Internal Hernia After Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
To see if closing the mesenteric defects created at a Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass is better than leaving them open.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
The Prevalence of Surgery for Gastrointestinal Obstruction After a LGBP Procedure. |
Procedure: Suturing of mesenteric defects |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Internal Hernia After Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass |
- Surgery for small bowel obstruction after a LGBP procedure. [ Time Frame: 2 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Serious Complications [ Time Frame: within 2 years after surgery ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Defined as Clavien grade 3b or more
| Enrollment: | 2508 |
| Study Start Date: | May 2010 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | June 2014 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | March 2014 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Mesenteric defects sutured
Closure of the mesenteric defects using running, non-absorbable suture
|
Procedure: Suturing of mesenteric defects |
|
Mesenteric defects not sutured
Non-closure of the mesenteric defects
|
Procedure: Suturing of mesenteric defects |
Detailed Description:
When the patients who has undergone a Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass lose weight, the mesenteric defects that are inevitable to cause, gets bigger and can cause an internal hernia (IH). This study will observe whether it is better to close the defects or leave them open. The patients will be randomized into two groups. One, where the defects are closed with sutures and one where the defects are left alone. The primary endpoint of the study is the prevalence of surgery for obstruction. Information about this will be gathered through the national register for obesity surgery in Sweden, SOReg. Each arm in the study will include 1200 patients and the follow up period will be three years. Since the register mentioned above is an ongoing register, the results can be studied over a longer period if wanted. The national hospital registry will further improve the follow-up.
Eligibility| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Any patient accepted for a Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass that has given a written consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Conversion to open surgery prior to the randomization
- Patients not giving a written consent
Contacts and Locations| Sweden | |
| Department of Surgery, Örebro University Hospital | |
| Örebro, Sweden, 701 85 | |
| Study Director: | Ingmar Näslund, MD, PhD | Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Erik Stenberg, MD, MD, University Hospital Orebro |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01137201 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | EPN 2009/415 |
| Study First Received: | June 2, 2010 |
| Last Updated: | January 17, 2013 |
| Health Authority: | Sweden: The National Board of Health and Welfare Sweden: Regional Ethical Review Board |
Keywords provided by University Hospital Orebro:
|
Gastrointestinal obstruction Laparoscopic gastric bypass Internal Hernia Mesenteric defect Morbid obesity |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Hernia Hernia, Abdominal Pathological Conditions, Anatomical |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 22, 2013