Double-Lumen Tube With or Without a Carinal Hook
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Hopital Foch
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Hopital Foch
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00969683
First received: August 28, 2009
Last updated: May 9, 2013
Last verified: May 2013
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Most teams use a left double-lumen tube. The double-lumen tube is available with or without a carinal hook. The hook is supposed to facilitate the positioning of the tube and avoid the mobilization of the tube during surgery. The use of double-lumen tubes with a hook is large in Europe and quite unknown in US. The literature is poor, containing only few case reports.
The purpose of this research is to compare the two types of left double-lumen tube.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Anesthesia |
Device: Tracheal intubation |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Subject) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Comparison Between Left Double-lumen Tube With or Without a Carinal Hook During Lung Surgery |
Further study details as provided by Hopital Foch:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- time required to initially position the assigned tube [ Time Frame: end of anesthesia ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Secondary Outcome Measures:
- degree of lung collapse [ Time Frame: end of anesthesia ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- number of intraoperatively FOB examinations [ Time Frame: end of anesthesia ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Glottic or tracheo-bronchial lesion [ Time Frame: end of hospitalisation ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Sore throat or hoarse voice [ Time Frame: end of hospitalisation ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Enrollment: | 184 |
| Study Start Date: | August 2009 |
| Study Completion Date: | May 2013 |
| Primary Completion Date: | December 2012 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Double lumen tube without a hook
Broncho-Cath™, Mallinckrodt France, Parc d'Affaires Technopolis, 3 avenue du Canada, Bât Sigma, Les Ulis, 91975 Courtaboeuf Cedex
|
Device: Tracheal intubation
Tracheal intubation using a Double lumen tube without a hook
|
|
Experimental: Double lumen tube with a hook
Broncho-Cath™, Mallinckrodt France, Parc d'Affaires Technopolis, 3 avenue du Canada, Bât Sigma, Les Ulis, 91975 Courtaboeuf Cedex
|
Device: Tracheal intubation
Tracheal intubation with a Double lumen tube with a hook
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients scheduled for lung surgery requiring one-lung ventilation
Exclusion Criteria:
- pregnancy
- ASA class 4
- prevision of difficult intubation or of pulmonary aspiration
Contacts and Locations
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Hopital Foch |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00969683 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 2009/21 |
| Study First Received: | August 28, 2009 |
| Last Updated: | May 9, 2013 |
| Health Authority: | France: Afssaps - Agence française de sécurité sanitaire des produits de santé (Saint-Denis) |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 16, 2013