Safety Study of Keyhole Gallbladder Surgery With Removal of Gallbladder Via the Stomach Rather Than Through the Skin
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The benefits of laparoscopic ("minimally invasive" or "keyhole") surgery for gallbladder removal (cholecystectomy) over open surgical procedures in terms of significant reductions in pain, scarring and recovery time are well accepted. In a conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy however, the excised gallbladder still has to be extracted through the abdominal wall skin via a laparoscopic port site using an incision of 10mm or greater. Despite being much smaller than that required for open surgery, this incision is painful, leaves a scar and can result in a port site hernia to follow requiring further surgery to repair it. Recent attempts to further reduce the invasiveness of the surgical procedure have suggested performing the operation via an endoscope passed through the mouth and through an incision in the stomach wall - so called Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES). Unlike a skin incision, an incision in the wall of the stomach (gastrotomy) should give no pain, visible scar or herniation risk yet still allow access to the peritoneal cavity for surgical procedures such as cholecystectomy. Against this, it has the potential risks of contamination and leakage of gastric contents into the peritoneal cavity. Whilst the limitations of present technology make it very difficult to perform an entire cholecystectomy through the stomach wall in patients, endoscopic methods for closing a gastrotomy are available that are approved for use in patients (CE marked) and it is hypothesised that removing the excised gallbladder through the stomach in this way would avoid the problems of extracting it through the abdominal wall described above. Data are required to determine whether the extraction of the gallbladder via a gastrotomy rather than through the skin is safe, producing smaller scars and a better cosmetic result. A secondary endpoint would be to assess possible reductions in pain and recovery from this less invasive approach.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Cholecystectomy |
Procedure: Recovery of gallbladder via gastrotomy instead of via the skin |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Safety and Feasibility Trial of Laparoscopic Small Port Cholecystectomy With Transgastric Gallbladder Recovery |
- This is a pilot study aimed at examining the outcomes of gallbladder recovery through a gastrotomy, concentrating on safety. The main outcome is presence of surgical complications. [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Secondary outcomes include pain levels and cosmetic satisfaction [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Estimated Enrollment: | 12 |
| Study Start Date: | December 2009 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | December 2012 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | December 2012 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
-
Procedure: Recovery of gallbladder via gastrotomy instead of via the skin
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 21 Years to 65 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Fit patients, avoiding extremes of age, with uncomplicated gallstone disease requiring elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Direct healthcare team deny permission to approach patient for trial.
- Patient request / preference.
- Age (< 21 or > 65 yrs old).
- Co-morbidity (ASA level 3 or above).
- BMI > 32.
- Complicated gallstone disease (eg bile duct stones/ERCP/pancreatitis).
- Gallstones ≥ 18 mm size (too large to recover via oesophagus).
- Pregnancy.
- Previous gastric or upper abdominal surgery (alterations in gastric anatomy or adhesions preventing safe gastrotomy).
- Emergency procedure.
- Planned other operation during cholecystectomy.
- Inability to consent or psychiatric or addiction problems relevant to surgery.
Contacts and Locations| United Kingdom | |
| Colchester General Hospital | |
| Colchester, Essex, United Kingdom, CO4 5JL | |
| Principal Investigator: | Ralph Austin, MS, FRCS | Colchester General Hospital |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Mr Ralph Austin, Consultant laparoscopic surgeon, Colchester Hospital University NHS Foundation Trust |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01010685 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 09/H0302/104 |
| Study First Received: | November 7, 2009 |
| Last Updated: | September 10, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | United Kingdom: National Health Service United Kingdom: Research Ethics Committee |
Keywords provided by Colchester Hospital University NHS Foundation Trust:
|
Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) Transgastric surgery Surgical Procedures, Minimally Invasive |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on June 17, 2013