Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Effectiveness Study of Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) Versus Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
This study is currently recruiting participants.
Verified by Aspire Foundation, September 2009
First Received: September 11, 2009   No Changes Posted
Sponsor: Aspire Foundation
Collaborators: BlueCross BlueShield of Kansas City
Cardiovascular Imaging Technologies
Cardiovascular Consultants PA
Mid America Heart Institute
Information provided by: Aspire Foundation
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00976053
  Purpose

The purpose of this study is to compare pharmacologic stress myocardial perfusion PET with pharmacologic stress myocardial perfusion SPECT in a near-simultaneous, head-to-head comparison in the same patient. The investigators hypothesize that pharmacologic stress myocardial perfusion PET will prove superior to pharmacologic stress myocardial perfusion SPECT as a first-line diagnostic test for higher-risk patients with known coronary artery disease (CAD) who present with symptoms consistent with possible worsening of their CAD.


Condition Intervention Phase
Symptomatic Coronary Artery Disease
Procedure: Myocardial perfusion imaging
Phase IV

Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Diagnostic, Randomized, Open Label, Parallel Assignment, Efficacy Study
Official Title: Clinical Effectiveness of Pharmacologic Stress Radionuclide Myocardial Perfusion Imaging as a Guide to Management of Patients With Known CAD: Comparison of Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) and Positron Emission Tomography (PET)

Resource links provided by NLM:


Further study details as provided by Aspire Foundation:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • Diagnostic failure of SPECT vs PET [ Time Frame: 60 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • Composite of diagnostic or clinical failure [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Each of individual components of clinical failure [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Relative effect on quality of life [ Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Relative direct and downstream costs [ Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months, 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

Estimated Enrollment: 330
Study Start Date: June 2009
Estimated Study Completion Date: June 2012
Estimated Primary Completion Date: June 2011 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Arms Assigned Interventions
SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging: Active Comparator Procedure: Myocardial perfusion imaging
Randomization assignment to one of SPECT or PET myocardial perfusion imaging
PET myocardial perfusion imaging: Active Comparator Procedure: Myocardial perfusion imaging
Randomization assignment to one of SPECT or PET myocardial perfusion imaging

  Eligibility

Ages Eligible for Study:   30 Years to 80 Years
Genders Eligible for Study:   Both
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • History of coronary artery disease
  • New or worsening symptoms
  • Out-patients and in-hospital patients

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior Q-wave myocardial infarction
  • Creatinine above 2.5 mg%
  • Prior coronary artery bypass surgery
  • PCI within prior 6 months
  • Pregnant females
  • Cardiomyopathy (LVEF below 40%)
  • Significant valvular heart disease
  • Body mass index greater than 36
  Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00976053

Contacts
Contact: Timothy M Bateman, M.D. 816-751-8542 tbateman@cc-pc.com
Contact: Staci A Courter, M.A. 816-531-2842 ext 107 scourter@cvit.com

Locations
United States, Missouri
Cardiovascular Consultants, P.A. Recruiting
Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64111
Contact: Timothy M Bateman, M.D.     816-751-8542     tbateman@cc-pc.com    
Contact: Staci A Courter, M.A.     816-531-2842 ext 107     scourter@cvit.com    
Principal Investigator: Timothy M Bateman, M.D.            
Sub-Investigator: Iain A McGhie, M.D.            
Sponsors and Collaborators
Aspire Foundation
BlueCross BlueShield of Kansas City
Cardiovascular Imaging Technologies
Cardiovascular Consultants PA
Mid America Heart Institute
Investigators
Principal Investigator: Timothy M Bateman, M.D. Aspire Foundation
  More Information

No publications provided

Responsible Party: ASPIRE Foundation ( Timothy M. Bateman, MD )
Study ID Numbers: 09-307
Study First Received: September 11, 2009
Last Updated: September 11, 2009
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00976053     History of Changes
Health Authority: United States: Institutional Review Board

Keywords provided by Aspire Foundation:
Coronary artery disease
Myocardial perfusion imaging
Single photon emission computed tomography
Positron emission tomography

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Arterial Occlusive Diseases
Coronary Disease
Heart Diseases
Myocardial Ischemia
Vascular Diseases
Cardiovascular Diseases
Arteriosclerosis
Coronary Artery Disease

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on February 08, 2010