PII of SBRT & Chemo for Unresectable Cholangiocarcinoma Followed by Liver Transplantation
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to determine progression-free survival at 12 months for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and chemotherapy for unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma (CCA).
Investigators hope to learn more about neoadjuvant SBRT and chemotherapy for unresectable CCA, and if SBRT followed by chemotherapy can lead to successful liver transplantation. This knowledge is important for this patient group as this disease is a highly lethal malignancy that often presents as unresectable, however surgery or transplantation are the only curative options.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Cholangiocarcinoma Hepatobiliary Neoplasm Liver Cancer Bile Duct Cancer Cancer of Gallbladder |
Procedure: Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Drug: Gemcitabine100 mg/m2 Drug: Cisplatin Drug: Carboplatin Drug: Capecitabine Drug: 5FU |
Phase 2 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Non-Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Phase II Study of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) and Chemotherapy for Unresectable Cholangiocarcinoma Followed by Liver Transplantation |
- Progression-free survival at 12 months defined in Section 9.4 [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Pathologic complete response rate as defined in Section 9.1.6 [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Serum CA 19-9 levels defined in Section 9.1.7 [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Adverse event rate as defined in Section 6.2.1 [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Overall survival at 12 months defined in Section 9.1.2 [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Liver transplant rate as defined in Section 9.1.4 [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Freedom from local progression at 12 months as defined in Section 9.1.3 [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Liver transplant conversion rate as defined in Section 9.1.5 [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Enrollment: | 2 |
| Study Start Date: | January 2011 |
| Study Completion Date: | July 2012 |
| Primary Completion Date: | April 2012 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
| Experimental: SBRT, Chemotherapy and Liver Transplantation |
Procedure: Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
Standard of care
Other Name: External photon radiation
Drug: Gemcitabine100 mg/m2
100 mg/m2, IV
Other Name: Gemzar
Drug: Cisplatin
25 mg/m2, IV
Other Names:
Drug: Carboplatin
AUC 2, based on Calvert formula, IV
Other Names:
Drug: Capecitabine
1000 mg/m2, PO
Other Name: Xeloda
Drug: 5FU
200 mg/m2
Other Names:
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
Diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma by any of the below:
- Positive transcatheter biopsy or brush cytology
- CA 19-9 ≥ 100mg/mL with a malignant-appearing stricture on cholangiography
- Biliary ploidy by fluorescent in situ hybridization with a malignant stricture on cholangiography
- Liver tumors not to exceed 8 cm in greatest axial dimension (800 cc of uninvolved liver)
- Unresectable tumor above cystic duct
Hepatic lesion in patients for whom surgical resection is not possible or would not result in an opportunity for cure by any of the below:
- Bilateral segmental ductal extension
- Encasement of the main portal vein
- Unilateral segmental ductal extension with contralateral vascular encasement
- Unilateral atrophy with either contralateral segmental ductal or vascular (hepatic artery, portal vein) involvement
- Ascites is allowed if the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score is <15[1]
- Age > 18 years old
- Eastern Clinical Oncology Group performance status 0, 1 or 2 (Appendix 1)
Lab values within 2 wks prior to randomization:
- See STUDY SCHEMA for specific blood count inclusion criteria: ANC ≥ 500 x 109/L (≥ 1500/mm3), Platelets ≥ 5 x 109/L (≥ 50,000/mm3), Hgb ≥ 9g/dL
- Adequate liver function: Total bilirubin ≤1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN); ALT and/or AST & alkaline phosphatase ≤ 5 x ULN.
- Adequate biliary drainage, with no evidence of active uncontrolled infection (patients on antibiotics are eligible).
- See STUDY SCHEMA for specific renal function inclusion criteria: Adequate renal function with a calculated GFR ≥ 40 ml/min. If the calculated GFR is below 40 ml/min a 24 hour urine creatinine clearance can be used.
- Albumin > 2.5 mg/dL
- INR ≤ 1.5
- Life expectancy > 6 months
- Capable of giving written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Prior radiotherapy to the upper abdomen
- Contraindication to receiving radiotherapy
- Prior chemotherapy
- Prior biliary resection or attempted resection
- Prior transperitoneal biopsy
- Large esophageal varices without band ligation
- Active GI bleed or within 2 weeks of study enrollment
- Ascites refractory to medical therapy or shunting
- Active/unresolved biliary tract obstruction
- Presence of multifocal, lymphatic, or extrahepatic metastases
- Participation in another concurrent treatment protocol
If history of other primary cancer, subject eligible only if she or he has:
- Curatively resected non-melanomatous skin cancer
- Curatively treated cervical carcinoma in situ
- Other primary solid tumor curatively treated with no known active disease present and no treatment administered for the last 3 years
- Any evidence of severe or uncontrolled systemic diseases or laboratory finding that in the view of the investigator makes it undesirable for the patient to participate in the trial
- Any psychiatric or other disorder (eg brain metastases) likely to impact on informed consent
- Pregnancy or breast-feeding
- While not excluded, patients with significant impaired hearing must be made aware of potential ototoxicity and may choose not to be included. If included, baseline audiograms are recommended and, in those given cisplatin, should be followed by repeat audiograms prior to cycle 2.
Contacts and Locations| United States, California | |
| Stanford University School of Medicine | |
| Stanford, California, United States, 94305 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Daniel T Chang | Stanford University |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Daniel T. Chang, Assistant Professor, Stanford University |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01151761 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | HEP0032, HEP0032 |
| Study First Received: | June 15, 2010 |
| Last Updated: | December 12, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Neoplasms Liver Neoplasms Gallbladder Neoplasms Cholangiocarcinoma Bile Duct Neoplasms Digestive System Neoplasms Neoplasms by Site Digestive System Diseases Liver Diseases Biliary Tract Neoplasms Biliary Tract Diseases Gallbladder Diseases Adenocarcinoma Carcinoma Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial |
Neoplasms by Histologic Type Bile Duct Diseases Gemcitabine Capecitabine Cisplatin Fluorouracil Carboplatin Antineoplastic Agents Therapeutic Uses Pharmacologic Actions Radiation-Sensitizing Agents Physiological Effects of Drugs Antimetabolites Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 21, 2013