Does Positive Expiratory Pressure Mask Therapy Improve Recovery From Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease?
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
This study aims to identify whether the addition of positive expiratory pressure (PEP) mask therapy to standard medical care improves clinically important outcomes in individuals with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. It is hypothesized that those who receive the additional PEP mask therapy will show greater improvements than those who do not.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive Lung Diseases, Obstructive |
Device: Positive expiratory pressure (PEP) mask therapy |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Does the Addition of Positive Expiratory Pressure (PEP) Mask Therapy to Usual Medical Care Improve Patients' Symptoms, Quality or Life and Risk of Future Exacerbations in Individuals With Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)? |
- Symptom severity [ Time Frame: Within 48 hours of presenting to hospital (day 1) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Measured via the Breathlessness, Cough and Sputum Scale (BCSS).
- Symptom severity [ Time Frame: At hospital discharge (up to approx. day 10) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Measured via the BCSS
- Symptom severity [ Time Frame: 8 weeks following hospital discharge ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Measured via the BCSS
- Symptom severity [ Time Frame: 6 months following hospital discharge ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Measured via the BCSS
- Disease-specific quality of life [ Time Frame: Within 48 hours of presenting to hospital (day 1) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Measured via the 4-week English (Australian) version of the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ).
- Disease-specific quality of life [ Time Frame: 8 weeks following hospital discharge ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Measured via the SGRQ
- Disease-specific quality of life [ Time Frame: 6 months following hospital discharge ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Measured via the SGRQ
- Need for assisted (non-invasive and/or invasive) ventilation during hospitalisation (within, and after 48 hours of presentation to hospital) [ Time Frame: At hospital discharge (up to approx. day 10) ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]The number of participants needing non-invasive or invasive ventilation during their inpatient stay shall be assessed. As early non-invasive ventilation is commonly used for the management of acute exacerbations of COPD, this outcome shall be assessed both within and after 48 hours of presentation to hospital. This aims to differentiate usual care from clinical deterioration.
- Hospital length of stay [ Time Frame: At hospital discharge (up to approx. day 10) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Measured as number of days
- Time to first exacerbation [ Time Frame: 6 months following hospital discharge ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Measured as number of days
- Time to first hospitalisation (due to respiratory illness) [ Time Frame: 6 months following hospital discharge ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Measured as number of days
- Number of acute exacerbations [ Time Frame: 6 months following hospital discharge ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Measured as number of events
- Number of hospitalisations (due to respiratory illness) [ Time Frame: 6 months following hospital discharge ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Measured as number of events
- Total number of hospitalised days [ Time Frame: 6 months following hospital discharge ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Measured as number of hospitalised days
- Lung function (spirometry) [ Time Frame: At hospital discharge (up to approx. day 10) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]e.g. FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC%
- Lung function (spirometry) [ Time Frame: 6 months following hospital discharge ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]e.g. FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC%
- Mortality (actual, all cause) [ Time Frame: At hospital discharge (up to approx. day 10) ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Measured as number of events
- Mortality (actual, all cause) [ Time Frame: 6 months following hospital discharge ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Measured as number of events
- Mortality (predicted) [ Time Frame: At hospital discharge (up to approx. day 10) ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Measured via calculation of the BODE index. The BODE index is derived from: Body mass index, Obstruction severity (spirometry), Dyspnoea (MRC dyspnoea scale) and Exercise tolerance (6 minute walk test).
- Mortality (predicted) [ Time Frame: 6 months following hospital discharge ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Measured via BODE index
| Enrollment: | 92 |
| Study Start Date: | July 2010 |
| Study Completion Date: | January 2013 |
| Primary Completion Date: | January 2013 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: 'Usual care'
Participants will receive 'usual medical care' consisting of the following:
|
|
|
Experimental: 'Usual care' plus PEP mask therapy
This will comprise:
|
Device: Positive expiratory pressure (PEP) mask therapy
PEP mask therapy will be performed once/day, supervised, by an experienced physiotherapist until hospital discharge or ≥ 24 hours without sputum expectoration (whichever comes first). Written instructions shall also be provided, encouraging two more independent PEP mask sessions per day. Each session will comprise up to 5 cycles of 8-10 slightly active breaths, followed by 2 huffs (FET) and 2 coughs. A target pressure of 10-20 cms H20 during the middle of expiration shall be used (monitored via a pressure manometer).
|
Detailed Description:
This study aims to identify whether the addition of positive expiratory pressure (PEP) mask therapy to standard medical care improves symptoms, quality of life and risk of re-exacerbation in individuals with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
A PEP mask is a small hand-held device that is self-applied over the nose and mouth. It creates a resistance against exhalation (outward) breaths which helps facilitate movement of sputum from the lungs towards the mouth.
Participants will be recruited from two tertiary metropolitan hospitals in Melbourne, Australia and randomised to receive either 'usual care' (comprising medical management, non-invasive ventilation if required, rehabilitation and allied health interventions) or 'usual care' plus PEP mask therapy for the duration of their hospital admission. All participants will then complete daily diaries for six months after discharge.
The effect of PEP mask therapy will be evaluated using a range of outcomes important to both patients and health care providers.
Eligibility| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria (all of the following criteria must be met):
- The primary reason for hospital admission is an acute exacerbation of clinically diagnosed COPD
- There is evidence of sputum expectoration or they are a chronic sputum producer ('regularly expectorates sputum on most days')
- They are able and willing to provide written, informed consent
- Recent (within the last 6 months) lung function data indicates obstructive lung disease (of any severity), according to the GOLD criteria: post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 0.7 (only if available)
- They have a smoking history of ≥ 10 pack/years (only if diagnosis unclear)
Exclusion Criteria (none of the following criteria must be present):
- They are breathing via an artificial airway (e.g. endotracheal or tracheostomy tube)
- They have a more significant respiratory disease other than COPD (e.g. primary diagnosis of bronchiectasis, cystic fibrosis, interstitial lung disease, asthma, lung cancer)
- They have had recent (within the last 6 months) lung volume reduction procedure(s) (e.g. surgery, valve or stent insertion, or other), lung transplantation or pneumonectomy
- The intervention is contraindicated (including but not limited to evidence of undrained pneumothorax, significant frank haemoptysis, recent facial, oral, oesophageal or skull surgery/trauma, altered conscious state or inability to co-operate)
- They have poor oxygen saturation at rest (SpO2 < 88%) despite supplemental oxygen delivered via nasal prongs
- They intend to continue performing established ACT routines throughout the study period
- It is more than 48 hours since being admitted as an inpatient to hospital.
Contacts and Locations| Australia, Victoria | |
| The Alfred Hospital | |
| Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3181 | |
| The Austin Hospital | |
| Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3084 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Christian R Osadnik, Bachelor of Physiotherapy | La Trobe University |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Christian Osadnik, Physiotherapist, PhD candidate, La Trobe University |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01101282 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | (not yet specified) |
| Study First Received: | April 7, 2010 |
| Last Updated: | February 13, 2013 |
| Health Authority: | Australia: Human Research Ethics Committee |
Keywords provided by La Trobe University:
|
PEP exacerbation physiotherapy |
airway clearance sputum physical Therapy modalities |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Chronic Disease Lung Diseases Respiration Disorders Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive |
Lung Diseases, Obstructive Disease Attributes Pathologic Processes Respiratory Tract Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on June 13, 2013