Correlation of High Resolution Esophageal Manometry With Symptoms
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
High Resolution Manometry is a new technology that utilizes 36 solid state sensors on a thin catheter spaced at 1-cm intervals. One can more effectively measure the pressure of the esophagus. It includes a sophisticated software to display the pressures data as color topography plot using time, length of the esophagus and pressure within the entire esophagus. It is unclear if this technology improvement actually correlates with patient's symptoms.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Achalasia Dysphagia GERD Chest Pain Post Fundoplication |
Procedure: High Resolution Manometry |
| Study Type: | Observational |
| Study Design: | Observational Model: Case Control Time Perspective: Prospective |
| Official Title: | Correlation of High Resolution Esophageal Manometry With Symptoms |
- Differences and similarities in patients with achalasia [ Time Frame: at 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]To determine the differences and similarities in the clinical presentation of patients with type 1, 2 and 3 achalasia based on the Chicago classification for HRM
- Esophageal dysmotility in patients with dysphagia and GERD symptoms [ Time Frame: at 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]To determine the prevalence of esophageal dysmotility using the Chicago classification based on primary chief complaints.
- HRM parameters [ Time Frame: at 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]To determine if HRM parameters reflect esophageal physiology between contractile strength of the esophagus and GEJ residual pressure obstructing esophageal flow.
- Esophageal dysmotility in patients with postfundoplication compliants [ Time Frame: at 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]To determine the prevalence of esophageal dysmotility using the Chicago classification based in patients with postfundoplication complaints.
- Correlation between HRM and symptoms [ Time Frame: At 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]To determine if HRM parameters reflect symptom presentations.
| Estimated Enrollment: | 300 |
| Study Start Date: | February 2010 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | March 2013 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | February 2013 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Groups/Cohorts | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Type I achalasia
classic achalasia: complete esophageal motor failure
|
Procedure: High Resolution Manometry
High Resolution Manometry which uses 36 solid state sensors spaced at 1-cm intervals, positioned from the hypopharynx to the stomach.
Other Names:
|
|
Type II achalasia
compression achalasia: simultaneous panesophageal pressurization with aperistalsis
|
Procedure: High Resolution Manometry
High Resolution Manometry which uses 36 solid state sensors spaced at 1-cm intervals, positioned from the hypopharynx to the stomach.
Other Names:
|
|
Type III achalasia
spastic achalasia with aperistalsis: 100% spasm
|
Procedure: High Resolution Manometry
High Resolution Manometry which uses 36 solid state sensors spaced at 1-cm intervals, positioned from the hypopharynx to the stomach.
Other Names:
|
Detailed Description:
In a 2007 retrospective study performed using this technology, 400 subjects referred to the motility lab underwent high resolution manometry (HRM) for complaints of dysphasia, gastroesophageal reflux disease, chest pain and miscellaneous complaints. HRM offered greater detail of individual contracting segments of the esophagus, including the duration of contraction and propagation of individual contractions.
For example, a new subclass of achalasia was defined by HRM. In this classification, achalasia is divided into types 1, 2 and 3. Type 1 corresponds to classic achalasia (complete esophageal motor failure), type 2 is a compression achalasia (simultaneous panesophageal pressurization with aperistalsis), and type 3 is spastic achalasia with aperistalsis (100% spasm). However, it is unclear if this categorization represents a spectrum of disease among patients with achalasia, or it represents distinct subgroups of patients with different symptom presentation and etiology.
This study will attempt to correlate the data from HRM to patient's chief compliants, symptom severity, and clinical presentation.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
| Sampling Method: | Non-Probability Sample |
Subjects will be recruited from patients referred to the University Medical Associates motility lab for high resolution manometry
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subjects who are referred to the motility lab to undergoing esophageal HRM for various clinical indications.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnancy
- Unable to give consent
- Less than 18 years old
- Prisoner
Contacts and Locations| United States, Kentucky | |
| University of Louisville | |
| Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40202 | |
| Principal Investigator: | John Wo, MD | University of Louisville School of Medicine |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | John Wo, M.D., University of Louisville School of Medicine |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01202929 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 10.0057 |
| Study First Received: | September 14, 2010 |
| Last Updated: | August 4, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |
Keywords provided by University of Louisville:
|
High Resolution Manometry achalasia dysphagia |
GERD chest pain Post fundoplication |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Chest Pain Deglutition Disorders Esophageal Achalasia Gastroesophageal Reflux Pain Signs and Symptoms |
Esophageal Diseases Gastrointestinal Diseases Digestive System Diseases Pharyngeal Diseases Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases Esophageal Motility Disorders |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 19, 2013