Efficacy and Tolerability of Intranasal Fentanyl Spray for the Treatment of Breakthrough Pain in Cancer Patients Older Than 18 Years (GENISIS)
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Nycomed: A Takeda Company
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Takeda Global Research & Development Center, Inc. ( Nycomed: A Takeda Company )
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00994760
First received: October 5, 2009
Last updated: August 27, 2012
Last verified: August 2012
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intranasal fentanyl spray in cancer patients over four weeks, especially during cancer-related breakthrough pain (BTP) attacks. The fentanyl spray was applied into the nose by a metered-spray device. The study was to provide further data on pharmacoeconomic efficiency of intranasal fentanyl spray.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Breakthrough Pain Cancer |
Drug: Instanyl (Intranasal Fentanyl) |
| Study Type: | Observational |
| Study Design: | Observational Model: Cohort Time Perspective: Prospective |
| Official Title: | A Prospective Non-interventional/Observational Patient Cohort Study on the Efficacy of Intranasal Fentanyl Spray for the Treatment of Breakthrough Pain in Cancer Patients. |
Resource links provided by NLM:
Further study details as provided by Takeda Global Research & Development Center, Inc.:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- Dose of Instanyl [ Time Frame: during therapy with Instanyl (planned: 28 days) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Initially prescribed dose/ most efficient single dose of Instanyl at study end
- Physician: Degree of Maximum Pain Intensity During the Last Days/ Since the Last Examination [ Time Frame: before and after therapy with Instanyl (first/last visit) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Scale: 0=no, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=strong, 4=very strong, 5=extreme
- Physician: Assessment of Breakthrough Pain Therapy (Initial Visit: Previous/Last Visit: Instanyl) [ Time Frame: before and after therapy with Instanyl (first/last visit) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Scale: 1=very good, 2=good, 3=satisfactory, 4=poor, 5=very poor, 6=insufficient
- Physician: To What Extent Did Your Expectations in Instanyl Have Met? (Last Visit) [ Time Frame: after therapy with Instanyl (planned: 4 weeks) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]5=completely, 4=for the most part, 3=partially, 2= more or less, 1=rather not, 0=not at all
- Physician: To What Extent Changes Have Occurred Induced by the Treatment of Breakthrough Pain With Instanyl With Respect to ... (at Last Visit) [ Time Frame: after therapy with Instanyl (at last visit) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Scale: -3= very much improved, -2= much improved, -1= improved, 0= comparable, 1= worsened, 2= much worsened ,3= very much worsened
- Physician: What is the Current Treatment Needs of Your Patient Regarding ... [ Time Frame: before and after therapy with Instanyl (first/last visit) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Scale: 0=no, 1=low, 2=medium, 3=high
Secondary Outcome Measures:
- Physician: Degree of Relief of Breakthrough Pain Achieved by Instanyl at Study End [ Time Frame: after therapy with Instanyl (planned: 4 weeks) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]0=no reduction, 1=slight, 2=medium, 3=strong, 4=very strong, 5=complete
- Patient: How Many Episodes of Pain You Experience on Average? [ Time Frame: initial visit (before start of therapy with Instanyl) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Patient: Description of Pain at Initial Visit [ Time Frame: initial visit (before start of therapy with Instanyl) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]0=no pain, 10= most intense pain imaginable
- Patient: How do You Feel Today? [ Time Frame: before and after therapy with Instanyl (first/last visit) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Scale: 1=very bad, 2=bad, 3=mediocre, 4=good, 5=very good
- Patient: To What Extent Your Present Condition is Affected by Your Pain Attacks? [ Time Frame: before and after therapy with Instanyl (first/last visit) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Scale: 0=not at all, 10=completely
- Patient: Modified Pain Disability Index (mPDI) - Sum - Score (Complete Questionnaires Only) [ Time Frame: before and after therapy with Instanyl (first/last visit) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Scale: 0=no impairment, 70=complete impairment
- Patient: Quality-of-Life-Impairment by Pain =QLIP - Sum - Score (Complete Questionnaires Only) [ Time Frame: before and after therapy with Instanyl (first/last visit) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Scale: 0=complete impairment, 43=no impairment
- Patient: Quality-of-Life-Impairment by Pain =QLIP - Sum - Score (Complete Questionnaires Only) Conspicuous ≤20 [ Time Frame: before and after therapy with Instanyl (first/last visit) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
0= conspicuous ≤20
1= inconspicuous >20
