Endocardial Pacing in On-table Non-responders in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
Recruitment status was Recruiting
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to determine whether left ventricular endocardial pacing exhibits a greater acute hemodynamic response during biventricular pacing in patients who do not show this response to standard cardiac resynchronization therapy.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Heart Failure |
Procedure: temporary left ventricular endocardial pacing |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Non-Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Non-Responders in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy |
- change in acute hemodynamic response to CRT defined as an increase in LV dP/dtmax of ≥10% during left endocardial pacing compared to left epicardial pacing. [ Time Frame: baseline and 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- improvement in NYHA functional class ≥1 [ Time Frame: baseline and 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- decrease in MLWHFQ of ≥9 points [ Time Frame: baseline and 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- decrease in LVESV of ≥15% [ Time Frame: baseline and 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- increase in LVEF of ≥5% [ Time Frame: baseline and 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Estimated Enrollment: | 40 |
| Study Start Date: | August 2010 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | April 2012 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | April 2012 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
on-table non-responder
patients who do not show an improvement of more than or equal to 15% in LV dP/dtmax measured immediately after implantation of a cardiac resynchronization therapy device
|
Procedure: temporary left ventricular endocardial pacing
a temporary pacemaker lead will be introduced through the aortic valve to evaluate the effect of left ventricular endocardial pacing. Four different pacing sites (basal and apical septal, basal and apical lateral) will be investigated with measurement of LV dP/dtmax. Afterwards, the endocardial pacing lead will be removed.
|
|
No Intervention: on-table responders
patients who do show an improvement of more than or equal to 15% in LV dP/dtmax measured immediately after implantation of a cardiac resynchronization therapy device
|
Detailed Description:
Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) with biventricular pacemakers and implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICD) has proven to be a valuable therapy in selected patients with systolic heart failure, ameliorating both morbidity and mortality. However, with current selection criteria and implant technique, about 20 to 30 % of patients remain non-responders. Non-responders might be due to failing selection criteria or methodology in casu echocardiography. However, an important number of non-responders may result of sub-optimal positioning of the left ventricular lead, remote from the site of delayed activation. Endocardial left ventricular stimulation may ameliorate the shortcomings of epicardial stimulation. The advantage of an endocardial approach is the absence of phrenic nerve stimulation which regularly complicates epicardial pacing, a more predictable pacing threshold and much less restriction to position the lead in the area of interest. Transseptal left ventricular endocardial pacing has already been used in patients in whom standard epicardial pacing was not applicable.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥18y
- LVEF ≤35%
- QRS-duration ≥0.12 seconds
- NYHA functional class III or IV despite optimal medical therapy defined as use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin-II receptor blocker and beta-blockers unless they are not tolerated or contra-indicated
- sinus rhythm or atrial fibrillation
Exclusion Criteria:
- episode of acute heart failure ≤3 months
- change in dosage of beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin-II receptor blockers ≤3 months
- unstable angina pectoris, acute myocardial infarction, percutaneous intervention or coronary bypass surgery ≤3 months
- chronic atrial arrhythmias other than atrial fibrillation
- any mechanical or biological valve prosthesis
- atrial septal defect
- right-to-left shunt
- severe pulmonary hypertension (systolic pulmonary artery pressure >90 mmHg)
- uncontrolled arterial hypertension
- known allergy to sulphur hexafluoride
- end-stage renal or hepatic disease
- inability to provide written informed consent
- pregnancy or childbearing potential without use of birth-control measurements
- general contra-indications to magnetic resonance imaging
Contacts and Locations| Contact: Patrick Houthuizen, MD | +31 (0)40-2397000 | aasphn@cze.nl |
| Contact: Frank Bracke, MD, PhD | +31 (0)40-2397000 | carfbe@cze.nl |
| Netherlands | |
| Catharina Ziekenhuis | Recruiting |
| Eindhoven, Netherlands | |
| Contact: Patrick Houthuizen, MD +31 (0)40-2397000 aasphn@cze.nl | |
| Contact: Frank Bracke, MD, PhD +31 (0)40-2397000 carfbe@cze.nl | |
| Principal Investigator: Patrick Houthuizen, MD | |
| Sub-Investigator: Frank Bracke, MD, PhD | |
| Principal Investigator: | Patrick Houthuizen, MD | Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | P. Houthuizen MD, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01193712 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | NL26963.060.09 |
| Study First Received: | August 25, 2010 |
| Last Updated: | June 22, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | Netherlands: The Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects (CCMO) |
Keywords provided by Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven:
|
Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Heart Failure Heart Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on June 13, 2013