Does the Recall by the General Practitioner Improve Patients' Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening? (Pagedocc2)
Recruitment status was Recruiting
The propose of this study is to assess the effect of general practitioner's involvement in the stimulus invitation letter in colorectal cancer screening compared to sending the patient home test (stimulus 2 of reference as contained in the specifications).
|Study Design:||Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Screening
|Official Title:||Does the Invitation by the General Practitioner Improve Patients' Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening? A Cluster Randomised Controlled Study.|
- Completion of Fecal Occult Blod Test [ Time Frame: 7 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Increased number of patients who completed the test for faecal occult blood following the first solicitation with the letter co-signed by general practitioner, compared with the conventional solicition(including replies exclusions).
- Delays from receipt of the letter and the completion of the test. [ Time Frame: 7 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Proportion of uninterpretable test. [ Time Frame: 7 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
|Study Start Date:||September 2010|
|Estimated Study Completion Date:||April 2011|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date:||April 2011 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)|
No Intervention: Control
Patients receive by mail the materials needed for stool samples.
No intervention (Patients receive by mail the materials needed for stool samples).
|Experimental: Co-signed Letter||
Other: Co-signed Letter
Patients receive a personalized stimulus letter co-signed by their general practitioner and the medical coordinator of ADECA.
|Contact: Serge Gilberg||01 44 41 23 firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Université Paris Descartes||Recruiting|
|Paris, Ile de France, France, 75014|
|Contact: Barthe 01 44 41 23 63 email@example.com|