A Trial of Somatostatin With Endoscopic Variceal Ligation (EVL) in Control of Acute Variceal Bleeding (AVB-EVL+S)
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Background: Efficacy of endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy in achieving initial control of acute variceal bleeding and five-day haemostasis has been shown to significantly improve when vasoactive drug is added. However, there is limited data whether addition of somatostatin, to endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) improves the efficacy of EVL.
Aim: To compare EVL plus somatostatin versus EVL plus placebo in control of acute variceal bleeding.
Patients and methods: Consecutive cirrhotic patients with acute variceal bleeding from esophageal varices were enrolled in the trial. After emergency EVL, patients were randomized to receive either somatostatin (250 mcg/hr) or placebo infusion. Primary endpoint was treatment failure within 5 days. Treatment failure was defined as fresh hematemesis ≥2 hour after start of therapy or death.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Acute Bleeding Esophageal Varices Portal Hypertension Cirrhosis |
Drug: Somatostatin Drug: Placebo |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Double Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Somatostatin in Association With Endoscopic Variceal Ligation (EVL) in Control of Acute Variceal Bleeding |
- Treatment failure [ Time Frame: 5 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The primary endpoint was treatment failure, defined as the occurrence of any of the following within a period of 120 h (5 days) from the time of admission: (i) Fresh hematemesis ≥2 hr after EVL; or (ii) Death within 5 days.
- In-hospital mortality [ Time Frame: During the same admission ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Death during the same admission to the hospital
- Transfusion requirement [ Time Frame: During hospital stay ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Amount of packed cell or FFP infusions received during the hospital stay
- ICU stay in days [ Time Frame: During the hospital stay ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Number of dys the patient spent in ICU
- Drug-related adverse effects [ Time Frame: 5 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Adverse effects due to somatostatin or placebo infusion
| Enrollment: | 61 |
| Study Start Date: | November 2005 |
| Study Completion Date: | November 2009 |
| Primary Completion Date: | November 2009 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: EVL plus Somatostatin
Emergency EVL plus Somatostatin (250 mcg/hr) infusion for 5 days
|
Drug: Somatostatin
Emergency EVL plus Somatostatin (250 mcg/hr) infusion for 5 days
Other Names:
|
|
Placebo Comparator: EVL plus Placebo
Emergency EVL plus placebo infusion for 5 days
|
Drug: Placebo
Emergency EVL plus placebo infusion for 5 days
Other Name: Placebo
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 12 Years to 75 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Clinical diagnosis of portal hypertension
- Having hematemesis and/or melena within 24 hour prior to admission
- Source of bleeding should be esophageal varices
Exclusion Criteria:
- Non-cirrhotic cause of portal hypertension
- Age <12 or >75 years
- Hepatic encephalopathy grade 3 or 4
- Renal failure with serum creatinine >2 mg/dL
- Any evidence of bleeding from additional source apart from esophageal varices (like gastric varices, portal hypertensive gastropathy, erosions or ulcers including variceal ulcers)
- Patients already on vasoactive drugs like somatostatin or terlipressin during the current episode of bleeding
- Patients already received EVL or EST elsewhere during the current episode of bleeding prior to presenting to our hospital
- Patients with history of surgery for portal hypertension or TIPS
- Concomitant severe cardio-pulmonary disease
- Concomitant malignancy
- HVPG not possible within 24 hrs of presentation
- Patients refusing to participate in the study.
Contacts and Locations| India | |
| Department of Gastroenterology, G B Pant Hospital | |
| New Delhi, Delhi, India, 110 002 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Shiv K Sarin, MD, DM | G B Pant Hospital |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Dr S K Sarin, Department of Gastroenterology, G B Pant Hospital, New Delhi, India |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01267669 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 2005-PHT-01 |
| Study First Received: | December 27, 2010 |
| Last Updated: | December 27, 2010 |
| Health Authority: | India: Ministry of Health |
Keywords provided by Govind Ballabh Pant Hospital:
|
Variceal bleeding Endoscopic therapy Band ligation |
Somatostatin Vasoactive drugs Octreotide |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Esophageal Diseases Esophageal and Gastric Varices Hemorrhage Hypertension Hypertension, Portal Liver Cirrhosis Fibrosis Varicose Veins Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage Gastrointestinal Diseases |
Digestive System Diseases Liver Diseases Pathologic Processes Vascular Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases Somatostatin Hormones Hormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone Antagonists Physiological Effects of Drugs Pharmacologic Actions |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 21, 2013