- Patient: Marburg Questionnaire on Habitual Health (MQHH): Sum - Score (Complete Questionnaires Only) [ Time Frame: before and after therapy with Instanyl (first/last visit) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Scale: 0=worst, 5=best
- Patient: Marburg Questionnaire on Habitual Health (MQHH): Sum - Score (Complete Questionnaires Only) Conspicuous <1.5 [ Time Frame: before and after therapy with Instanyl (first/last visit) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]conspicuous score <1.5 inconspicuous score ≥1.5
- Patient: Degree of Relief of Breakthrough Pain Achieved by Instanyl at Study End [ Time Frame: after therapy with Instanyl (planned: 4 weeks) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]0=no reduction, 1=slight, 2=medium, 3=strong, 4=very strong, 5=complete
- Patient: Assessment of Breakthrough Pain Therapy (Initial Visit: Previous/Last Visit: Instanyl) [ Time Frame: before and after therapy with Instanyl (first/last visit) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Scale: 1=very good, 2=good, 3=satisfactory, 4=poor, 5=very poor, 6=insufficient
- Patient: To What Extent Did Your Expectations in Instanyl Have Met With Respect to ... (Last Visit) [ Time Frame: after therapy with Instanyl (planned: 4 weeks) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]5=completely, 4=for the most part, 3=partially, 2=more or less, 1=rather not, 0=not at all
- Patient: To What Extent Changes Have Occurred Induced by the Treatment of Breakthrough Pain With Instanyl With Respect to ...(at Last Visit) [ Time Frame: after therapy with Instanyl (at last visit) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Scale: -3= very much improved, -2= much improved, -1= improved , 0= comparable, 1= worsened, 2= much worsened, 3= very much worsened
- Caregiver: Degree of Relief of Breakthrough Pain Achieved by Instany at Study End [ Time Frame: after therapy with Instanyl (planned: 4 weeks) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]0=no reduction, 1=slight, 2=medium, 3=strong, 4=very strong, 5=complete
- Caregiver: Assessment of Breakthrough Pain Therapy by Instanyl (Last Visit) [ Time Frame: after therapy with Instanyl (first/last visit) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Scale: 1=very good, 2=good, 3=satisfactory, 4=poor, 5=very poor, 6=insufficient
- Caregiver: To What Extent Changes Have Occurred Induced by the Treatment of Breakthrough Pain With Instanyl With Respect to ... (at Last Visit) [ Time Frame: after therapy with Instanyl (at last visit) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Scale: -3= very much improved, -2= much improved, -1= improved , 0= comparable, 1= worsened, 2= much worsened, 3= very much worsened
- Caregiver: To What Extent the Treatment Needs of Your Patient Has Changed by the Use of Instanyl Regarding ... [ Time Frame: after therapy with Instanyl (last visit) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Scale: -3= very much less, -2= much less, -1= less, 0=comparable, 1= more, 2= much more, 3= very much more
| Enrollment: | 131 |
| Study Start Date: | September 2009 |
| Study Completion Date: | November 2010 |
| Primary Completion Date: | September 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Groups/Cohorts | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
| GENISIS |
Drug: Instanyl (Intranasal Fentanyl)
This was an observational study. Therefore, the physician decided about dosage according to individual needs.
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
| Sampling Method: | Non-Probability Sample |
Study Population
Outpatients
Criteria
Inclusion criteria:
- decision to start treatment with intranasal fentanyl spray
- written informed consent
Exclusion criteria:
- criteria as defined in the Summary of Product Characteristics (Fachinformation Chapter 4.3)
Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00994760
Show 168 Study Locations
Show 168 Study LocationsSponsors and Collaborators
Nycomed: A Takeda Company
Investigators
| Study Director: | Dr. Thomas D. Bethke, PhD; MD | Nycomed Deutschland GmbH, 78467 Konstanz, Germany |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Takeda Global Research & Development Center, Inc. ( Nycomed: A Takeda Company ) |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00994760 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | FT-1301-401-DE |
| Study First Received: | October 5, 2009 |
| Results First Received: | March 13, 2012 |
| Last Updated: | August 27, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | Germany: Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices |
Keywords provided by Takeda Global Research & Development Center, Inc.:
|
intranasal fentanyl spray |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Fentanyl Adjuvants, Anesthesia Central Nervous System Agents Therapeutic Uses Pharmacologic Actions Narcotics Central Nervous System Depressants Physiological Effects of Drugs |
Analgesics Sensory System Agents Peripheral Nervous System Agents Anesthetics, Intravenous Anesthetics, General Anesthetics Analgesics, Opioid |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 21, 2013