Variations of Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Social Anxiety Disorder
Recruitment status was Not yet recruiting
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of two variants of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) (cognitive therapy (CT) and acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT)), for the treatment of generalized social anxiety disorder.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Social Anxiety |
Behavioral: Cognitive Therapy Behavioral: Acceptance and Commitment Therapy |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Variations of Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Social Anxiety Disorder |
- Social Phobia and Anxiety Scale [ Time Frame: pre-treatment, mid-treatment, post-treatment, 3 month followup, 12 month followup ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Social Anxiety Scale [ Time Frame: pre-treatment, mid-treatment, post-treatment, 3 month followup, 12 month followup ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Beck Depression Inventory [ Time Frame: pre-treatment, mid-treatment, post-treatment, 3 month followup, 12 month followup ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Beck Anxiety Inventory [ Time Frame: pre-treatment, mid-treatment, post-treatment, 3 month followup, 12 month followup ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Quality of Life Inventory [ Time Frame: pre-treatment, mid-treatment, post-treatment, 3 month followup, 12 month followup ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Outcomes Questionnaire [ Time Frame: pre-treatment, mid-treatment, post-treatment, 3 month followup, 12 month followup ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale [ Time Frame: pre-treatment, mid-treatment, post-treatment, 3 month followup, 12 month followup ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Sheehan Disability Scale [ Time Frame: pre-treatment, mid-treatment, post-treatment, 3 month followup, 12 month followup ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Clinical Global Impression Scale [ Time Frame: pre-treatment, mid-treatment, post-treatment, 3 month followup, 12 month followup ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Client Satisfaction Survey [ Time Frame: Post-Treatment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Behavioral Assessment Test [ Time Frame: Pre-treatment, Post-treatment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Five Factor Mindfulness Questionnaire [ Time Frame: pre-treatment, mid-treatment, post-treatment, 3 month followup, 12 month followup ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Drexel Defusion Scale (DDS) [ Time Frame: pre-treatment, mid-treatment, post-treatment, 3 month followup, 12 month followup ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Philadelphia Mindfulness Scale (PHLMS) [ Time Frame: pre-treatment, mid-treatment, post-treatment, 3 month followup, 12 month followup ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire (ATQ) [ Time Frame: pre-treatment, mid-treatment, post-treatment, 3 month followup, 12 month followup ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Before-Session Questionnaire (BSQ) [ Time Frame: weekly ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Reaction to Treatment Questionnaire (RTQ) [ Time Frame: After 2nd session ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Experiences Questionnaire [ Time Frame: pre-treatment, mid-treatment, post-treatment, 3 month followup, 12 month followup ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Social Anxiety Session Change Index [ Time Frame: weekly ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Estimated Enrollment: | 80 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | May 2012 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | May 2012 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: cognitive therapy
cognitive therapy and exposure
|
Behavioral: Cognitive Therapy
Cognitive therapy (CT) highlights the identification and reappraisal of distorted or dysfunctional cognitions in the treatment of psychopathology. For example, socially anxious patients are taught to identify the thoughts and underlying beliefs that trigger strong emotional reactions (e.g., "if I attempt to initiate a conversation I'll humiliate myself"), and then replace these with more accurate, functional thoughts. There is a large body of research supporting the efficacy of CT for mood and anxiety disorders, and for social anxiety disorder in particular (Beck, 2005).
Other Name: CT
|
|
Active Comparator: acceptance and committment therapy
acceptance and commitment therapy and exposure
|
Behavioral: Acceptance and Commitment Therapy
ACT does not attempt to modify cognitions directly, but rather seeks to foster a mindful acceptance of whatever thoughts or feelings arise, while still pursuing specific behavioral goals. For example, the individual would be taught simply to notice the thoughts as if from a distance without attempting to modify them, and to go ahead and initiate a conversation. Like other newer mindfulness and acceptance-based models of CBT, ACT also expands the traditional focus on symptom reduction to include an emphasis on broader life goals. The scientific literature on ACT has expanded rapidly over the past ten years. Recent reviews conclude that it appears to be at least as effective as CT, and may work at least in part via distinct treatment mechanisms (Powers, Zum Vörde Sive Vörding, & Emmelkamp, 2009).
Other Name: ACT
|
Detailed Description:
We will recruit a clinical sample of patients who meet diagnostic criteria (per the DSM-IV) for the generalized subtype of social anxiety disorder. Participants will be randomly assigned to the two active intervention conditions; no placebo or sham treatments will be employed. Assessments will take place at baseline, pre-treatment, mid-treatment, post-treatment, and at 3- and 12-months follow-up; participants will also complete a brief weekly assessment of functioning. Treatment will be administered individually by trained graduate students in clinical psychology, directly trained and supervised by the PI and Co-PI. Participants will receive 12 weekly 1-hour long sessions. The study design is a 2 (treatment condition) by 5 (assessment occasion) mixed factorial design.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 65 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Clinically diagnosable social anxiety disorder (generalized subtype per DSM-IV-TR criteria)
- aged 18-65
- working fluency in English
- residence in the greater Philadelphia area.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pervasive developmental disability
- acute suicide potential
- inability to travel to the treatment site
- schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder
- current substance dependence
- Comorbid diagnoses of Major Depressive or other mood or anxiety disorders are acceptable ONLY if clearly secondary to the diagnosis of social anxiety disorder.
Contacts and Locations| Contact: James Herbert, Ph.D. | 215.762.1692 | james.herbert@drexel.edu |
| Contact: Evan Forman, Ph.D. | 215.762.4021 | evan.forman@drexel.edu |
| United States, Pennsylvania | |
| Drexel University | Not yet recruiting |
| Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19102 | |
| Contact: James Herbert, Ph.D. 215-762-1692 james.herbert@drexel.edu | |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | James Herbert, Ph.D., Drexel University |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00948974 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 18345 |
| Study First Received: | July 29, 2009 |
| Last Updated: | May 24, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |
Keywords provided by Drexel University:
|
social anxiety treatment |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Anxiety Disorders Phobic Disorders Mental Disorders |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 21, 2013