Conservative Versus Aggressive Discectomy for Primary Disc Herniation With Radiculopathy
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Summary: This is a prospective randomize study to compare conservative and aggressive discectomy for treatment of disc herniation with radiculopathy.
Study hypothesis: The investigators believe that conservative discectomy could preserve a higher disc space and has a better long-term outcomes.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Herniated Disc |
Procedure: conservative discectomy Procedure: aggressive discectomy |
Phase 4 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Prospective Randomized Trails for Primary Disc Herniation With Radiculopathy:Conservative Versus Aggressive Discectomy |
- patients satisfaction [ Time Frame: 6 weeks after intervention ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- patients satisfaction [ Time Frame: 3 months after intervention ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- patients satisfaction [ Time Frame: 6 months after intervention ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- patients satisfaction [ Time Frame: 1st year after intervention ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- patients satisfaction [ Time Frame: 3rd year after intervention ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- patients satisfaction [ Time Frame: 5th year after intervention ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- recurrence rate of disc herniation [ Time Frame: 6 weeks after operation ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- recurrence rate of disc herniation [ Time Frame: 3 months after operation ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- recurrence rate of disc herniation [ Time Frame: 6 months after operation ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- recurrence rate of disc herniation [ Time Frame: 1st year after operation ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- recurrence rate of disc herniation [ Time Frame: 3rd year after operation ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- recurrence rate of disc herniation [ Time Frame: 5th year after operation ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- height of disc space [ Time Frame: 6 weeks after operation ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- height of disc space [ Time Frame: 3 months after operation ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- height of disc space [ Time Frame: 6 months after operation ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- height of disc operation [ Time Frame: 1st year after operation ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- height of disc space [ Time Frame: 3rd year after operation ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- height of disc space [ Time Frame: 5th year after operation ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Estimated Enrollment: | 100 |
| Study Start Date: | September 2009 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | December 2015 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | December 2012 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: CS
conservative discectomy
|
Procedure: conservative discectomy
a smaller incision with removal of the disc fragment with little invasion of the disc
|
| Active Comparator: AS |
Procedure: aggressive discectomy
a large open incision with aggressive removal of the disc fragments and curettage of the disc space
|
Detailed Description:
objectives:to compare the effect of two type surgery(conservative discectomy and aggressive discectomy)on disc herniation with radiculopathy after long-term follow-up.
methods:the patients who were confirmed suffer from disc herniation with radiculopathy and failed to nonsurgical treatment will be divided into two groups, and will be follow up 3~6 years for seeking the effect on disc space preservation and recurrent.
outcome measures:the rate of pain release and patients satisfaction were measured by SF-36,ODI,VAS,score post-OP. the height of disc was measured on X-ray film by the end point.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 40 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Duration of symptoms: 6 or more weeks.
- Treatments tried: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medical therapy and physical therapy.
- Surgical screening: Persistent radicular pain provoked by moderate exercise, sitting, increased abdominal pressure, decreased mobility, list (scoliosis), straight leg raising.
- Tests: MRI to confirm diagnosis and level(s).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previous lumbar spine surgery.
- Not a surgical candidate for any of these reasons: Overall health which makes spinal surgery too life-threatening to be an appropriate alternative, dramatic improvement with conservative care, or inability (for any reason) to undergo surgery within 6 months.
- Possible pregnancy.
- Active malignancy: A patient with a history of any invasive malignancy (except non-melanoma skin cancer) is ineligible unless he or she has been treated with a curative intent AND there has been no clinical signs or symptoms of the malignancy for at least 5 years.
- Current fracture, infection, and/or deformity (greater than 15 degrees of lumbar scoliosis, using Cobb measure technique) of the spine.
- Age less than 18 years.
- Cauda Equina syndrome or progressive neurological deficit (usually requiring urgent surgery).
- Unavailability for follow-up (planning to move, no telephone, etc.) or inability to complete data surveys.
- Symptoms less than 6 weeks.
- Patient currently enrolled in any experimental "spine related" study.
Contacts and Locations| Contact: Dongsheng Huang, MD. | 00862081332553 | huangdongshen18@hotmail.com |
| China, Guangdong | |
| Sun Yat-Sen memorial hospital | Recruiting |
| Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510120 | |
| Contact: Dongsheng Huang, MD 00862081332553 huangdongshen18@hotmail.com | |
| Principal Investigator: Dongsheng Huang, MD | |
| Principal Investigator: | Dongsheng Huang, MD | Sun Yat-sen University |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Dongsheng Huang, MD., Sun Yat-sen University |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01204008 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | zseyhds2 |
| Study First Received: | September 13, 2010 |
| Last Updated: | September 16, 2010 |
| Health Authority: | China: Food and Drug Administration |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Hernia Intervertebral Disk Displacement Radiculopathy Pathological Conditions, Anatomical Spinal Diseases |
Bone Diseases Musculoskeletal Diseases Peripheral Nervous System Diseases Neuromuscular Diseases Nervous System Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 21, 2013