Enhancing Juvenile Drug Court Outcomes With Evidence-Based Practices
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Juvenile drug courts were developed in response to a perceived need to intervene more effectively with youth with substance abuse problems. Close collaboration between the court and substance abuse treatment provider is a defining component of the drug court model and is critical to helping youth achieve positive outcomes. Despite the proliferation of juvenile drug courts in recent years, however, evaluation of their capacity to reduce offender substance use and criminal activity has lagged. Moreover, the Institute of Medicine (IOM, 1998) and leading experts (McLellan, Carise, & Kleber, 2003) have presented a bleak picture of the nation's capacity to meet the treatment needs of substance abusing individuals. Although community-based programs provide the backbone of substance abuse treatment in the nation, their capabilities have not kept up with major scientific advances in the development and validation of evidence-based substance abuse interventions.
Building on our research findings and experience regarding juvenile drug court outcomes as well as the transport of evidence-based practices to community treatment settings, the purpose of this study is to develop and test a relatively flexible and low cost strategy for enhancing the outcomes of juvenile drug courts by integrating components of evidence-based treatments into existing substance abuse services.
Specifically, this project aims to:
Aim 1: Adapt existing intervention and training protocols from evidence-based practices (i.e., Contingency Management for adolescent substance abuse; family engagement strategies from evidence-based treatments of juvenile offenders) for integration into juvenile drug court sites.
Aim 2: Conduct a study to examine youth (e.g., substance use and criminal behavior) and system level (e.g., intervention adherence, feasibility, retention and completion rates, consumer satisfaction, cost estimates) effects of implementing the intervention protocols in juvenile drug courts.
Aim 3: Revise the intervention and training protocols in preparation for a Stage II study if findings are supportive.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Adolescent Substance Use |
Behavioral: Contingency Management-Family Engagement (CM-FAM) Other: Usual Services (US) |
Phase 2 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Enhancing Juvenile Drug Court Outcomes With Evidence-Based Practices |
- Substance Use [ Time Frame: Quarterly for up to 1 year post-baseline ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Delinquency [ Time Frame: Quarterly for up to 1 year post-baseline ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Intervention Fidelity [ Time Frame: Monthly for up to 1 year post-baseline ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Cost Estimates [ Time Frame: Annually for 4 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Consumer Satisfaction [ Time Frame: Bi-annually for 4 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Enrollment: | 172 |
| Study Start Date: | September 2007 |
| Study Completion Date: | March 2012 |
| Primary Completion Date: | March 2012 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
| Experimental: CM-FAM |
Behavioral: Contingency Management-Family Engagement (CM-FAM)
Evidence-based outpatient intervention for adolescent substance use
|
| Active Comparator: US |
Other: Usual Services (US)
Typical community-based substance abuse treatment services
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 12 Years to 17 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Juvenile Drug Court-involved youth
- Fluency in English
Exclusion Criteria:
- None
Contacts and Locations| United States, South Carolina | |
| Medical University of South Carolina | |
| Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Scott W Henggeler, Ph.D. | Medical University of South Carolina |
More Information
Additional Information:
Publications:
| Responsible Party: | Medical University of South Carolina |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01266109 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 019892, R01DA019892 |
| Study First Received: | November 18, 2010 |
| Last Updated: | June 17, 2013 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |
Keywords provided by Medical University of South Carolina:
|
Substance Use Delinquency Juvenile Drug Court Contingency Management Family Engagement |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on June 18, 2013