Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) for WBRT With SIB Using Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT)
This study is currently recruiting participants.
Verified March 2012 by Emory University

First Received on September 30, 2010.   Last Updated on March 27, 2012   History of Changes
Sponsor: Emory University
Information provided by (Responsible Party): Roshan Sudhir Prabhu, Emory University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01218542
  Purpose

Brain metastases are the most common adult intracranial tumor, occurring in approximately 10% to 30% of adult cancer patients, and represent an important cause of morbidity and mortality. The most widely used treatment for patients with multiple brain metastases is whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT). The use of WBRT after resection or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been proven to be effective in terms of improving local control of brain metastases.

RapidArc (RA) (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) is a new method of delivering radiation that uses "arcs" to deliver highly conformal intensity modulated three dimensional dose distributions. The purpose of this investigation is to evaluate an alternative strategy for giving WBRT with highly focal boost to gross visible lesions in patients with brain metastasis.

In this study, the investigators plan to assess the tolerability of using volumetric modulated arc therapy (RapidArc) on patients with brain metastasis to simultaneously treat the entire brain with focal areas of higher doses (boost) to grossly identified lesions on MRI scan to try to improve local control.

Several studies have indicated that patients at high risk of brain involvement, but without gross brain metastases, achieve high levels of intracranial control with lower "prophylactic disease" doses. The typical prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) dose for lung cancer is 25 Gy in 10 fractions. With RapidArc technology, the whole brain at risk could be given a reduced PCI dose, while the gross disease seen on MRI can be boosted with higher doses known to lead to better local control.

There will be a single group based on the "prophylactic" regimen for whole brain radiation. Dose escalation enrollment will be done sequentially within this group. For example, when the first dose level has completed accrual and is closed to new enrollment, all patients at that dose level will be monitored. After review all all patients, the investigators will make the decision whether or not to escalate to the next dose level. Patients will know which specific dose level they are assigned to.

After treatment that will take 10 days, patients will be followed closely for treatment outcome and possible side effects. Patients will be asked to complete three quick surveys at each follow-up appointment regarding quality of life and memory in addition to standard of care surveillance brain MRI and physical exam. The investigators hope to enroll between 12 and 24 patients at Emory University Hospital (EUH) and EUH Midtown.


Condition Intervention Phase
Neoplasm Metastasis
Radiation: VMAT
Phase 1

Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Endpoint Classification: Safety Study
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: Phase I Study of Whole Brain Radiation Therapy With Simultaneous Boost to Gross Metastatic Tumor Volume Using Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT)

Resource links provided by NLM:


Further study details as provided by Emory University:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • Number of Participants with Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability. [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
    The MTD will be defined as either the dose when a grade 3 or greater toxicity judged to be at least possibly due to the treatment develops in 2 of 6 patients in a dose group within 3 months of the treatment or the highest dose level (group 3) if < 2 of 6 patients develop a grade 3 or greater toxicity judged to be at least possibly due to the treatment at that dose within 3 months of treatment. If > 2 of 6 patients develop a grade 3 or greater toxicity at a dose level, the dose is de-escalated to the prior group and that group is expanded to 6 patients.


Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • Local Brain control [ Time Frame: 2 year follow-up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Defined as non-progression of gross metastatic brain lesions seen on brain MRI treated with dose escalated simultaneous infield boost.

  • Regional brain control [ Time Frame: 2 year follow-up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Defined as non-progression in areas of the brain not involved with gross metastatic lesions on brain MRI treated with the lower "prophylactic" whole brain radiation dose.

  • Brain progression-free survival [ Time Frame: 2 year follow-up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Defined as period of time from study entry to to death from any cause or brain tumor recurrence or progression.

  • Overall Survival [ Time Frame: 2 year follow-up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Defined time from study entry to death from any cause.

  • Neurocognitive effects [ Time Frame: 2 year follow-up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

    Defined as proportion of patients with any significant changes in 3 neurocognitive tests to be given at baseline before therapy, then after radiation at 1 month, 3 months, and every 3 months after that for up to 2 years.

    Memory: Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised

    Global Function: Mini-Mental Status Examination

    Cognitive Function (self-report): Medical Outcomes Cognitive Scale


  • Quality of Life outcomes [ Time Frame: 2 year follow-up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Defined as the proportion of patients with any significant changes in self reported quality of life scale survey - FACT-Br (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain) to be given before radiation, then after radiation at 1 month, 3 months, and every 3 months after that up to 2 years.


Estimated Enrollment: 24
Study Start Date: December 2010
Estimated Primary Completion Date: October 2014 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Arms Assigned Interventions
Experimental: Single Arm

This cohort is based on giving 25 Gy in 10 fractions to the whole brain (prophylactic dose).

SIB = simultaneous infield boost to gross disease fx = fraction

Group Dose (to lesions) SIB dose/fx

Cohort baseline 2.5 Gy x 10 fx 0 SIB

** resection cavity 3 Gy x 10 fx 0.5 Gy SIB

Cohort group 1 4.5 Gy x 10 fx 2 Gy SIB

Cohort group 2 5.25 Gy x 10 fx 2.75 Gy SIB

Cohort group 3 6 Gy x 10 fx 3.5 Gy SIB

Radiation: VMAT
Using volumetric modulated arc therapy to give simultaneous infield boost to gross metastatic brain lesions during whole brain radiation therapy.

