Effects of an Evidence Service on Community-based AIDS Service Organizations' Use of Research Evidence
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The investigators have developed an online database called 'Synthesized HIV/AIDS Research Evidence' (SHARE), which is designed to support the use of research evidence by those working in the HIV/AIDS sector. This study will evaluate whether a "full-serve" version of SHARE increases the use of research evidence by community-based organizations as compared to a "self-serve" version. The "full-serve" version of SHARE consists of several components: 1) an online searchable database of synthesized research evidence relevant to HIV/AIDS , 2) periodic emailed updates, 3) access to user-friendly summaries and 4) peer-relevance assessments. The self-serve version consists only of a listing of relevant synthesized research evidence . The investigators will also interview participants in the study to obtain feedback about SHARE, how helpful it was in their work, why it was helpful (or not helpful), what aspects were most and least helpful and why, and recommendations for improving it.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Use of Research Evidence |
Other: SHARE (Synthesized HIV/AIDS Research Evidence) |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Investigator) |
| Official Title: | Effects of an Evidence Service on Community-based AIDS Service Organizations' Use of Research Evidence: A Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial |
- number of logins/month/organization [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The investigators will track utilization of the evidence service at the organizational level by calculating the mean number of logins/month/organization (the total organizational logins/month will be averaged across the number of users from each organization).
- Intention to use research evidence [ Time Frame: Baseline and follow-up (after delivery of 6-month intervnetion) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The investigators will use the theory of planned behaviour to measure participants' intention to use research. Using a manual designed to construct measures based on the theory, colleagues have developed and sought preliminary feedback on a data-collection instrument by first assessing face validity through interviews with key informants and then pilot testing it with 28 policymakers and researchers who completed it after participating in a knowledge translation intervention. In addition, colleagues found the data-collection instrument to have moderate test-retest reliability.
| Enrollment: | 58 |
| Study Start Date: | March 2011 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | January 2013 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | September 2012 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Full-serve evidence service
The full-serve evidence service consists of:
|
Other: SHARE (Synthesized HIV/AIDS Research Evidence)
SHARE (Synthesized HIV/AIDS Research Evidence) consists of several components:
|
|
Active Comparator: Self-serve evidence service
Organizations allocated to the control group will only be provided website access to a listing of systematic reviews that are organized by year of publication with links to the record on PubMed (or another publicly available source when not available on PubMed) and access to worksheets that help community-based organizations find and use research evidence.
|
Other: SHARE (Synthesized HIV/AIDS Research Evidence)
SHARE (Synthesized HIV/AIDS Research Evidence) consists of several components:
|
Detailed Description:
Background To support the use of research evidence by community-based organizations the investigators have developed 'Synthesized HIV/AIDS Research Evidence' (SHARE), which is an evidence service for those working in the HIV sector. SHARE consists of several components: 1) an online searchable database of HIV-relevant systematic reviews (retrievable based on a taxonomy of topics related to HIV/AIDS and open text search), 2) periodic email updates, 3) access to user-friendly summaries, and 4) peer relevance assessments. The objective is to evaluate whether this "full serve" evidence service increases the use of research evidence by community-based organizations as compared to a "self-serve" evidence service.
Methods/design The investigators will conduct a two-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT), along with a follow-up qualitative process study to explore the findings in greater depth. All community-based organizations affiliated with Canadian AIDS Society (n=120) will be invited to participate and will be randomized to receive either the "full-serve" version of SHARE or the "self-serve" version (a listing of relevant systematic reviews with links to records on PubMed and worksheets that help community-based organizations find and use research evidence) using a simple randomized design. All management and staff from each organization will be provided access to the version of SHARE that their organization is allocated to. The trial duration will be 10 months (two-month baseline period, six-month intervention period, and two month cross-over period), the primary outcome measure will be the mean number of logins/month/organization (averaged across the number of users from each organization) between baseline and the end of the intervention period and the secondary outcome will be intention to use research evidence as measured by a survey administered to one key decision-maker from each organization. For the qualitative study, one key organizational decision-maker from 15 organizations in each trial arm (n=30) will be purposively sampled. One-on-one semi-structured interviews will be conducted by telephone on their views about and their experiences with the evidence service they received, how helpful it was in their work, why it was helpful (or not helpful), what aspects were most and least helpful and why, and recommendations for next steps.
Eligibility| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Inclusion Criteria:
- We will include all community-based organizations affiliated with the Canadian AIDS Society and from relevant provincial HIV/AIDS networks in Canada.
Exclusion Criteria:
- We will exclude organizations that do not have at least one key decision-maker who is comfortable participating and corresponding in English.
Contacts and Locations| Canada, Ontario | |
| Ontario HIV Treatment Network | |
| Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4T 1X3 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Michael G Wilson, PhD | McMaster University; Ontario HIV Treatment Network |
| Principal Investigator: | John N Lavis, MD, PhD | McMaster University |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Michael G. Wilson, Scientist, Health Policy & Knowledge Transfer and Exchange, Ontario HIV Treatment Network |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01257724 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | HHS/FHS REB 10-268 |
| Study First Received: | December 9, 2010 |
| Last Updated: | December 14, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | Canada: Ethics Review Committee |
Keywords provided by Ontario HIV Treatment Network:
|
Knowledge translation Community based organizations HIV/AIDS |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 23, 2013