Diamorphine or Alfentanil for Subcutaneous Use in Hospice In-patients? (DASH)
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
OBJECTIVES:
How does Alfentanil compare with the standard drug Diamorphine for subcutaneous analgesia in the palliative care setting?
STUDY DESIGN:
An open-label pilot comparison between alfentanil and diamorphine for palliative care patients who require subcutaneous opioids.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Palliative Care |
Drug: Alfentanil Drug: Diamorphine |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Supportive Care |
| Official Title: | An Open-label Pilot Comparison Between Alfentanil and Diamorphine for Palliative Care Patients Who Require Subcutaneous Opioids |
- The change in MDAS will be calculated from day 0 to day 3 and compared between the two groups using a t-test if the data are sufficiently normally distributed, or the Mann-Whitney U test otherwise. [ Time Frame: day 3 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Change in MDAS between Days 0 and 7 [ Time Frame: Day 7 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]The change in MDAS will be calculated from day 0 to day 7 and compared between the two groups using a t-test if the data are sufficiently normally distributed, or the Mann-Whitney U test otherwise.
- The change in the BPI-SF [ Time Frame: Day 3 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]The change in BPI-SF will be calculated from day 0 to day 3 and compared between the two groups using a t-test if the data are sufficiently normally distributed, or the Mann-Whitney U test otherwise.
- The change in BPI-SF [ Time Frame: Day 7 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]The change in BPI-SF will be calculated from day 0 to day 7 and compared between the two groups using a t-test if the data are sufficiently normally distributed, or the Mann-Whitney U test otherwise.
- The difference in proportion of patients taking laxatives [ Time Frame: Day 7 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The difference in proportion of patients taking laxatives will be compared between the two groups using the confidence interval on the difference of two proportions.
- The change in nausea visual analogue scale [ Time Frame: Day 3 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]The change in nausea visual analogue scale will be calculated from day 0 to day 3 and compared between the two groups using a t-test if the data are sufficiently normally distributed, or the Mann-Whitney U test otherwise.
- Change in the number of vomits [ Time Frame: Day3 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]The change in number of vomits will be calculated from day 0 to day 3 and compared between the two groups using a t-test if the data are sufficiently normally distributed, or the Mann-Whitney U test otherwise.
- Change in nausea visual analogue scale [ Time Frame: Day 7 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]The change in nausea visual analogue scale will be calculated from day 0 to day 7 and compared betwen the two groups using a t-test if the data are sufficiently normally distributed, or the Mann-WhitneyU test otherwise
- Change in the number of vomits [ Time Frame: Day 7 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]The change in number of vomits will be calculated from day 0 to day 7 and compared betwen the two groups using a t-test if the data are sufficiently normally distributed, or the Mann-Whitney U test otherwise.
- Change in the total dosage of breakthrough medication (number of doses x dosage) [ Time Frame: Day 3 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]The change in the total dosage of breakthrough medication will be calculated from day 0 to day 3 and compared betwen the two groups using a t-test if the data are sufficiently normally distributed, or the Mann-WhitneyU test otherwise
- Change in the total dosage of breakthrough medication (number of doses x dosage) [ Time Frame: Day 7 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]The change in the total dosage of breakthrough medication will be calculated from day 0 to day 7 and compared betwen the two groups using a t-test if the data are sufficiently normally distributed, or the Mann-WhitneyU test otherwise
| Estimated Enrollment: | 20 |
| Study Start Date: | September 2010 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | December 2012 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | September 2012 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Alfentanil
Hospice in-patients who require subcutaneous strong opioid administration will be given alfentanil
|
Drug: Alfentanil
Titrated to a maximum dose of 50mg in 24 hours subcutaneously
|
|
Active Comparator: Diamorphine
Hospice in-patients who require strong opioids will be given diamorphine
|
Drug: Diamorphine
Titrated to a maximum dose of 500mg in 24 hours given subcutaneously
|
Detailed Description:
STUDY DESIGN
Study 1 - Open Label Pilot Day - 1 Hospice in-patients who are thought by a clinician to need subcutaneous strong opioids will be asked if they wish to take part in the study.
They will be given a patient information leaflet and a 'cooling off period' (a minimum of 1 day) to think about it. If the clinician feels that strong parenteral opioids are needed diamorphine will be commenced immediately (as standard practice).
Day 0 If the patient agrees to take part in the trial they will be asked to complete a consent form and this will be stored with the patient's notes.
The following assessments will be performed:
- McGill Pain Questionnaire Short Form(MPQ-SF)
- Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF)These measures were recommended by an EAPC Expert Working Group for pain syndrome characterization
- Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS). This has been validated in an advanced cancer population and used recently with hospice in-patients.
- Nausea Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
- Nausea Duration over last 24 hours
- Number of vomits in previous 24 hours
Randomisation Once baseline measures are completed the participant will be randomised using the next available of a series of numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes. These will be prepared remotely. Blocking will be used to prevent an imbalance in terms of the number allocated to each group. Block size will be appropriate to the size of the study and not be divulged to the investigators responsible for consent and revealing the allocation. This will reduce the risk of investigators anticipating the allocation for particular patients. A study log will be kept on site where participant details will be completed before the envelope is opened.
Subsequent Days
On each subsequent day the following assessments will be performed:
- BPI-SF
- MDAS
- Nausea VAS
Number of vomits in previous 24 hours
In addition the following measurements will be taken:
- Stool chart for previous 24 hours
- Breakthrough medication (number of doses and dosage) used
- Laxatives taken
- Other changes to medication
Patients will cease participation after assessment on day 7.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- To be thought by a hospice doctor to require parenteral strong opioids.
- To have an estimated prognosis of less than 1 year.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Inability to read English sufficiently to be able to complete assessment questionnaires.
- Confusion sufficient so that patient is unable to complete questionnaires.
- Weakness or fatigue sufficient so that patient is unable to complete questionnaires.
- Radiotherapy to source of pain in last 4 weeks.
- Change in corticosteroid dose in last week.
Contacts and Locations| Contact: Paul Perkins, MB BCh MRCP (UK_ | +44 1242 230199 | paul.perkins@suerydercare.org |
| United Kingdom | |
| Sue Ryder Care Leckhampton Court Hospice | Recruiting |
| Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom, GL53 0QJ | |
| Contact: Paul Perkins, MB BCh MRCP (UK) +44 1242 230199 paul.perkins@suerydercare.org | |
| Principal Investigator: Paul Perkins, MB Bch MRCP (UK) | |
| Principal Investigator: | Paul Perkins, MB BCh MRCP(UK) | Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Paul Perkins, Chief Investigator, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01049672 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 07/Q0104/47 |
| Study First Received: | January 13, 2010 |
| Last Updated: | March 21, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | United Kingdom: National Health Service |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Alfentanil Heroin Narcotics Central Nervous System Depressants Physiological Effects of Drugs Pharmacologic Actions Analgesics Sensory System Agents |
Peripheral Nervous System Agents Central Nervous System Agents Therapeutic Uses Anesthetics, Intravenous Anesthetics, General Anesthetics Analgesics, Opioid |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 22, 2013