Goal Directed Haemodynamic Treatment for Patients With Proximal Femoral Fracture (GDHT)
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The investigators aimed to compare the costs and consequences of 'routine perioperative fluid therapy' and 'GDHT in terms of morbidity, mortality, length of hospital stay, activity of daily living, health related quality of life, cognitive functions and need of social services and up till 12 months following operations of proximal femoral fracture at elderly. The primary hypothesis is that 'GDHT is a better strategy than 'routine fluid therapy' in terms of reduced frequency of postoperative complications.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Femoral Fracture |
Other: Goal directed haemodynamic treatment Other: Routine fluid treatment |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Evaluation of Costs and Consequences of Alternative Strategies of Intraoperative Fluid and Pharmacological Optimization. A Randomized Clinical Trial |
- number of patients with postoperative complications [ Time Frame: up to 2 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Health Related Quality of Life [ Time Frame: 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]European Quality of Life questionaire using five dimensions (EQ-5D)shall be registered preoperatively, at 4 and 12 months postoperatively
- number of complications [ Time Frame: 4 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- number of complications [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- health related quality of life [ Time Frame: 4 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- health related quality of life [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- haemodynamic parameters [ Time Frame: baseline ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Enrollment: | 150 |
| Study Start Date: | March 2010 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | June 2014 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | March 2014 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Routine fluid treatment
Buffered Glucose 25 mg/ml 1ml/kg/h Ringer`s Acetate 2 ml/kg/h and additionally as needed Voluven at the attending anaesthetist's discretion Phenylephrine 50 μg for correction of hypotension
|
Other: Routine fluid treatment
Protocol guided fluid treatment used in the clinical routine
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Goal directed haemodynamic treatment
Goal directed haemodynamic treatment Dobutamine 0.2-10 μg/kg/min Buffered Glucose 25 mg/ml 1ml/kg/h Ringer`s Acetate 2 ml/kg/h Voluven 3 ml/kg as fluid challenge at the attending anaesthetist's discretion Phenylephrine 50 μg for correction of hypotension
|
Other: Goal directed haemodynamic treatment
Treatment by fluids and Dobutamine to attain fixed haemodynamic goal
Other Names:
|
Detailed Description:
The investigation is an open, randomized clinical study of individuals suffering from a proximal femoral fracture. The total study duration for each subject is approximately 12 months (+- 1 month); each patient will have 4'visits' (i.e. when PI extracts data to database) including regular praxis total: at registration; at discharge; 4 months and finally at 12 months after the surgery. For practical and logistic reasons, an interim-analysis will be conducted after approximately 100 patients whose data are completed.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 70 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients (men and women) age ≥ 70 years
- Patients´ scheduled for operation of proximal femoral fracture during office hours
- Patient who have a witnessed or written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
Any of the following is regarded as a criterion for exclusion from the study:
- Concomitant medication with Lithium
- Known allergy (or hypersensitivity) to Lithium, or components of the medical device
- Weight ≤ 40 kg
- Other conditions or symptoms preventing the subject from entering the study, according to investigators judgment
- Life expectancy less than 6 months and/or pathological fractures
- Not possible to insert arterial line.
Contacts and Locations| Sweden | |
| Karolinska University Hospital | |
| Huddinge, Sweden, 14186 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Erzsebet Bartha, M.D | Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Dept. of Anestesiology and Intensive Care |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Erzsebet Bartha, Medical Doctor, Karolinska Institutet |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01141894 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 2009-018087-10, ID: 2008-1240-31 |
| Study First Received: | April 20, 2010 |
| Last Updated: | April 29, 2013 |
| Health Authority: | Sweden: Regional Ethical Review Board |
Keywords provided by Karolinska Institutet:
|
Proximal Femoral Fracture |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Femoral Fractures Fractures, Bone Wounds and Injuries Leg Injuries Dobutamine Phenylephrine Oxymetazoline Cardiotonic Agents Cardiovascular Agents Therapeutic Uses Pharmacologic Actions Sympathomimetics Autonomic Agents Peripheral Nervous System Agents |
Physiological Effects of Drugs Adrenergic beta-1 Receptor Agonists Adrenergic beta-Agonists Adrenergic Agonists Adrenergic Agents Neurotransmitter Agents Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Protective Agents Adrenergic alpha-1 Receptor Agonists Adrenergic alpha-Agonists Mydriatics Vasoconstrictor Agents Nasal Decongestants Respiratory System Agents |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 21, 2013