A Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of TC-5214 as an Adjunct Therapy in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder.
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to determine if TC-5214 or placebo (a tablet that looks like a medicine tablet or capsule, but contains no active medicine) is safe and effective when taken together with another antidepressant.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Major Depressive Disorder |
Drug: TC-5214 Drug: Placebo |
Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Parallel Group Placebo-Controlled Phase III, Efficacy and Safety Study of 3 Fixed Dose Groups of TC-5214 (S-mecamylamine) as an Adjunct to an Antidepressants in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder Who Exhibit an Inadequate Response to Antidepressant Therapy |
- Change in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score From Randomization to End of Treatment. [ Time Frame: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]A 10-item scale for the evaluation of depressive symptoms. Each MADRS item is rated on a 0 to 6 scale. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores; the total score can range from 0 to 60. Higher MADRS scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms.
- Response in Depressive Symptoms of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), Defined as a ≥50% Reduction From Randomization (Week 8) in MADRS Total Score at End of Treatment (Week 16) [ Time Frame: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
The percentage of patients with a ≥50% reduction from randomization (Week 8) in MADRS total score at end of treatment (Week 16) was calculated.
MADRS is 10-item scale for the evaluation of depressive symptoms. Each MADRS item is rated on a 0 to 6 scale. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores; the total score can range from 0 to 60. Higher MADRS scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms.
- Remission in Depressive Symptoms of MDD, Defined as MADRS Total Score of ≤8 at End of Treatment (Week 16) [ Time Frame: Week 16 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
The percentage of patients with a MADRS total score of ≤8 at end of treatment (Week 16) was calculated.
MADRS is 10-item scale for the evaluation of depressive symptoms. Each MADRS item is rated on a 0 to 6 scale. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores; the total score can range from 0 to 60. Higher MADRS scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms.
- Early and Sustained Response, Defined as a ≥50% Reduction From Randomization (Week 8) in MADRS Total Score and a MADRS Total Score of ≤12 at Week 10, Week 12, Week 14, and End of Treatment (Week 16) [ Time Frame: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16); Week 10, Week 12, Week 14, and Week 16 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
The percentage of patients with a ≥50% reduction from randomization (Week 8) in MADRS total score and a MADRS total score of ≤12 at Week 10, Week 12, Week 14, and end of treatment (Week 16) was calculated.
MADRS is 10-item scale for the evaluation of depressive symptoms. Each MADRS item is rated on a 0 to 6 scale. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores; the total score can range from 0 to 60. Higher MADRS scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms.
- Sustained Response, Defined as a ≥50% Reduction From Randomization (Week 8) in MADRS Total Score and a MADRS Total Score of ≤12 at Week 12, Week 14, and End of Treatment (Week 16) [ Time Frame: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16); Week 12, Week 14, and Week 16 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
The percentage of patients with a ≥50% reduction from randomization (Week 8) in MADRS total score and a MADRS total score of ≤12 at Week 12, Week 14, and end of treatment (Week 16) was calculated.
MADRS is 10-item scale for the evaluation of depressive symptoms. Each MADRS item is rated on a 0 to 6 scale. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores; the total score can range from 0 to 60. Higher MADRS scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms.
- Sustained Remission, Defined as a MADRS Total Score of ≤8 at Week 12, Week 14, and End of Treatment (Week 16) [ Time Frame: Week 12, Week 14, Week 16 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
The percentage of patients with a MADRS total score of ≤8 at Week 12, Week 14, and end of treatment (Week 16)was calculated.
MADRS is 10-item scale for the evaluation of depressive symptoms. Each MADRS item is rated on a 0 to 6 scale. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores; the total score can range from 0 to 60. Higher MADRS scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms.
- Change in Depressive Symptoms From Randomization (Week 8) to End of Treatment (Week 16) as Measured by Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression-17 Items (HAMD-17) Total Score [ Time Frame: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]A 17-item, clinician-rated scale that assesses depressive symptoms. The HAMD-17 consists of 17 symptoms, each of which is rated from 0 to 2 or 0 to 4, where 0 is none/absent. The HAMD-17 total score is calculated as the sum of the 17 individual symptom scores; the total score can range from 0 to 52. Higher HAMD-17 scores indicate more severe depression.
- Change in the Clinician-rated Global Outcome of Severity as Measured by the Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score From Randomization (Week 8) to End of Treatment (Week 16) [ Time Frame: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]A 3-part, clinician-administered scale that rates the improvement or worsening of the patient's illness from randomization (baseline). Each item is scored on a 1 to 7 scale. Higher CGI-S scores indicate greater illness severity.