  Eligibility

Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older
Genders Eligible for Study:   Both
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pathologic proven diagnosis of solid tumor malignancy.
  • Age ≥ 18.
  • KPS ≥ 70.
  • First presentation of brain metastases.
  • Mini Mental Status Exam (MMSE) ≥ 18 prior to study entry.
  • RPA class I (KPS≥70, primary cancer controlled, age<65, metastases in brain only) or class II (lack of one or more of class I criteria)
  • One to ten brain metastatic lesions.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous whole brain brain radiotherapy
  • RPA class III (KPS<70).
  • Radiosensitive (eg. small cell lung carcinomas, germ cell tumors, leukemias, or lymphomas) or unknown tumor histologies.
  • Concurrent chemotherapy (no chemotherapy starting 14 days before start of radiation to 14 days after completion of radiation).
  • Evidence of leptomeningeal disease by MRI and/or CSF cytology.
  • Current pregnancy
  • Previous radiosurgery to any currently progressive gross metastatic disease
  • Previous radiosurgery to any intracranial site within the prior 6 weeks
  Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01218542

Contacts
Contact: Hui-Kuo Shu, MD PhD 404-778-2161 hgshu@emory.edu
Contact: Roshan S Prabhu, MD 904-422-3785 rprabhu@emory.edu

Locations
United States, Georgia
Emory University Winship Cancer Institute Recruiting
Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
Contact: Hui-Kuo Shu, MD PhD     404-778-2161     hgshu@emory.edu    
Contact: Roshan Prabhu, MD     904-422-3785     rprabhu@emory.edu    
Principal Investigator: Hui-Kuo Shu, MD PhD            
Emory University Hospital Midtown Recruiting
Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30308
Contact: Liza Stapleford, MD     404-778-3473     lstaple@emory.edu    
Contact: Hui-Kuo Shu, MD PhD     404-778-2161     hgshu@emory.edu    
Principal Investigator: Liza Stapleford, MD            
Sponsors and Collaborators
Emory University
Investigators
Principal Investigator: Hui-Kuo Shu, MD Phd Emory University
  More Information

Publications:
Zimm S, Wampler GL, Stablein D, Hazra T, Young HF. Intracerebral metastases in solid-tumor patients: natural history and results of treatment. Cancer. 1981 Jul 15;48(2):384-94.
Sundström JT, Minn H, Lertola KK, Nordman E. Prognosis of patients treated for intracranial metastases with whole-brain irradiation. Ann Med. 1998 Jun;30(3):296-9.
CHAO JH, PHILLIPS R, NICKSON JJ. Roentgen-ray therapy of cerebral metastases. Cancer. 1954 Jul;7(4):682-9. No abstract available.
Gaspar L, Scott C, Rotman M, Asbell S, Phillips T, Wasserman T, McKenna WG, Byhardt R. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) of prognostic factors in three Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) brain metastases trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997 Mar 1;37(4):745-51.
Patchell RA, Regine WF. The rationale for adjuvant whole brain radiation therapy with radiosurgery in the treatment of single brain metastases. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2003 Apr;2(2):111-5. Review.
Arbit E, Wro?ski M, Burt M, Galicich JH. The treatment of patients with recurrent brain metastases. A retrospective analysis of 109 patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer. Cancer. 1995 Sep 1;76(5):765-73.
Andrews DW, Scott CB, Sperduto PW, Flanders AE, Gaspar LE, Schell MC, Werner-Wasik M, Demas W, Ryu J, Bahary JP, Souhami L, Rotman M, Mehta MP, Curran WJ Jr. Whole brain radiation therapy with or without stereotactic radiosurgery boost for patients with one to three brain metastases: phase III results of the RTOG 9508 randomised trial. Lancet. 2004 May 22;363(9422):1665-72.
Lagerwaard FJ, van der Hoorn EA, Verbakel WF, Haasbeek CJ, Slotman BJ, Senan S. Whole-brain radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost to multiple brain metastases using volumetric modulated arc therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Sep 1;75(1):253-9. Epub 2009 Jul 4.
Bauman G, Yartsev S, Fisher B, Kron T, Laperriere N, Heydarian M, VanDyk J. Simultaneous infield boost with helical tomotherapy for patients with 1 to 3 brain metastases. Am J Clin Oncol. 2007 Feb;30(1):38-44.

Responsible Party: Roshan Sudhir Prabhu, Co-Investigator, Emory University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01218542     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: WBRT-RA-2010
Study First Received: September 30, 2010
Last Updated: March 27, 2012
Health Authority: United States: Institutional Review Board

Keywords provided by Emory University:
Secondary brain malignancies
RapidArc
Volumetric modulated arc therapy

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Neoplasms
Neoplasm Metastasis
Neoplastic Processes
Pathologic Processes

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 23, 2012