Early Tracheostomy in Ventilated Stroke Patients (SETPOINT)
Recruitment status was Recruiting
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Patients with severe ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes, who require mechanical ventilation, have a particularly bad prognosis. If they require long-term ventilation, their orotracheal tube needs to be, like in any other intensive care patient, replaced by a shorter tracheal tube below the larynx. This so called tracheostomy might be associated with advantages such as less demand of narcotics and pain killers, less lesions in mouth and larynx, better mouth hygiene, safer airway, more patient comfort and earlier mobilisation. The best timepoint for tracheostomy in stroke, however, is not known. This study investigates the potential benefits of early tracheostomy in ventilated critically ill patients with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Ischemic Stroke Intracerebral Hemorrhage Subarachnoid Hemorrhage |
Procedure: Early Tracheostomy Procedure: Late Tracheostomy |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Stroke-Related Early Tracheostomy vs. Prolonged Orotracheal Intubation in Neurocritical Care Trial |
- Intensive Care Unit Length of Stay (ICU-LOS) [ Time Frame: open ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The primary endpoint is assessed as days from admission to until discharge from the intensive care unit.
- Time of ICU-dependence [ Time Frame: open ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]This secondary endpoint is assessed as days from admission to a pre-defined status that would allow discharge from ICU (absence of active infection, vasopressors, pulmonary and cardial instability etc.)
- Functional Outcome [ Time Frame: admission, discharge, at 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]This secondary endpoint is assessed as the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at the above named timepoints.
- Mortality [ Time Frame: during stay, after 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]This secondary endpoint is assessed as time and type of death during the ICU-stay and 6 months after admission.
- Hospital Length of Stay [ Time Frame: open ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]This secondary endpoint is assessed as days spent at the recruiting hospital from admission to discharge.
- Duration of Ventilation [ Time Frame: open ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]This secondary endpoint is assessed as half-days on the ventilator until the patient is ventilator-independent for 24 h.
- Duration and Quality of Weaning [ Time Frame: Within ventilation time ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]This secondary endpoint is assessed as half-days spent under the possible application of a weaning protocol, and spent within specific phases of such a protocol.
- Time of Analgosedation Dependence [ Time Frame: within ICU-LOS ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]This secondary endpoint is assessed as half-days requiring the application of sedatives and analgesics which are also specified.
- Vasopressor Dependence [ Time Frame: within ICU-LOS ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]This secondary endpoint is assessed as half-days spent under vasopressors.
- Time of Antibiotic Treatment [ Time Frame: within ICU-LOS ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]This secondary endpoint is assessed as half-days under antibiotic treatment
- Pneumonias [ Time Frame: within ICU-LOS ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]This secondary endpoint is assessed as episodes (pre-defined by diagnostic criteria) of pneumonia.
- Occurrence and Duration of Sepsis [ Time Frame: within ICU-LOS ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]This secondary endpoint is assessed as the number of episodes and duration of sepsis as pre-defined by diagnostic criteria.
- Number and type of complications associated with the procedure [ Time Frame: 10 days post tracheostomy ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]This secondary endpoint is assessed as the number and types of complications arelated to tracheostomy (i.e. bleeding, mispositioning, malfunction, replacement demand,etc.).
- Cost of Treatment [ Time Frame: within ICU-LOS ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]This secondary endpoint is assessed as the total ICU-costs etsimated by length of stay and severety-derived DRG-multiplicator of each individual patient.
| Estimated Enrollment: | 60 |
| Study Start Date: | September 2009 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | September 2011 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | March 2011 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Early Tracheostomy
Patients randomized to early tracheostomy receive (preferably dilatative) tracheostomy within 3 days from intubation.
|
Procedure: Early Tracheostomy
Tracheostomy is performed as percutaneous dilatative tracheostomy by neurointensivists whenever possible. If anatomically or otherwise indicated, surgical tracheostomy is applied.
|
|
Active Comparator: Prolonged Intubation
Patients randomized to this arm will be tried to wean off the ventilator and get (an) extubation trial(s) if regarded feasible. In case of failure or non-feasibility, they receive tracheostomy between days 7 to 14 from intubation.
|
Procedure: Late Tracheostomy
Tracheostomy is performed as percutaneous dilatative tracheostomy by neurointensivists whenever possible. If anatomically or otherwise indicated, surgical tracheostomy is applied.
|
Detailed Description:
Background: Tracheostomy is a common procedure in critical care patients. Advantages of a short tracheal tube compared to a long orotracheal one are the avoidance of laryngeal lesions and sinusitis, facilitation of nursing care and physiotherapy and the reduction of analgosedatives. The optimal point in time for tracheostomy is still unknown, but it is commonly done not later than 2-3 weeks and after one or several failed extubation trials. Studies in different sets of critical care patients have suggested additional advantages of early tracheostomy: less pneumonias and other complications, more patient comfort, less analgosedation, shorter duration of ventilation and of ICU stay. These questions have not been looked at in non-traumatic neurocritical care patients, although these might have a special weaning benefit by early tracheostomy, being mainly compromised in securing their airway, but not in breathing.
Method: Non-traumatic Neurocritical care patients with ischemic strokes, intracerebral hemorrhage or subarachnoid hemorrhage so severly affected that 2 weeks of ventilation need are estimated, are principally eligible for the study. After randomization, one group receives tracheostomy within the first 3 days after intubation. The other group stays orotracheally intubated and is either weaned and extubated or receives tracheostomy within 7 to 14 days after intubation. Tracheostomy is done as percutaneous dilatation by neurologists.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- age > 18 years
- informed consent from legal representative
- non-traumatic cerebrovascular disease
- Estimated ventilation need for at least 2 weeks
Exclusion Criteria:
- age < 18 years
- informed consent not obtainable
- intubated for more than 3 days
- death within 3 weeks likely
- severe chronic pulmonary disease
- severe chronic cardiac disease
- emergency situation
- intracranial pressure difficult to control
- need for a permanent tracheostoma
- contraindications for dilatative tracheostomy
- severe coagulopathy
- severe respiration difficulties
- intubation/extubation/tube exchange difficulties
Contacts and Locations| Contact: Julian Bösel, Dr, MD | +49-6221-5639145 | julian.boesel@med.uni-heidelberg.de |
| Contact: Thorsten Steiner, Prof, MD | +49-6221-5637531 | thorsten.steiner@med.uni-heidelberg.de |
| Germany | |
| NeuroIntensive Care Unit, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Heidelberg | Recruiting |
| Heidelberg, Germany, D-69120 | |
| Principal Investigator: Julian Bösel, Dr, MD | |
| Principal Investigator: | Bösel Julian, Dr, MD | Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg |
| Study Chair: | Thorsten Steiner, Prof, MD | Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg |
More Information
No publications provided by University of Heidelberg
Additional publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
| Responsible Party: | Julian Bösel, Dr, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Heidelberg |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01261091 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | S-060/2009 |
| Study First Received: | December 15, 2010 |
| Last Updated: | December 15, 2010 |
| Health Authority: | Germany: Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices |
Keywords provided by University of Heidelberg:
|
Neurocritical Care Ischemic Stroke Intracerebral Hemorrhage Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Tracheostomy |
Tracheotomy Percutaneous Dilatative Tracheostomy Weaning Ventilation |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Hemorrhage Ischemia Stroke Cerebral Infarction Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Cerebral Hemorrhage Pathologic Processes Cerebrovascular Disorders |
Brain Diseases Central Nervous System Diseases Nervous System Diseases Vascular Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases Brain Infarction Brain Ischemia Intracranial Hemorrhages |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 19, 2013