Manual Therapy Effectiveness in Comparison With Electric Nerve Stimulation (TENS) in Patients With Neck Pain
This study investigated effectiveness of manual therapy (MT) with Electric Nerve Stimulation (TENS) to reduce pain intensity in patients with mechanical neck disorder (MND). A randomized multi-centered controlled clinical trial was performed in 12 Primary Care Physiotherapy Units in Madrid Region.
|Study Design:||Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Treatment
|Official Title:||Primary Care Randomized Clinical Trial: Manual Therapy Effectiveness in Comparison With TENS in Patients With Neck Pain|
- Pain intensity measured in millimeters (Visual Visual Analogue Scale, VAS) [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
|Study Start Date:||May 2005|
|Study Completion Date:||May 2007|
|Primary Completion Date:||May 2007 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)|
|Experimental: manual therapy||
Other: Manual therapy (MT)
Ten treatment sessions of 30 minutes of MT or TENS on alternate days were provided by primary care physical therapists. MT techniques: neuromuscular technique, postisometric stretching, spray and stretching and Jones technique.
Active Comparator: TENS
Electric Nerve Stimulation (TENS)
Ten treatment sessions of 30 minutes of MT or TENS on alternate days were provided by primary care physical therapists. TENS electrode placement were: in the painful area, in the metamere or in the nerve´s pathway. It was applied at a frequency of 80 Hz, with ≤150 µs pulse duration and adjusted amplitude.
The purpose of tis study is to evaluate the effectiveness of manual therapy (MT) with Electric Nerve Stimulation (TENS) to reduce pain intensity in patients with mechanical neck disorder (MND). Design: randomized multi-centered controlled clinical trial. Location: 12 Primary Care Physiotherapy Units in Madrid Region. Ninety patients were included with diagnoses of subacute or chronic MND without neurological damage, 47 patients received MT and 43 TENS. The primary outcome was pain intensity measured in millimeters using the Visual Analogue Scale. Also disability, quality of life, adverse effects and sociodemographic and prognosis variables were measured. Three evaluations were performed (before, when the procedure finished and six months after). Seventy one patients (79%) completed the follow-up measurement at six months. In more than half of the treated patients the procedure had a clinically relevant "short term" result after having ended the intervention, when either MT or TENS was used. The success rate decreased to one third of the patients 6 months after the intervention. No differences can be found in the reduction of pain, in the decrease of disability nor in the quality of life between both therapies. Both analyzed physiotherapy techniques produce a short term pain reduction that is clinically relevant.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01153737
|Servicio Madrileño de Salud|
|Madrid, Spain, 28803|
|Principal Investigator:||Esperazna Escortell, MD||Servicio Madrileño de Salud|