- Response in the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Defined as CGI-I Rating of "Very Much Improved" or "Much Improved" From Randomization (Week 8) to End of Treatment (Week 16) [ Time Frame: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]A 3-part, clinician-administered scale that rates the improvement or worsening of the patient's illness from randomization (baseline). Each item is scored on a 1 to 7 scale. CGI-I scores >4 indicate worsening, while scores <4 indicate improvement.
- Change in Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score From Randomization (Week 8) to End of Treatment (Week 16) [ Time Frame: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]A 14-item clinician-administered scale for the evaluation of anxiety symptoms. Each HAM-A item is rated on a 0 to 4 scale. Higher HAM-A scores indicate higher levels of anxiety.
- Change in MADRS Total Score From Randomization (Week 8) to Week 9 [ Time Frame: Randomization (Week 8) to Week 9 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]A 10-item scale for the evaluation of depressive symptoms. Each MADRS item is rated on a 0 to 6 scale. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores; the total score can range from 0 to 60. Higher MADRS scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms.
- Change in MADRS Total Score From Randomization (Week 8) to Week 10 [ Time Frame: Randomization (Week 8) to Week 10 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]A 10-item scale for the evaluation of depressive symptoms. Each MADRS item is rated on a 0 to 6 scale. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores; the total score can range from 0 to 60. Higher MADRS scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms.
- Change in MADRS Total Score From Randomization (Week 8) to Week 12 [ Time Frame: Randomization (Week 8) to Week 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]A 10-item scale for the evaluation of depressive symptoms. Each MADRS item is rated on a 0 to 6 scale. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores; the total score can range from 0 to 60. Higher MADRS scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms.
- Change in MADRS Total Score From Randomization (Week 8) to Week 14 [ Time Frame: Randomization (Week 8) to Week 14 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]A 10-item scale for the evaluation of depressive symptoms. Each MADRS item is rated on a 0 to 6 scale. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores; the total score can range from 0 to 60. Higher MADRS scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms.
- Change in Functional Impairment From Randomization (Week 8) to End of Treatment (Week 16) as Measured by the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score [ Time Frame: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) is 5-item, self-administered scale that measures the extent a patient is impaired by their disease. Higher scores indicate more severe impairment. The SDS total score is calculated as the sum of the score for the 3 inter-correlated domains (school/work, social life, and family life/home responsibilities) and ranges from 0 (unimpaired) to 30 (highly impaired).
- Change in Functional Impairment From Randomization (Week 8) to End of Treatment (Week 16) as Measured by SDS Work/School Domain Score [ Time Frame: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]A 5-item, self-administered scale that measures the extent a patient is impaired by their disease. Higher scores indicate more severe impairment. The 3 inter-correlated domains are school/work, social life, and family life/home responsibilities. The numerical rating for the work/school domain score is 0- 10, where 10 is considered to be 'highly impaired'.
- Change in Functional Impairment From Randomization (Week 8) to End of Treatment (Week 16) as Measured by SDS Social Life Domain Score [ Time Frame: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]A 5-item, self-administered scale that measures the extent a patient is impaired by their disease. Higher scores indicate more severe impairment. The 3 inter-correlated domains are school/work, social life, and family life/home responsibilities. The numerical rating for the SDS social life domain score is 0- 10, where 10 is considered to be 'highly impaired'.
- Change in Functional Impairment From Randomization (Week 8) to End of Treatment (Week 16) as Measured by SDS Family Life/Home Responsibilities Domain Score [ Time Frame: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]A 5-item, self-administered scale that measures the extent a patient is impaired by their disease. Higher scores indicate more severe impairment. The 3 inter-correlated domains are school/work, social life, and family life/home responsibilities. The numerical rating for the SDS family life/home responsibilities domain score is 0- 10, where 10 is considered to be 'highly impaired'.
- Change in Overall Quality of Life and Satisfaction From Randomization (Week 8) to End of Treatment (Week 16) by Assessing the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF) % Maximum Total Score [ Time Frame: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The Q-LES-Q-SF (Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form) total score is derived by summing item scores 1 to 14. Higher scores are indicative of greater enjoyment or satisfaction in each domain. The Q-LES-Q-SF % maximum total score is calculated as 100% × (Q-LES-Q-SF total score - 14) / 56, and can range from 0% to 100%.
