluated through the "10 meters timed walk test" which will be performed at baseline (T1 or day-1), at the end of the three months of treatment (T2 or day90) and at the end of the three months of follow up (T3 or day180).
- Walking ability of patients will be evaluated after finishing the treatment as the time needed to walk for 10 meters at normal speed for the patients [ Time Frame: at the end of treatment: day 90 (T2) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The walking ability of patients will be evaluated through the "10 meters timed walk test" which will be performed at baseline (T1 or day-1), at the end of the three months of treatment (T2 or day90) and at the end of the three months of follow up (T3 or day180).
- Walking ability of patients will be evaluated after finishing the treatment as the time needed to walk for 10 meters at normal speed for the patients [ Time Frame: at the end of follow up: day 180 (T3) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The walking ability of patients will be evaluated through the "10 meters timed walk test" which will be performed at baseline (T1 or day-1), at the end of the three months of treatment (T2 or day90) and at the end of the three months of follow up (T3 or day180).
- Balance will be evaluated through the Berg Scale [ Time Frame: Baseline: 1 day before the rehabilitative protocol starts ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The Berg scale is a tool to evaluate balance and ranges from 0 to 36 points being 36 normal
- Balance will be evaluated through the Berg Scale [ Time Frame: at the end of treatment: day 90 (T2) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The Berg scale is a tool to evaluate balance and ranges from 0 to 36 points being 36 normal
- balance will be evaluted through the Berg scale [ Time Frame: at the end of follow up: day 180 (T3) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The Berg scale is a tool to evaluate balance and ranges from 0 to 36 points being 36 normal
- Quality of life will be evaluated through the SF - 36 questionnaire [ Time Frame: Baseline: 1 day before the rehabilitative protocol starts (T1) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The SF-36 is a multi-purpose, short-form health survey with only 36 questions. It yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being scores as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures and a preference-based health utility index.
- Quality of life will be evaluated through the SF - 36 questionnaire [ Time Frame: at the end of treatment: day 90 (T2) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The SF-36 is a multi-purpose, short-form health survey with only 36 questions. It yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being scores as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures and a preference-based health utility index.
- Quality of life will be evaluated through the SF - 36 questionnaire [ Time Frame: at the end of follow up: day 180 (T3) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The SF-36 is a multi-purpose, short-form health survey with only 36 questions. It yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being scores as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures and a preference-based health utility index.
| Estimated Enrollment: | 92 |
| Study Start Date: | February 2011 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | January 2012 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | October 2011 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: TreSPE
Treatment with treadmill, proprioceptive and stretching exercises
|
Other: TreSPE
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: SPE
Proprioceptive and stretching exercises
|
Other: TreSPE
Other Names:
Other: SPE
Other Name: SPE
|
Detailed Description:
A multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled, single blind study to evaluate the impact of aerobic exercise, based on a tightly controlled program at the treadmill, on the rehabilitation therapy of CMT 1A neuropathy.
Comparing aerobic training at the treadmill combined with respiratory physiotherapy, stretching and proprioceptive exercises (TreSPE- treated group) with a more conventional treatment only composed by respiratory physiotherapy, stretching and proprioceptive exercises (SPE- control group) will provide information on the impact of Treadmill in CMT1A.
92 patients (23 per centre) will be enrolled and randomly assigned to TreSPE (n = 46) or to SPE (n = 46). Both groups will be treated for three months and followed up for six months.
No serious side effects are expected with TreSPE, as also suggested by our preliminary results. For safety reasons blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR) and an electrocardiogram will be recorded during the rehabilitation treatment when the treating physician considers it necessary. The patients will be allowed, if needed, to hold at the parallel bars of the treadmill during exercise. According to the American Thoracic Society (ATS) guidelines the cardiopulmonary exercise test will be interrupted if BP raises at 240/120 and/or HR to 220−patients age.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 70 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Clinical diagnosis of CMT1A
- Genetic confirmation (17p112 chromosome duplication)
- Age 18 - 70 years old
- Ability to accomplish the primary outcome measure (10 meter walking test) without support, with or without ankle foot orthoses (AFO)
- Ability to walk on a treadmill on a horizontal plane for 20 minutes at a speed of 1.5 km/h with or without support at the bars
- Score at the Mobility Scale between 2 and 11
- Signed written informed consent to participate
Exclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of Hereditary Neuropathy with Liability to Pressure Palsies (HNPP) or any other type of CMT
- Other associated causes of neuropathy
- Vestibular affections, psychiatric, cardiovascular and lung disorders or severe arthropathic changes in the lower limbs
- Non ambulating patients or patients always requiring even monolateral support to walk
- Other neurological disorders
Contacts and Locations| Contact: Margherita A Monti Bragadin, MD | 0039-010-3537040 | margherita.montibragadin@gmail.com |
| Italy | |
| University of Genoa | Not yet recruiting |
| Genoa, Italy, 16132 | |
| Contact: Angelo Schenone, Professor +39 010 353 7040 aschenone@neurologia.unige.it | |
| I.R.C.C.S. Foundation, Besta Institute | Not yet recruiting |
| Milan, Italy, 20133 | |
| Contact: Davide Pareyson, MD +39 02 23943001 dpareyson@istituto-besta.it | |
| Don Carlo Gnocchi Foundation | Not yet recruiting |
| Rome, Italy, 00194 | |
| Contact: Luca Padua, MD +39 06 33086231 lpadua@rm.unicatt.it | |
| Departement of Neurological and Visual Sciences, University of Verona | Not yet recruiting |
| Verona, Italy, 37134 | |
| Contact: Gian Maria Fabrizi, MD +39 045 8124461 gianmaria.fabrizi@univr.it | |
| Principal Investigator: | Angelo E Schenone, MD | University of Genova |
More Information
Additional Information:
Publications:
| Responsible Party: | Gianluigi Mancardi, Neuroscience, Ophtalmology and Genetic Departement |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01289704 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | GUP09013 |
| Study First Received: | January 24, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | February 3, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | Italy: Ethics Committee |
Keywords provided by University of Genova:
|
Charcot−Marie−Tooth disease, CMT1A, rehabilitation, treadmill, |
stretching, proprioception, Randomised Controlled Trial. |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Hereditary Sensory and Motor Neuropathy Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease Nerve Compression Syndromes Tooth Diseases Nervous System Malformations Nervous System Diseases Heredodegenerative Disorders, Nervous System |
Neurodegenerative Diseases Polyneuropathies Peripheral Nervous System Diseases Neuromuscular Diseases Congenital Abnormalities Genetic Diseases, Inborn Stomatognathic Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on June 17, 2013