Effects of Allergic Rhinitis on Cognition and Driving (upu055)
Recruitment status was Not yet recruiting
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Previous research has shown that patients suffering from Allergic Rhinitis (AR) not only suffer from direct symptoms of their condition but also report a decreased quality of life. More specific this relates not only to psychological wellbeing but also to diminished cognitive functions such as memory and concentration. In a recent study of a group the investigators showed that in tasks with a higher and longer lasting cognitive load symptomatic AR patient performed significantly worse compared to controls. The finding of a direct relationship between AR symptoms and cognitive functioning strongly suggests implications of AR daily life functioning, safety and workplace productivity. Whereas untreated AR was previously thought only to affect subjective wellbeing it now seems that cognitive functioning might be directly impaired which could lead to potentially dangerous situations in daily life such as driving a car or operating machinery. In this study the investigators will research the effect of an allergen challenge in AR patients on actual driving and memory functions. A comparison in performance will be made between untreated patients and patients treated with systemic or topical drugs.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis |
Drug: cetirizine 10mg and Fluticasone Furoate |
Phase 4 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Pharmacodynamics Study Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor) |
| Official Title: | Effects of Treated and Untreated Allergic Rhinitis on Mood, Cognitive Functions and Actual Driving Performance |
- Standard Deviation of Lateral Position (SDLP) [ Time Frame: 90 - 150 minutes post challenge ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Primary measure is performance in an over the road driving test as measured by the ability to keep within the boundaries of the slower traffic of a highway during a 60 minute driving test
- WLT 15 memory test score [ Time Frame: 120 minutes post challenge ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The secondary outcome score is the total number of words correctly remembered on a 15-word learning test administered during the driving test
| Estimated Enrollment: | 20 |
| Study Start Date: | November 2010 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | June 2011 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | May 2011 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo drug + placebo pollen challenge
Placebo treatment after placebo (sham) nasal pollen challenge
|
Drug: cetirizine 10mg and Fluticasone Furoate
Subjects will undergo a nasal pollen challenge or sham challenge followed by treatment with either a systemic, topical or placebo treatment.
|
|
Active Comparator: placebo drug + active pollen challenge
A placebo treatment with active pollen nasal challenge
|
Drug: cetirizine 10mg and Fluticasone Furoate
Subjects will undergo a nasal pollen challenge or sham challenge followed by treatment with either a systemic, topical or placebo treatment.
|
| Experimental: Systemic drug + active pollen treatment |
Drug: cetirizine 10mg and Fluticasone Furoate
Subjects will undergo a nasal pollen challenge or sham challenge followed by treatment with either a systemic, topical or placebo treatment.
|
| Experimental: topical drug + active pollen challenge |
Drug: cetirizine 10mg and Fluticasone Furoate
Subjects will undergo a nasal pollen challenge or sham challenge followed by treatment with either a systemic, topical or placebo treatment.
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 20 Years to 40 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosed as SAR patient
- Experienced driver
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of neurological or psychiatric disease
- use of psychoactive medication
- clinical abnormalities at medical screening
Contacts and Locations| Netherlands | |
| Maastricht University | Not yet recruiting |
| Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands, 6200MD | |
| Contact: Eric Vuurman, PhD +31433881046 eric.vuurman@maastrichtuniversity.nl | |
| Principal Investigator: Eric Vuurman, PhD | |
More Information
Publications:
| Responsible Party: | Dr. Eric Vuurman, Maastricht University |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01239264 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 10.1.044 |
| Study First Received: | November 10, 2010 |
| Last Updated: | November 10, 2010 |
| Health Authority: | The Netherlands: The central committee on research involving human subjects (CCMO) |
Keywords provided by Maastricht University Medical Center:
|
Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis Driving performance memory mood |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal Rhinitis Nose Diseases Respiratory Tract Diseases Respiratory Hypersensitivity Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases Hypersensitivity, Immediate Hypersensitivity Immune System Diseases Respiratory Tract Infections Fluticasone Cetirizine Anti-Allergic Agents Therapeutic Uses Pharmacologic Actions |
Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating Histamine H1 Antagonists Histamine Antagonists Histamine Agents Neurotransmitter Agents Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Physiological Effects of Drugs Bronchodilator Agents Autonomic Agents Peripheral Nervous System Agents Anti-Asthmatic Agents Respiratory System Agents Dermatologic Agents Anti-Inflammatory Agents |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 16, 2013