- Change From Randomization (Week 8) to End of Treatment (Week 16) in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form (Q LES-Q-SF) Item 15 [ Time Frame: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The Q-LES-Q-SF (Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form) measures the patient's satisfaction with medication and overall quality of life. The 15th item queries respondents' satisfaction with the medication they are taking. Higher scores are indicative of greater enjoyment or satisfaction in each domain.
- Change From Randomization (Week 8) to End of Treatment (Week 16) in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form (Q LES-Q-SF) Item 16 [ Time Frame: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The Q-LES-Q-SF (Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form) measures the patient's satisfaction with medication and overall quality of life. The 16th item is a global rating of overall life satisfaction and contentment. Higher scores are indicative of greater enjoyment or satisfaction in each domain.
- Change in EuroQol - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) From Randomization (Week 8) to End of Treatment (Week 16) [ Time Frame: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]A self-assessment questionnaire that provides 2 measures of health status. The EQ-5D index score is a weighted linear combination over 5 dimensions of health status. The score for each of the 5 dimensions can range from 1 to 3, and an equation is used to calculate the EQ-5D index score. The EQ-5D index score can range from possible negative values to a maximum of 1.0. The EQ-VAS is a visual analog scale with a range of 0 to 100. For both variables, a higher score indicates a better health state.
| Enrollment: | 696 |
| Study Start Date: | September 2010 |
| Study Completion Date: | January 2012 |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: 0.1 mg BID TC-5214
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI)/Serotonin/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) + TC-5214, 0.1 mg BID
|
Drug: TC-5214
Twice daily for 8 weeks.
|
|
Experimental: 1 mg BID TC-5214
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI)/Serotonin/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) + TC-5214, 1 mg BID
|
Drug: TC-5214
Twice daily for 8 weeks.
|
|
Experimental: 4 mg BID TC-5214
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI)/Serotonin/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) + TC-5214, 4 mg BID
|
Drug: TC-5214
Twice daily for 8 weeks.
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI)/Serotonin/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) + Placebo BID
|
Drug: Placebo
Twice daily for 8 weeks.
|
Detailed Description:
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Parallel Group Placebo-Controlled Phase III, Efficacy and Safety Study of 3 Fixed Dose Groups of TC-5214 (S-mecamylamine) as an Adjunct to an Antidepressants in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder Who Exhibit an Inadequate Response to Antidepressant Therapy
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 65 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Provision of signed and dated informed consent before initiation of any study-related procedures.
- The patient must have a clinical diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD) with inadequate response to no more than one antidepressant.
- Outpatient status at enrollment and randomization.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with a lifetime history of bipolar disorder, psychotic disorder or post-traumatic stress disorder.
- Patients with a history of suicide attempts in the past year and/or seen by the investigator as having a significant history of risk of suicide or homicide.
- History of renal insufficiency or impairment or conditions that could affect absorption or metabolism of investigational product.
Contacts and Locations
Show 87 Study Locations| Study Director: | Hans A Eriksson, MD,PhD, MBA | AstraZeneca R&D |
| Principal Investigator: | Hans-Jürgen Möller, Prof. Dr. | University Hospital München |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | AstraZeneca |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01197508 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | D4130C00005 |
| Study First Received: | September 8, 2010 |
| Results First Received: | June 26, 2012 |
| Last Updated: | September 27, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | Argentina: Administracion Nacional de Medicamentos, Alimentos y Tecnologia Medica Brazil: National Health Surveillance Agency Chile: Instituto de Salud Publica de Chile Colombia: INVIMA Instituto Nacional de Vigilancia de Medicamentos y Alimentos France: Afssaps - Agence française de sécurité sanitaire des produits de santé (Saint-Denis) Germany: Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices Spain: Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios Bulgaria: Bulgarian Drug Agency Poland: Ministry of Health Romania: National Medicines Agency Russia: FSI Scientific Center of Expertise of Medical Application Russia: Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation Serbia and Montenegro: Agency for Drugs and Medicinal Devices Slovakia: State Institute for Drug Control South Africa: Medicines Control Council Ukraine: State Pharmacological Center - Ministry of Health |
Keywords provided by AstraZeneca:
|
Major Depressive Disorder, MDD, Depression |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Depressive Disorder Depression Depressive Disorder, Major Mood Disorders Mental Disorders Behavioral Symptoms Antidepressive Agents Serotonin Uptake Inhibitors Psychotropic Drugs |
Central Nervous System Agents Therapeutic Uses Pharmacologic Actions Neurotransmitter Uptake Inhibitors Neurotransmitter Agents Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Serotonin Agents Physiological Effects of Drugs |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 23, 2013