The Possible Influence of Health Promotion Coaching on Health Related and Organizational Outcomes Among Nurses

The recruitment status of this study is unknown because the information has not been verified recently.
Verified July 2010 by Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center.
Recruitment status was  Not yet recruiting
Sponsor:
Collaborator:
Tel Aviv University
Information provided by:
Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01172834
First received: July 18, 2010
Last updated: July 29, 2010
Last verified: July 2010
  Purpose

Strong evidence shows that physical activity (PA) has favorable psychological and health related outcomes. However, most employees do not perform enough PA to achieve health and well being benefits. Worksite interventions aimed at improving PA often yield modest effect sizes, and their theoretical ground is not profound. The Health Action Process Approach (HAPA), is a novel comprehensive theoretical model for health behavior change, that hasn't been studied as a whole in a worksite intervention study.

The objectives of the proposed study are:

  1. To develop a coaching-based group intervention that will be both grounded in theory (HAPA) as well as applicable.
  2. To evaluate the feasibility of conducting this intervention among employed hospital nurses, using a randomized controlled design, interviews and other evaluation procedures.

The proposed study will offer the most comprehensive empirical test to date of the full HAPA model.


Condition Intervention
Healthy
Behavioral: Health Coaching

Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment
Masking: Single Blind (Subject)
Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
Official Title: The Possible Influence of Health Promotion Coaching on Health Related and Organizational Outcomes Among Nurses

Resource links provided by NLM:


Further study details as provided by Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • Metabolic Syndrome Ratings [ Time Frame: Time 0 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    (Blood pressure, Sugar levels, HDL, Triglycerides, Weight)

  • Metabolic Syndrome Ratings [ Time Frame: Time 1 - 3 months Follow up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    (Blood pressure, Sugar levels, HDL, Triglycerides, Weight)

  • Metabolic Syndrome Ratings [ Time Frame: Time 2 - 6 Months Follow up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    (Blood pressure, Sugar levels, HDL, Triglycerides, Weight)

  • Metabolic Syndrome Ratings [ Time Frame: Time 3 - 9 Months Follow up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    (Blood pressure, Sugar levels, HDL, Triglycerides, Weight)


Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • Organizational Behavior Ratings [ Time Frame: Time 0 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Absenteeism,Perceived Organizational Support, Organizational Cynicism, Vigor, exhaustion, Peer Support, Social networks

  • Psychological Ratings [ Time Frame: Time 0 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Subjective Well-Being, Psychological Well-Being, Positive and Negative Affect, Self Efficacy, HAPA Stage

  • Demographic ratings [ Time Frame: Time 0 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Age, Gender, Seniority, Marital Status, Number of Kids

  • Coaching Process Ratings [ Time Frame: Time 0 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Goal Attainment

  • Organizational Behavior Ratings [ Time Frame: Time 1 - 3 months follow up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Absenteeism,Perceived Organizational Support, Organizational Cynicism, Vigor, exhaustion, Peer Support, Social networks

  • Organizational Behavior Ratings [ Time Frame: Time 2 - 6 Months Follow up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Absenteeism,Perceived Organizational Support, Organizational Cynicism, Vigor, exhaustion, Peer Support, Social networks

  • Psychological Ratings [ Time Frame: Time 1 - 3 months follow up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Subjective Well-Being, Psychological Well-Being, Positive and Negative Affect, Self Efficacy, HAPA Stage

  • Psychological Ratings [ Time Frame: Time 2 - 6 Months Follow up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Subjective Well-Being, Psychological Well-Being, Positive and Negative Affect, Self Efficacy, HAPA Stage

  • Coaching Process Ratings [ Time Frame: Time 1 - 3 months follow up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Goal Attainment

  • Coaching Process Ratings [ Time Frame: Time 2 - 6 Months Follow up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Goal Attainment

  • Organizational Behavior Ratings [ Time Frame: Time 3 - 9 Months Follow up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Absenteeism,Perceived Organizational Support, Organizational Cynicism, Vigor, exhaustion, Peer Support, Social networks

  • Psychological Ratings [ Time Frame: Time 3 - 9 Months Follow up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Subjective Well-Being, Psychological Well-Being, Positive and Negative Affect, Self Efficacy, HAPA Stage

  • Coaching Process Ratings [ Time Frame: Time 3 - 9 Months Follow up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Goal Attainment


Estimated Enrollment: 120
Study Start Date: January 2011
Estimated Study Completion Date: December 2011
Estimated Primary Completion Date: August 2011 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Arms Assigned Interventions
Experimental: Lifestyle counseling Behavioral: Health Coaching
A manual-driven group Health Coaching intervention. Once a week for 3 months.

  Eligibility

Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years to 80 Years
Genders Eligible for Study:   Both
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   Yes
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Nurses working in a full time capacity at Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None nurses or nurses working part-time at Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center.
  • Nurses not working at Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center.
  Contacts and Locations
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the Contacts provided below. For general information, see Learn About Clinical Studies.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01172834

Contacts
Contact: Izthak Shapira, MD 972-52-4262626 shapiraiz@tasmc.health.gov.il
Contact: Sharon Toker, PhD 972-52-3884789 tokersha@post.tau.ac.il

Locations
Israel
Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
Tel-Aviv, Israel
Sponsors and Collaborators
Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
Tel Aviv University
Investigators
Principal Investigator: Izthak Shapira, MD Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
  More Information

No publications provided

Responsible Party: Izthak Shapira MD, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01172834     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: TASMC-09-IS-0258-09-TLV-CTIL
Study First Received: July 18, 2010
Last Updated: July 29, 2010
Health Authority: Israel: Ethics Commission

Keywords provided by Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center:
Nurses

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on August 20, 2014